In general I find that I want to support the left's idea that we should try and help people who are disadvantaged improve their lives but the problem is that to many of their ideas actually make things worse and to often we see things like this where they are picking winners and losers based on who the like. When you look at our countries history it makes sense to want to help a black kid get into college but if you base things on race you ignore the fact that most of the poor in this country are white and can even end up helping rich black kid over a poor white one. Here we have a university wanting to increase diversity by offering scholarships to LGBT students. Is it because there are not enough LGBT students in in liberal arts schools or because this is a group they like and they really don't care about need or diversity and they just use those ideas to sugar coat their bias? If they wanted to actually increase the diversity in their school they would encourage conservatives to go there but I would bet they would shutter at the idea of real diversity of thought being brought into their campus. With this kind of flawed logic from out university it isn't hard to see why we have a growing disregard for the intellectual class in this country. Maybe if they had more intelligence and less ideology they would be held in higher regard.
From what I see, you are saying that this University is doing a bad thing by offering scholarships to LGBT students, in order to increase the diversity of the student body, when instead they should only be offering scholarships to the people that are intellectually above everyone else, regardless of their sexual orientation.
BUT.
The article clearly states that while it seeks to attract diversity through offering the scholarship,
Prospective freshmen and transfer students applying for the 2012 fall semester will become the first group of applicants to check “yes,” “no” or “prefer not to answer.” Their answers will not play a role in the admissions process.
It seems like that the scholarship will only be given to people that are intellectually be capable of doing the work in any case. They are merely offering the scholarship to attract more LGBT applicants.
You should read further:
A “yes” answer could put students in line to qualify for a scholarship worth one-third of tuition at the private, liberal arts school affiliated with the United Church of Christ, said Rold.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left
- 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM
1143 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy.
- 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM
737 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article
- 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM
653 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter.
- 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
725 Views
Ummm, did you read the article?
- 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM
801 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either
- 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM
781 Views
But that's just a scholarship.
- 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM
762 Views
so you would OK if the only offered it to straight students? *NM*
- 25/08/2011 09:50:44 PM
286 Views
You do realize that there are indeed universities refusing admission to gay students?
- 25/08/2011 10:02:41 PM
624 Views
I would have no problem with a LGBT only school as long as it didn't take state money
- 25/08/2011 10:27:48 PM
706 Views
This is a private university, not a state university *NM*
- 25/08/2011 10:29:15 PM
317 Views
sorry that ended with NM. Were you trying to make a point if so I missed it *NM*
- 25/08/2011 10:40:48 PM
334 Views
I expect some donor created a scholarship with that stipulation.
- 25/08/2011 10:40:09 PM
730 Views
I know my reply to his message may have made in seem that I was objecting to the scholarship
- 25/08/2011 11:10:33 PM
748 Views
If you're talking about "affirmative action", then yes, I oppose that.
- 26/08/2011 09:19:33 AM
681 Views
I don't really have a problem with this
- 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM
798 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it
- 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM
656 Views
Fair Enough
- 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM
700 Views
The United Church of Christ is a rather liberal denomination - celebrating gay marriages, notably.
- 25/08/2011 10:06:26 PM
660 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity
- 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM
814 Views
well. It could be they just needed a reason, but for some reason couldn't be forthright?
- 26/08/2011 03:28:52 AM
653 Views
One of your lines struck me.
- 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM
803 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result
- 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
626 Views
That's an interesting point...
- 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM
725 Views
yes but but despite how much he was hated by the left the right saw him different
- 25/08/2011 11:32:19 PM
838 Views
Re: yes but but despite how much he was hated by the left the right saw him different
- 26/08/2011 09:57:13 PM
726 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result
- 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM
755 Views
I don't think most people believed Obama was a centrist so much as the anti-Bush
- 26/08/2011 12:40:43 AM
669 Views
I think you'll find very few Europeans agreeing with that assessment.
- 26/08/2011 10:18:19 PM
650 Views
Wow what a strawman
- 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM
814 Views
- 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM
814 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman
- 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM
608 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired
- 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM
785 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity.
- 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM
620 Views
- 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM
620 Views
I would definetly check "yes"
- 26/08/2011 12:11:29 AM
800 Views
but if they wanted to increase diversity they would offer yo a scholarship for being Muslim
- 26/08/2011 12:46:46 AM
656 Views
- 26/08/2011 12:46:46 AM
656 Views
id be a gay muslim, so Id be 3 minorities, a woman, a muslim and a lesbian, now if only I was black!
- 26/08/2011 02:16:50 AM
724 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"...
- 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM
743 Views
a question for you...
- 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM
889 Views
I guess my question for you is how I made it sound like LGBT=liberal
- 26/08/2011 09:47:16 PM
647 Views
My guess is because you referenced "the lefts" fuzzy logic in a thread about a LGBT scholarship.
- 26/08/2011 11:07:32 PM
813 Views
