Active Users:633 Time:27/08/2025 10:13:33 AM
so you don't disagree with me or you do? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM
Students are offered scholarships for all sorts of reasons like being tall but typically schools use them to attract certain types of students or for social reasons. From what I am getting from your reply you think they are doing it finical reasons so in affect you believe they are practicing false diversity to increase profit? Now that sounds more like something a conservative would do I personally doubt it will increase their profits but hey I am getting old an really don't understand what motivates the average 20 year old anymore. When I was twenty easy coeds was a bigger draw but today if you can be known as a gay friendly college I doubt it would hurt you so you may be right.
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1114 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 709 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 717 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 757 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 623 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 594 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 695 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 724 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 774 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 755 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 733 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 716 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 770 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 625 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 669 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 786 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 775 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 596 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 695 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 717 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 596 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 781 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 575 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 757 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 722 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 592 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 643 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 711 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 651 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 766 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 854 Views

Reply to Message