Active Users:1060 Time:10/02/2026 10:15:10 PM
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense random thoughts Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM
I think it is crazy that people have trouble believing the jumbo jet we saw hit the building is the reason the reason the building fell but they seem willing to entertain the idea that some grand conspiracy that would have needed to include dozens if not hundreds of people is reasonable. I have yet to hear a theory that even come close to making any sense. Someone planted explosives in the building then recruited terrorist to hijack planes and fly them into the buildings? They knew they were going to hit the building and planted explosives in the buildings to make sure they went down? The motive element is where we see how truly stupid the theory is. Supposedly they did it to justify the war in Iraq but it never occurred to them to do it a way that linked Iraq to the attack????? If they were willing to kill 3000 Americans and send the economy into a tail spin wouldn't they have been willing to fake WMD's and a tie with Iraq?

I think the idea that we didn't really land on the moon has firmer footing than the "buildings can't fall like that" theory.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1375 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 915 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 951 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 871 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 994 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 931 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 836 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 999 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 878 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 930 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 1024 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 902 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 1005 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 820 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 862 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 878 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 940 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 919 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 898 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 935 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 760 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 931 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 869 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 995 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 804 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 842 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 1009 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 943 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 895 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 943 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 887 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 912 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 971 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 944 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 867 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 896 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 914 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 993 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 987 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 849 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 923 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 865 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 1010 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 418 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 864 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 893 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 883 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 859 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 891 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 898 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 466 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 916 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 780 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 942 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 814 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 839 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 908 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 819 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 958 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 450 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 862 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 391 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1081 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 880 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 1063 Views

Reply to Message