Active Users:1137 Time:02/08/2026 03:04:20 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms random thoughts Send a noteboard - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM
The president is the administration. The president sets the goals of the administration and if you want to claim an administration had a goal you need to show it was a gaol of the president. If you are simply referring to some members of the presidents staff you need to say that. You can't make blanket statements about the administration that don't include the president, sorry. The president is the administration.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. Tom - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1465 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. Timthetrolloc - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 986 Views
Ugh. Ghavrel - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 1021 Views
Re: Ugh. Timthetrolloc - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 959 Views
Something tells me that no matter who answered your questions you wouldn't believe anyway. everynametaken - 21/09/2011 02:16:52 AM 938 Views
this is a controlled demolition Timthetrolloc - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 1076 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. Tom - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 1003 Views
I've seen controlled demolitions in person. They happen in the opposite order of the WTC collapses. Ghavrel - 21/09/2011 03:54:35 AM 1019 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. ironclad - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 907 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. Timthetrolloc - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 1081 Views
Agreed Camilla - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 946 Views
I've long advocated this for the reasons Tom states as well as others. Joel - 21/09/2011 06:49:28 AM 882 Views
I don't know if the Internet is degrading skills, or just giving stupid people a voice beetnemesis - 20/09/2011 02:33:24 PM 1027 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 1007 Views
No, there is not. Tom - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 1113 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 985 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... Nate - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 1078 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? random thoughts - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 882 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. Nate - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 940 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 random thoughts - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 955 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. Nate - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 1031 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed random thoughts - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 989 Views
But that's what I DID argue. Nate - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 973 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms random thoughts - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 1025 Views
I've always seen them as separate. Nate - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 838 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it random thoughts - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 1001 Views
Heh. Nate - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 949 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. Joel - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 1076 Views
I'm still annoyed. Nate - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 871 Views
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate random thoughts - 21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM 883 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. Joel - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 917 Views
and I pointed that it was was just continuin gthe Clinton policy random thoughts - 21/09/2011 02:30:13 PM 957 Views
Even if that were true, it would still be flip flopping on a central Bush platform plank. Joel - 21/09/2011 05:45:10 PM 1004 Views
In addition: Nate - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 1086 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact random thoughts - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 1013 Views
This is very frustrating. Nate - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 963 Views
For the war on terror? Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 1016 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? random thoughts - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 965 Views
That contradicts the evidence. Tom - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 983 Views
Excuse me? Macharius - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 1045 Views
Huh? Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 1024 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense random thoughts - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 952 Views
Contemplate this.... Jeordam - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 980 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 999 Views
And how did you know... Jeordam - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 1058 Views
Re: And how did you know... Timthetrolloc - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 1056 Views
You should watch the pilot episode of the X-Files spin-off series The Lone Gunmen. TaskmasterJack - 20/09/2011 08:19:15 PM 1024 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking random thoughts - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 910 Views
Won't help Praziquantel - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 995 Views
Make 'em all take debate. nossy - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 950 Views
Would madam like a cane? Elaine - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 1082 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 452 Views
Do you think it would help? aerocontrols - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 944 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. Timthetrolloc - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 982 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? Tom - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 943 Views
Not actually the best example Isaac - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 945 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? random thoughts - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 959 Views
Wouldn't make much difference Isaac - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 972 Views
OK thanks *NM* random thoughts - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 503 Views
The fireproofing was scraped off the steel by the crash, so the beams melted. Aeryn - 21/09/2011 07:35:08 PM 1160 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? Timthetrolloc - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 991 Views
But how else would they fall down? Aeryn - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 864 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? Two Wongs - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 1008 Views
You could still argue. Vivien - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 892 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person Two Wongs - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 905 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. Vivien - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 980 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. Vivien - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 901 Views
I love geometry proofs. Nate - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 1029 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* LaSombra - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 501 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. Vivien - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 938 Views
+1 *NM* Isaac - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 431 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. jh - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1166 Views
Ha. Ha. Vivien - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 958 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. Tom - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 1141 Views
I really and truly appreciate your love of pure math for math's sake, but... Tom - 21/09/2011 11:10:03 PM 929 Views
Well, it requires a lot more science to really dispute things than HS can give someone Isaac - 21/09/2011 11:28:29 PM 954 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes