Active Users:710 Time:01/06/2026 08:49:41 AM
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense random thoughts Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM
I think it is crazy that people have trouble believing the jumbo jet we saw hit the building is the reason the reason the building fell but they seem willing to entertain the idea that some grand conspiracy that would have needed to include dozens if not hundreds of people is reasonable. I have yet to hear a theory that even come close to making any sense. Someone planted explosives in the building then recruited terrorist to hijack planes and fly them into the buildings? They knew they were going to hit the building and planted explosives in the buildings to make sure they went down? The motive element is where we see how truly stupid the theory is. Supposedly they did it to justify the war in Iraq but it never occurred to them to do it a way that linked Iraq to the attack????? If they were willing to kill 3000 Americans and send the economy into a tail spin wouldn't they have been willing to fake WMD's and a tie with Iraq?

I think the idea that we didn't really land on the moon has firmer footing than the "buildings can't fall like that" theory.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1423 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 959 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 1001 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 926 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 1043 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 974 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 883 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 1051 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 921 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 981 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 1088 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 955 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 1053 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 859 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 908 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 927 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 995 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 964 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 946 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 993 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 813 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 977 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 921 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 1043 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 848 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 888 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 1056 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 986 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 937 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 991 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 932 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 958 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 1022 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 994 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 927 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 949 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 969 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 1037 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 1033 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 890 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 972 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 920 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 1057 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 439 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 916 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 952 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 921 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 911 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 931 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 942 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 487 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 964 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 831 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 987 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 863 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 882 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 951 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 877 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 1002 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 473 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 911 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 412 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1139 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 931 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 1118 Views

Reply to Message