Active Users:631 Time:17/09/2025 04:50:42 AM
OK thanks *NM* random thoughts Send a noteboard - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM
If the exterior of the building was supplying most of the structural strength for the building then cutting a wide narrow gash in the side would significantly weaken the structure. The kinetic energy of the plane may not have had much of affect on the total mass of the building but it could have had a large impact on the section it hit. The kinetic energy of an ax is nothing compared to a tree but it is concentrated to one area it will bring the tree down.

You take the whole top 20 floors of a 100 story build and smash them up into rubble the lower 80 are still holding the same amount of weight, of course if you dump all that rubble on one spot of floor on floor 79 it's likely to fall through to 78 and carry that weight plus the floor down to 77 and so on, smashing and damaging as it goes, but that's another story. Whacking at the top of a tree with an ax generally will not knock it over. That's not to say the strike and accompanying damage weren't a factor, or that supports which might otherwise be fairly insulated from melting might not get exposed more directly through cracks from the strike, but I couldn't see it making much difference. I think people over complicate this, grab an old roof antenna or something else metal with lots of bits or spokes or whatever, and hang weight off it, non flammable weight, it sags a bit and stabilizes, now pour rubbing alcohol of kerosene on it and light it up, it will sag more and at a certain point bits are likely to snap off, then smack other bits on the way down and snap them off. Wrapping it up stone or whatever helps keeps the burning fuel off the metal but a good smack might open cracks for it to get in, and even without that, insulation generally works both ways, so to speak.

It's entirely possible that without all the broken windows, since those would have been sturdy material themselves, a fire couldn't have gotten air fast enough to heat the building up, I mean you need a god awful lot of oxygen to run a fire big and hot enough to do that, honestly off the top of my head I'd guess that breaking all those windows - along with delivery the fuel - were the only two real significant 'impacts' of the planes impact... however I am not an engineer or architect, so grain of salt and all. You figure as maybe previous fires in skyscrapers, Towering Inferno and all, probably contained enough flammable material in terms of raw heat production to parallel several thousand pounds of jet fuel but just couldn't get enough air to burn it fast enough to melt supports, couldn't really say.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1328 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 876 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 901 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 828 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 947 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 880 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 776 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 945 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 836 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 890 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 973 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 858 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 952 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 769 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 811 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 834 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 891 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 873 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 856 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 882 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 722 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 874 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 825 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 930 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 763 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 791 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 956 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 904 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 853 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 888 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 835 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 861 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 930 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 906 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 830 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 851 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 868 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 947 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 934 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 793 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 864 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 829 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 943 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 394 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 823 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 839 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 839 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 816 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 854 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 833 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 435 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 874 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 733 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 899 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 762 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 796 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 860 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 779 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 918 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 427 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 794 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 368 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1038 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 840 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 1007 Views

Reply to Message