Active Users:616 Time:13/12/2025 06:11:16 AM
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again. Joel Send a noteboard - 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM
He needs to learn to pick a horse and ride it instead of starting from a compromised position then fleeing to the right when they attack it. That scores no points and allays no fears with them, it just ensures the liberal base vital to his re-election is as enraged as the conservative base waiting for the GOP to tell them who to elect.

In this case, I happen to think it wrong to force private, particularly religious, institutions with a stated opposition to contraception to nonetheless pay for it. I would like a little clarification; an HHS "policy" or "rule" is not a federal LAW, so I am unsure what we are talking about here. Is it something that truly requires religious employers to pay for contraception, or another one of those "the feds partially fund you and you will not receive that money unless you do x" deals?

Politically though Obama is just doing another masterful job making the worst of a bad situation and outraging the entire political spectrum with a single issue.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up - 09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM 1937 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again. - 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM 965 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor - 10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM 867 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well. - 09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM 1040 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM 675 Views
Is there really such a thing? *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:11:30 PM 589 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post. - 09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM 982 Views
The subject line didn't help. *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:04:11 PM 620 Views
But it added some flair to the discussion! *NM* - 09/02/2012 07:46:47 PM 561 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM 569 Views
It's one thing to have a bias. - 09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM 1022 Views
Some would say putting a spotlight on it is more honest. *NM* - 09/02/2012 09:34:17 PM 540 Views
Ah, the Rupert Murdoch School of Objectivity. - 09/02/2012 10:15:57 PM 958 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms. - 09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM 825 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly. - 10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM 1839 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention? - 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM 2289 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote. - 10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM 2335 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course. - 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM 2137 Views
Bullshit. - 11/02/2012 04:29:31 AM 2491 Views
A vote for no one is a vote for more BS. - 11/02/2012 05:55:11 AM 2204 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end. - 10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM 2397 Views
He is already preparing to cave. - 10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM 2364 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said. - 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM 2156 Views
"And here I thought he was just another politician." - 10/02/2012 01:29:36 PM 2229 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved. - 10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM 2368 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions? - 10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM 934 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs. - 10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM 1109 Views
Money is not the same as speech! - 10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM 835 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong - 10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM 1109 Views
One last point - 10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM 1190 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes. - 11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM 935 Views
You argument does not make sense - 11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM 826 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency. - 11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM 940 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality - 11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM 1085 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM 1052 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM 2264 Views
In other words, I could. - 11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM 777 Views
Some more points - 11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM 1076 Views
Sex is not a necessity either. - 11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM 1048 Views
I can't believe you just said that - 11/02/2012 04:30:12 AM 860 Views
The widespread inability to believe that is deeply worrisome. - 11/02/2012 06:33:01 AM 1071 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a in it ) - 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM 1082 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained. - 11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM 1002 Views
The polls disagree with you. - 11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM 943 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls. - 11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM 1012 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway - 11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM 1107 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad. - 11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM 813 Views
you have, sort of. - 11/02/2012 08:23:25 PM 1057 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is - 11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM 983 Views
Nossy that was not Joel, that was me - 11/02/2012 01:56:39 PM 995 Views
I know that. - 11/02/2012 03:23:32 PM 1036 Views
Understood. - 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM 917 Views
mmm... - 11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM 1003 Views

Reply to Message