Active Users:528 Time:13/10/2025 09:52:27 PM
Then that article is wrong. Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 01:43:40 AM
See the WaPo article below.

And here’s how it works after the compromise: “Our policy is saying that the Catholic hospital doesn’t want to cover contraceptives, and they don’t include that in their policy. It also says that Aetna needs to provide contraceptive services for free to workers in the plan. Aetna sets the premium, but it cannot be higher than it would have been without birth control. The premium does not include contraception.”

And, in the end, that leaves Aetna with the bill. “There is a sort of bank account,” says the official, “and Aetna is sucking it up.”
The White House explains its contraceptives compromise
Reply to message
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up - 09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM 1900 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again. - 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM 926 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor - 10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM 813 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well. - 09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM 995 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM 665 Views
Is there really such a thing? *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:11:30 PM 573 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post. - 09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM 940 Views
The subject line didn't help. *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:04:11 PM 598 Views
But it added some flair to the discussion! *NM* - 09/02/2012 07:46:47 PM 538 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM 555 Views
It's one thing to have a bias. - 09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM 981 Views
Some would say putting a spotlight on it is more honest. *NM* - 09/02/2012 09:34:17 PM 514 Views
Ah, the Rupert Murdoch School of Objectivity. - 09/02/2012 10:15:57 PM 921 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms. - 09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM 792 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly. - 10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM 1802 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention? - 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM 2245 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote. - 10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM 2288 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course. - 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM 2097 Views
Bullshit. - 11/02/2012 04:29:31 AM 2444 Views
A vote for no one is a vote for more BS. - 11/02/2012 05:55:11 AM 2163 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end. - 10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM 2342 Views
He is already preparing to cave. - 10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM 2333 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said. - 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM 2113 Views
"And here I thought he was just another politician." - 10/02/2012 01:29:36 PM 2192 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved. - 10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM 2333 Views
No, you don't have to buy it from insurers. You get it for free, just like everyone else will. *NM* - 10/02/2012 09:55:53 PM 1891 Views
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer." - 11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM 2339 Views
Then that article is wrong. - 11/02/2012 01:43:40 AM 2282 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions? - 10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM 894 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs. - 10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM 1080 Views
Money is not the same as speech! - 10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM 798 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong - 10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM 1048 Views
One last point - 10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM 1141 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes. - 11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM 915 Views
You argument does not make sense - 11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM 794 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency. - 11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM 913 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality - 11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM 1029 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM 990 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM 2212 Views
In other words, I could. - 11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM 723 Views
Some more points - 11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM 1043 Views
Sex is not a necessity either. - 11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM 1003 Views
I can't believe you just said that - 11/02/2012 04:30:12 AM 833 Views
The widespread inability to believe that is deeply worrisome. - 11/02/2012 06:33:01 AM 1000 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a in it ) - 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM 1031 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained. - 11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM 961 Views
The polls disagree with you. - 11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM 900 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls. - 11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM 954 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway - 11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM 1076 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad. - 11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM 763 Views
you have, sort of. - 11/02/2012 08:23:25 PM 1021 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is - 11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM 954 Views
Nossy that was not Joel, that was me - 11/02/2012 01:56:39 PM 957 Views
I know that. - 11/02/2012 03:23:32 PM 981 Views
Understood. - 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM 892 Views
mmm... - 11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM 955 Views

Reply to Message