Active Users:166 Time:14/06/2024 04:36:25 AM
Indeed Cannoli Send a noteboard - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM
Nobody should be bound to define their mutually consensual relationships with other adults of sound mind unless the state has a undeniably clear reason to butt their noses in, like a legal contract for custody or cohabitation or shared assets, etc. Now religion or personal? Different story, plural marriage is immoral in my opinion and nobody has a right to make me personally recognize it as valid.
And that right there is the crux of the marriage debate. Let them pile up in a multi-person bed, or cornhole each other behind closed doors. Just do not expect me to call a spade anything but a spade, and don't expect me to call it a spade if it isn't. Two or more women or two or more men involved in any way shape or form is not a marriage. End of story, and no one has the right to force me to call it as such.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1324 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 728 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 702 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 679 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 688 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 614 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 370 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 690 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 401 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 355 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 351 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 654 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 347 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 658 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 677 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 627 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 702 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 618 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 713 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 543 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 638 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 744 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 626 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 621 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 689 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 747 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1011 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 654 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 818 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 700 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 631 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 561 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 565 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 644 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 290 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 530 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 733 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 626 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 659 Views

Reply to Message