Active Users:1410 Time:29/10/2025 01:33:37 PM
Indeed Cannoli Send a noteboard - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM
Nobody should be bound to define their mutually consensual relationships with other adults of sound mind unless the state has a undeniably clear reason to butt their noses in, like a legal contract for custody or cohabitation or shared assets, etc. Now religion or personal? Different story, plural marriage is immoral in my opinion and nobody has a right to make me personally recognize it as valid.
And that right there is the crux of the marriage debate. Let them pile up in a multi-person bed, or cornhole each other behind closed doors. Just do not expect me to call a spade anything but a spade, and don't expect me to call it a spade if it isn't. Two or more women or two or more men involved in any way shape or form is not a marriage. End of story, and no one has the right to force me to call it as such.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1509 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 905 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 883 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 872 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 862 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 787 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 535 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 849 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 566 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 437 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 438 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 898 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 426 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 845 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 858 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 805 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 879 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 794 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 891 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 705 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 835 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 921 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 802 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 806 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 873 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 937 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1213 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 829 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 1029 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 885 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 805 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 746 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 747 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 827 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 371 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 718 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 945 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 808 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 853 Views

Reply to Message