This is a military struggle, between a nation and her allies and an army of religious extremists whose tactics include terrorism. alQaeda is an army, not a terrorist group. Unfortunately, they've been mislabeled. 
This war is basically being fought because alQaeda and the other groups who adhere to the form of weaponized Islam that bin Laden & Co are peddling feel they have a religious and moral obligation to fight the U.S. for several reasons. They aren't killing cause they like to, they aren't killing because they're insane, they're killing because of issues such as (off the top of my head) U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, U.S. support for secular (and oppressive) regimes in Arab countries, U.S. support for Israel, and U.S. economic sanctions on Iraq in the 90's. It isn't organized crime, it's a war, and this trial proves that the people in charge of leading America during this war are definitely not in the right frame of mind.
This war is basically being fought because alQaeda and the other groups who adhere to the form of weaponized Islam that bin Laden & Co are peddling feel they have a religious and moral obligation to fight the U.S. for several reasons. They aren't killing cause they like to, they aren't killing because they're insane, they're killing because of issues such as (off the top of my head) U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, U.S. support for secular (and oppressive) regimes in Arab countries, U.S. support for Israel, and U.S. economic sanctions on Iraq in the 90's. It isn't organized crime, it's a war, and this trial proves that the people in charge of leading America during this war are definitely not in the right frame of mind.
that all terrorist groups have political reasons for their deeds. That's pretty much part of the definition of terrorism - using violence in order to make a political entity do something you want. There's no "mislabeling" about it.
I agree that the rules and laws governing civil justice in the US - some of which are, as I've argued before on these boards, seriously exaggerated in favour of the defendant - shouldn't apply to al Qaeda prisoners captured abroad, though, and trying them in military courts may well be the best alternative. If they're captured in the US, otoh, I'm not sure what makes them different from e.g. Timothy McVeigh.
			No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden?
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM
	        1210 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
			oO uhm, what?
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM
	        681 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			If they're tried INSIDE the US, then yes, they are entitled to due process.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 01:44:08 AM
	        586 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
			Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM
	        707 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM
	        702 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM
	        634 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			If this trial were being held in any other country
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM
	        645 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM
	        672 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM
	        563 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Spare me the bullshit.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM
	        563 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			I will if you will.  - 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
	        695 Views
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
	        695 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
	        695 Views
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
	        695 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			No, you won't.  You never will.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM
	        561 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem.
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM
	        647 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM
	        631 Views
	        
	
		
		
	
	    		
			Allow me to point out...
		
	         - 20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM
	        598 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM
	        637 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM
	        577 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one  - 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
	        612 Views
	    
	         - 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
	        612 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	     - 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
	        612 Views
	    
	         - 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
	        612 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Military struggles involve militaries.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM
	        754 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Once again, bullshit.
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM
	        720 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
			This is wrong
	    
	         - 20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM
	        608 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli.
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM
	        686 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad...
	    
	         - 22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM
	        738 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			I understand your "jihadist narrative"
	    
	         - 22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM
	        743 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			No you don't
	    
	         - 22/11/2009 11:16:18 PM
	        661 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Oh, so you know better than Army attorneys about Miranda rights?
	    
	         - 22/11/2009 11:52:00 PM
	        689 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			I can explain it to you right now if you want?
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 08:21:48 AM
	        611 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 02:56:19 PM
	        703 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
	    
	         - 24/11/2009 04:55:12 AM
	        826 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			I'm glad that you will never be in a position where a decision you make can affect my life.
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 12:27:35 AM
	        558 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life.
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM
	        689 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Please explain to me how military tribunals compromise my principles?
	    
	         - 24/11/2009 02:54:18 AM
	        557 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality.
	    
	         - 22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM
	        582 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM
	        809 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without  our censorship.
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM
	        734 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America.
	    
	         - 24/11/2009 02:57:13 AM
	        624 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			"My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. "
	    
	         - 24/11/2009 06:57:34 AM
	        659 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years...
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM
	        674 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM
	        552 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			And I've responded to yours
	    
	         - 24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM
	        622 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			It's not, at least for me, that we feel the civilian courts are inadequate
	    
	         - 24/11/2009 05:28:51 AM
	        617 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			Good analysis of the situation.
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM
	        723 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy.
	    
	         - 24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM
	        707 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			No.  It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists.
	    
	         - 24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM
	        595 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			enemy combatants and terrorists  - 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
	        687 Views
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
	        687 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
	        687 Views
	    
	         - 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
	        687 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists.
	    
	         - 24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM
	        822 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 