Active Users:732 Time:23/02/2026 11:54:57 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life. Libby Send a noteboard - 23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM
Your point seems to be that we should damage our fighting capabilities in hopes that our enemies will change their minds when they see how fair we are to them? I won't go as far as to say that you're a retarded half-wit, but I will say that you seem to be delusional and naive :)


I don't need to be in a position to do that, someone else already is. Sucks to be you. The fact of the matter is, you have not provided any credible legal or moral justification for not trying terrorists in civilian court, eventough we've already have tried terrorists in civilian court already and they are now rotting behind bars.

Weakness is allowing terrorists to cow you into compromising your principles.

This message last edited by Libby on 23/11/2009 at 08:31:02 AM
Reply to message
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden? beckstcw - 20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM 1258 Views
oO uhm, what? LadyLorraine - 20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM 723 Views
If they're tried INSIDE the US, then yes, they are entitled to due process. Tom - 20/11/2009 01:44:08 AM 622 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started. The Name With No Man - 20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM 746 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession. LadyLorraine - 20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM 739 Views
As it seems we will. The Name With No Man - 24/11/2009 09:41:18 AM 725 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial Tom - 20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM 672 Views
Its to salve their conscinse Ryan - 20/11/2009 01:55:08 AM 679 Views
That's exactly the problem! beckstcw - 20/11/2009 01:58:37 AM 686 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country beckstcw - 20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM 677 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM 707 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended. Joel - 20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM 604 Views
Spare me the bullshit. Tom - 20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM 597 Views
I will if you will. Joel - 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM 733 Views
No, you won't. You never will. Tom - 20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM 600 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem. Joel - 23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM 683 Views
No, that's not right. You don't read very closely. Tom - 23/11/2009 02:21:54 PM 614 Views
In this case my reading comprehension is more than adequate. Joel - 24/11/2009 09:16:39 AM 646 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow. beckstcw - 20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM 666 Views
Allow me to point out... Legolas - 20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM 639 Views
Well, Timothy McVeigh was in OUR Army. The Name With No Man - 20/11/2009 03:55:18 PM 756 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group beckstcw - 20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM 681 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance. Legolas - 20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM 622 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one beckstcw - 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM 663 Views
Yes. "Terrorist group". Legolas - 21/11/2009 12:02:04 PM 702 Views
Yeah I guess you're right beckstcw - 22/11/2009 01:34:34 AM 620 Views
Military struggles involve militaries. Joel - 20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM 793 Views
Once again, bullshit. Tom - 20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM 758 Views
Aaaah, I see; it's a question of who's the master, is it? Joel - 23/11/2009 07:47:43 AM 800 Views
You're wasting your time Tom - 23/11/2009 02:24:57 PM 653 Views
This is wrong Isaac - 20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM 647 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli. Joel - 23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM 734 Views
Nevertheless, uniforms or a nation is not a requirement Isaac - 23/11/2009 03:09:22 PM 658 Views
Rightly or wrongly, I disagree. Joel - 24/11/2009 08:48:25 AM 718 Views
That is bad AgentOrange - 21/11/2009 12:31:04 AM 636 Views
You're not going far enough, man. Joel - 20/11/2009 11:03:08 AM 691 Views
Blah blah blah blah blah *NM* Tom - 20/11/2009 01:57:39 PM 290 Views
I just can't imagine how they expect to get a fair trial. Gher - 20/11/2009 03:17:28 AM 615 Views
The Code of Conduct Isaac - 20/11/2009 07:23:02 PM 749 Views
The mention of God is interesting. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/11/2009 05:24:14 AM 411 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad... Libby - 22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM 774 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative" beckstcw - 22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM 794 Views
No you don't Libby - 22/11/2009 11:16:18 PM 705 Views
Oh, so you know better than Army attorneys about Miranda rights? Tom - 22/11/2009 11:52:00 PM 730 Views
I find no mention of Miranda in that article. Joel - 23/11/2009 08:13:05 AM 737 Views
I can explain it to you right now if you want? Libby - 23/11/2009 08:21:48 AM 650 Views
Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court: Tom - 23/11/2009 02:56:19 PM 740 Views
Re: Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court: Libby - 24/11/2009 04:55:12 AM 867 Views
I'm glad that you will never be in a position where a decision you make can affect my life. beckstcw - 23/11/2009 12:27:35 AM 596 Views
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life. Libby - 23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM 724 Views
Please explain to me how military tribunals compromise my principles? beckstcw - 24/11/2009 02:54:18 AM 595 Views
And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality. Tom - 22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM 617 Views
Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy beckstcw - 23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM 849 Views
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship. Joel - 23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM 775 Views
My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. beckstcw - 24/11/2009 02:57:13 AM 660 Views
"My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. " Joel - 24/11/2009 06:57:34 AM 689 Views
We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years... Libby - 23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM 719 Views
I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here Tom - 23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM 590 Views
And I've responded to yours Libby - 24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM 662 Views
It's not, at least for me, that we feel the civilian courts are inadequate beckstcw - 24/11/2009 05:28:51 AM 652 Views
Good analysis of the situation. Joel - 23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM 762 Views
It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy. beckstcw - 24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM 744 Views
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists. Joel - 24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM 633 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists imlad - 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM 728 Views
They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists. Joel - 24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM 855 Views
not every soldier in history has worn a uniform imlad - 24/11/2009 11:00:34 PM 538 Views
One example would be Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys imlad - 25/11/2009 06:23:08 PM 711 Views
Just for fun, let's call them fundamentalist vigilantes. *NM* Vodalus - 24/11/2009 11:12:09 PM 266 Views
Works for me. Joel - 01/12/2009 09:12:29 AM 678 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes