I'm arguing against expensive, media circus, drawn out trials in the United States where criminal procedure violations can lead to sentences being overturned. Our soldiers did not use those procedures and evidence was collected in ways that domestic courts would not recognize, but military courts would.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden?
20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM
- 1147 Views
oO uhm, what?
20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM
- 632 Views
If they're tried INSIDE the US, then yes, they are entitled to due process.
20/11/2009 01:44:08 AM
- 539 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started.
20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM
- 655 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession.
20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM
- 655 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial
20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM
- 585 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country
20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM
- 602 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it.
20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM
- 629 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended.
20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM
- 518 Views
Spare me the bullshit.
20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM
- 518 Views
I will if you will.
20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
- 618 Views

No, you won't. You never will.
20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM
- 514 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem.
23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM
- 602 Views
No, that's not right. You don't read very closely.
23/11/2009 02:21:54 PM
- 525 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow.
20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM
- 559 Views
Allow me to point out...
20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM
- 548 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group
20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM
- 588 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance.
20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM
- 532 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one
21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
- 550 Views

Military struggles involve militaries.
20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM
- 705 Views
Once again, bullshit.
20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM
- 672 Views
This is wrong
20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM
- 568 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli.
23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM
- 622 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad...
22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM
- 682 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative"
22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM
- 673 Views
No you don't
22/11/2009 11:16:18 PM
- 605 Views
Oh, so you know better than Army attorneys about Miranda rights?
22/11/2009 11:52:00 PM
- 645 Views
I can explain it to you right now if you want?
23/11/2009 08:21:48 AM
- 564 Views
Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
23/11/2009 02:56:19 PM
- 618 Views
Re: Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
24/11/2009 04:55:12 AM
- 758 Views
I'm glad that you will never be in a position where a decision you make can affect my life.
23/11/2009 12:27:35 AM
- 509 Views
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life.
23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM
- 643 Views
Please explain to me how military tribunals compromise my principles?
24/11/2009 02:54:18 AM
- 513 Views
And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality.
22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM
- 535 Views
Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy
23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM
- 763 Views
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship.
23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM
- 660 Views
My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America.
24/11/2009 02:57:13 AM
- 580 Views
"My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. "
24/11/2009 06:57:34 AM
- 589 Views
We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years...
23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM
- 608 Views
I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here
23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM
- 504 Views
And I've responded to yours
24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM
- 584 Views
It's not, at least for me, that we feel the civilian courts are inadequate
24/11/2009 05:28:51 AM
- 571 Views
Good analysis of the situation.
23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM
- 677 Views
It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy.
24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM
- 629 Views
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists.
24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM
- 546 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists
23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
- 637 Views

They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists.
24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM
- 764 Views