I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here
Tom Send a noteboard - 23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM
I am not defending the Bush Administration or its abysmal policies, which did lead us to the position we are in today.
However, there is no reason we should spend the money associated with a Federal trial if we can have a radically less expensive military tribunal pursue the matter.
However, there is no reason we should spend the money associated with a Federal trial if we can have a radically less expensive military tribunal pursue the matter.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden?
- 20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM
1273 Views
oO uhm, what?
- 20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM
741 Views
If they're tried INSIDE the US, then yes, they are entitled to due process.
- 20/11/2009 01:44:08 AM
636 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started.
- 20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM
761 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession.
- 20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM
756 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial
- 20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM
689 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country
- 20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM
688 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it.
- 20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM
722 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended.
- 20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM
618 Views
Spare me the bullshit.
- 20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM
613 Views
I will if you will. 
- 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
743 Views
- 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
743 Views
No, you won't. You never will.
- 20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM
606 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem.
- 23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM
696 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow.
- 20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM
676 Views
Allow me to point out...
- 20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM
655 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group
- 20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM
698 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance.
- 20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM
639 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one 
- 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
679 Views
- 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
679 Views
Military struggles involve militaries.
- 20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM
812 Views
Once again, bullshit.
- 20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM
770 Views
This is wrong
- 20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM
665 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli.
- 23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM
750 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad...
- 22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM
791 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative"
- 22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM
805 Views
No you don't
- 22/11/2009 11:16:18 PM
717 Views
Oh, so you know better than Army attorneys about Miranda rights?
- 22/11/2009 11:52:00 PM
747 Views
I can explain it to you right now if you want?
- 23/11/2009 08:21:48 AM
666 Views
Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
- 23/11/2009 02:56:19 PM
754 Views
Re: Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
- 24/11/2009 04:55:12 AM
883 Views
I'm glad that you will never be in a position where a decision you make can affect my life.
- 23/11/2009 12:27:35 AM
613 Views
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life.
- 23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM
741 Views
Please explain to me how military tribunals compromise my principles?
- 24/11/2009 02:54:18 AM
609 Views
And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality.
- 22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM
630 Views
Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy
- 23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM
867 Views
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship.
- 23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM
788 Views
My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America.
- 24/11/2009 02:57:13 AM
672 Views
"My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. "
- 24/11/2009 06:57:34 AM
704 Views
We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years...
- 23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM
735 Views
I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here
- 23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM
605 Views
And I've responded to yours
- 24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM
675 Views
It's not, at least for me, that we feel the civilian courts are inadequate
- 24/11/2009 05:28:51 AM
668 Views
Good analysis of the situation.
- 23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM
773 Views
It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy.
- 24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM
754 Views
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists.
- 24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM
642 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists 
- 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
742 Views
- 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
742 Views
They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists.
- 24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM
874 Views