The fact that is was a well written female character and if it was a male character the story wouldn't have been that different is what makes it so awesome and yes, feminist. That is what a feminist movie looks like. I'm glad you enjoyed it! That is what feminism is all about.
"(except that less females would have been interested in this)". Do you really think this? Like less "females" were into Harry Potter?
"(except that less females would have been interested in this)". Do you really think this? Like less "females" were into Harry Potter?
I wouldn't have enjoyed if it had been the preachy "females can be as strong and cool as guys" kinda story. It wasn't.
The fact that it has a female heroine was entirely insignificant for the theme and the story of the film. Yes, it's nice to see a well written young female character. But it could have been a boy as well and not much would have changed (except that less females would have been interested in this).
It was far from being a flawless film (or book, probably) but this (or his racism point, which I don't even get) are hardly points to bring up against it.
The fact that it has a female heroine was entirely insignificant for the theme and the story of the film. Yes, it's nice to see a well written young female character. But it could have been a boy as well and not much would have changed (except that less females would have been interested in this).
It was far from being a flawless film (or book, probably) but this (or his racism point, which I don't even get) are hardly points to bring up against it.
This message has been locked.
This message last edited by Vivien on 03/04/2012 at 07:43:48 PM
This message last edited by Vivien on 03/04/2012 at 07:43:48 PM
- Edit 1 by Vivien on 03/04/2012 at 07:43:48 PM
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
- 03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
2457 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
- 03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
1206 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
- 03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
1162 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
- 04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
1033 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
- 03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
1125 Views
Where do I start?
- 03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
1127 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
- 04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
1128 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
- 03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
1020 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
- 03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
1123 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
- 04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
1030 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
- 04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
1093 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
- 04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
1097 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
- 04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
1007 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
- 04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
1079 Views
Fair enough
- 04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
1127 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
- 04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
1013 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
- 04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
1067 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
- 04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
1020 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
- 04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
938 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
- 04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
1035 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
- 04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
1082 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
- 04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
991 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
- 04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
962 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
- 04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
1197 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
- 04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
938 Views
That's not what I said.
- 04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
1107 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
- 06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
999 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
- 09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
1070 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
- 06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
1039 Views
Nope. (edit)
- 06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
1035 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
- 07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
1096 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
- 07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
969 Views
Ok.
- 07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
1281 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
- 07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
977 Views
- 07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
977 Views
However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
- 05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
945 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
- 05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
1036 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
- 06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
1122 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
- 04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
988 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
- 04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
1016 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
- 04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
970 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing?
*NM*
- 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
987 Views
*NM*
- 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
987 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
- 05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
1049 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
- 05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
916 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
- 05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
964 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
- 06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
1011 Views
Fascinating.
- 06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
1012 Views
Re: Fascinating.
- 07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
1015 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
- 07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
1000 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
- 07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
1070 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
- 07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
936 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
- 07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
973 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
- 09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
990 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
- 06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
856 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
- 09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
982 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
- 04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
1035 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
- 04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
981 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
- 03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
957 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
- 04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
1028 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
- 04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
1063 Views
