Active Users:425 Time:17/09/2025 03:12:25 PM
To be fair Artsapat Send a noteboard - 04/04/2012 02:37:25 PM
you have a situation where you admit that you're not familiar with the source material, then there's an article written by someone unfamiliar with the source material, and people who are familiar with the source material say that the article is garbage and... your conclusion is "I can imagine it to be true". This is when we laugh.


The review was not written by a person unfamiliar with the source material. From what I read he had read the book and seen the movie.
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review. - 03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM 2364 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes" - 03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM 1128 Views
Ok, I did and basically it's garbage. *NM* - 03/04/2012 04:53:00 PM 940 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet - 03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM 1077 Views
No, it's totally off. *NM* - 03/04/2012 05:39:03 PM 952 Views
fair enough. like I said, I haven't read it yet. *NM* - 03/04/2012 07:20:34 PM 879 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist. - 03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM 1046 Views
Where do I start? - 03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM 1054 Views
Hermoine was the most kick ass of the Potter kids. - 04/04/2012 03:08:17 AM 911 Views
So? Hunger Games has lots of male characters. - 04/04/2012 05:30:21 AM 973 Views
His racism point... - 04/04/2012 02:32:43 PM 856 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying - 03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM 950 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist? - 03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM 1061 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist? - 04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM 951 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical. - 04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM 1022 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph - 04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM 993 Views
Re: Completely agree with your first paragraph - 04/04/2012 01:43:55 PM 961 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out - 04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM 1002 Views
Fair enough - 04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM 1043 Views
Stop using female as a noun! - 04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM 948 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred - 04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM 961 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one. - 04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM 945 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though - 04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM 877 Views
Thank you! - 04/04/2012 08:03:38 PM 986 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds. - 04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM 964 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over - 04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM 1011 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize. - 04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM 916 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory - 04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM 890 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM 1127 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly... - 04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM 861 Views
That's not what I said. - 04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM 973 Views
I'm going to have to just outright disagree with you then. *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:54:25 PM 909 Views
If I wanted to be accusatory... - 04/04/2012 11:05:37 PM 927 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears) - 06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM 956 Views
Nope. (edit) - 06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM 942 Views
Re: Nope. (edit) - 07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM 1012 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse. - 07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM 894 Views
Ok. - 07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM 1190 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one. - 05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM 952 Views
I think the language difference is really interesting. - 05/04/2012 03:13:03 PM 963 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words - 06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM 1030 Views
LOL! You don't say... - 06/04/2012 05:06:20 PM 924 Views
LOL u so mad - 06/04/2012 06:19:28 PM 913 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind. - 04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM 916 Views
My dear - 09/04/2012 01:07:34 PM 981 Views
LOL - 09/04/2012 01:57:53 PM 804 Views
guess what, it is a noun. *NM* - 04/04/2012 07:26:39 PM 789 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM 919 Views
well it's important that you say "female human" - 04/04/2012 09:28:45 PM 914 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM 900 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing? *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM 914 Views
No, I have issues with words that begin with the letter f. - 04/04/2012 11:09:45 PM 943 Views
ooookay then. - 04/04/2012 11:11:23 PM 996 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun! - 05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM 855 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here. - 05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM 892 Views
For the record, I certainly don't think you're crazy town. - 05/04/2012 07:23:18 PM 914 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that. - 06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM 938 Views
Fascinating. - 06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM 952 Views
Re: Fascinating. - 07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM 936 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references. - 07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM 931 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is? - 07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM 993 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong. - 07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM 870 Views
Sorry, no. Read better. - 07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM 903 Views
*deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here. - 07/04/2012 06:38:08 PM 886 Views
Re: *deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here. - 07/04/2012 09:26:34 PM 1026 Views
Aha, we found the problem - 09/04/2012 01:03:35 PM 1001 Views
You're being disingenuous. - 09/04/2012 12:57:38 PM 917 Views
To be fair - 04/04/2012 02:37:25 PM 949 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM 976 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM 924 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 07:51:46 PM 925 Views
This - 05/04/2012 12:20:04 AM 920 Views
I got half way through the review and got bored. - 04/04/2012 03:09:58 AM 909 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers* - 04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM 957 Views
I think that might be debatable - 05/04/2012 06:59:35 PM 936 Views
She still made plenty of choices and she did choose to kill. - 05/04/2012 07:13:47 PM 878 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character - 04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM 981 Views
Out of curiosity (this off topic) - 04/04/2012 07:32:25 PM 888 Views
Rachel, of course. - 05/04/2012 12:17:41 AM 953 Views
Well. Now I've actually seen it. (mild spoilers) - 09/04/2012 12:17:03 AM 992 Views