I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
Female is the MEDICAL TERM FOR FEMALE.
It's like getting offended over the word vagina, or penis. Or breast.
And woman is not all inclusive. It does not include female children. Mare:woman::Filly:girl. Not to mention that, if I understand correctly, it's a term far more open to conflict with "gender issues".
It just doesn't make any sense to me. Maybe it's because I'm a veterinary student and I spend all day calling things male/female/neutered/spayed/intact/whatever. I'm used to referring to things by their definitions. It's just making a mountain out of a molehill to me.
What I really do not understand is if the term female offends you so much..why does it make a difference whether it's used as a noun or an adjective? Why is okay to describe the gender of a group of individuals if they all have something else in common like profession or hobby? What if the only relevant commonality is their sex? I'm sorry, but I just don't see how Jens actually transgressed any rule besides "don't gross the tiny lines the PC police has drawn". He wasn't trying to be rude (English isn't even his first damned language) and he wasn't saying anything disparaging.
If you're going to make an issue out of the use of a term, at least have the sense to make sure it's a good example so that people don't just see you has being hypersensitive over nothing. Don't get me wrong, I understand that people use the term disparagingly (just like they use the term "male" disparagingly at times), but that can be done with almost any word. I can say "bananas coconuts and grapes" with a mocking voice and you'll know what I think of Tarzan of the Apes!!
It's like getting offended over the word vagina, or penis. Or breast.
And woman is not all inclusive. It does not include female children. Mare:woman::Filly:girl. Not to mention that, if I understand correctly, it's a term far more open to conflict with "gender issues".
It just doesn't make any sense to me. Maybe it's because I'm a veterinary student and I spend all day calling things male/female/neutered/spayed/intact/whatever. I'm used to referring to things by their definitions. It's just making a mountain out of a molehill to me.
What I really do not understand is if the term female offends you so much..why does it make a difference whether it's used as a noun or an adjective? Why is okay to describe the gender of a group of individuals if they all have something else in common like profession or hobby? What if the only relevant commonality is their sex? I'm sorry, but I just don't see how Jens actually transgressed any rule besides "don't gross the tiny lines the PC police has drawn". He wasn't trying to be rude (English isn't even his first damned language) and he wasn't saying anything disparaging.
If you're going to make an issue out of the use of a term, at least have the sense to make sure it's a good example so that people don't just see you has being hypersensitive over nothing. Don't get me wrong, I understand that people use the term disparagingly (just like they use the term "male" disparagingly at times), but that can be done with almost any word. I can say "bananas coconuts and grapes" with a mocking voice and you'll know what I think of Tarzan of the Apes!!
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message has been locked.
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 04/04/2012 at 09:34:02 PM
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 04/04/2012 at 09:34:02 PM
- Edit 2 by LadyLorraine on 04/04/2012 at 09:34:02 PM
- Edit 1 by LadyLorraine on 04/04/2012 at 09:27:26 PM
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
- 03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
2436 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
- 03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
1195 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
- 03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
1148 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
- 04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
1016 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
- 03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
1110 Views
Where do I start?
- 03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
1112 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
- 04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
1111 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
- 03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
1007 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
- 03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
1107 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
- 04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
1011 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
- 04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
1074 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
- 04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
1073 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
- 04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
992 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
- 04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
1060 Views
Fair enough
- 04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
1110 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
- 04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
999 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
- 04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
1050 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
- 04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
998 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
- 04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
922 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
- 04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
1022 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
- 04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
1062 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
- 04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
974 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
- 04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
949 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
- 04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
1179 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
- 04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
919 Views
That's not what I said.
- 04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
1088 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
- 06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
983 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
- 09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
1050 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
- 06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
1016 Views
Nope. (edit)
- 06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
1017 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
- 07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
1079 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
- 07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
949 Views
Ok.
- 07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
1261 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
- 07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
959 Views
- 07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
959 Views
However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
- 05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
928 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
- 05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
1015 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
- 06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
1103 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
- 04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
971 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
- 04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
995 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
- 04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
952 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing?
*NM*
- 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
968 Views
*NM*
- 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
968 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
- 05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
1029 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
- 05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
898 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
- 05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
945 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
- 06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
991 Views
Fascinating.
- 06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
993 Views
Re: Fascinating.
- 07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
997 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
- 07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
983 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
- 07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
1044 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
- 07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
924 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
- 07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
954 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
- 09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
975 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
- 06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
840 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
- 09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
969 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
- 04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
1023 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
- 04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
967 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
- 03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
942 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
- 04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
1011 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
- 04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
1050 Views
