Active Users:954 Time:31/01/2026 06:33:01 PM
*deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here. Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/04/2012 06:38:08 PM
I wrote a long reply with paragraphs that dealt with all of your points, some of them agreeing, others pointing out how you're wrong or at least highly disingenuous, and yes, also one admitting that Vivien's statement about grammar was factually wrong (I admitted my own factual errors already). Might as well delete the lot of it and focus on what matters, though.
(1) It is ungrammatical to use "female" as a noun and "female" also carries with it universally a connotation of reproductive biology that is reductive, so therefore you should never use female as a noun.

Versus:

(2) Even though you can use "female" as a noun and the connotation today among American speakers is as an effectively harmless synonym for "woman", the word "female" has a history of being used with reference to a female's biology exclusively and for some today this connotation still holds, so therefore it is advisable and preferable to use "woman" over "female" as a noun, just to be on the safe side, so to speak.

There is certainly a difference between those two. But if people walk away from this argument just remembering your statement number 2, with the single addition of the word "many" or "most" between "among" and "American speakers", I think we can all be content. Or as content as we can be without having seen hard data on how widespread exactly the connotation is, anyway.
The citations Vivien supplied absolutely support that second claim. I completely agree with it, and will in the future take care to heed this advice. But the second claim was not the original one that Vivien made, the one that she and you still seem to stand by and the one I've been arguing against The two statements make very, very different factual claims and significantly different normative judgments. There are at least three solid points of disagreement that I took up with Vivien and you and others. I can always enumerate them propositionally if you want. In any case, there you have it.

Nobody ever made your statement number 1. I made part of it and retracted it; Vivien made another part of it and can speak for herself, though I for one don't think she meant it that way. The third part of it is inherently subjective so it's not actually a "claim".

As far as I can tell, everybody involved in this argument learned something out of it, excepting Celia, and your statement 2 comes as close to a consensus as anything I've seen, so seems like a good closing note.
Reply to message
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review. - 03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM 2436 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes" - 03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM 1194 Views
Ok, I did and basically it's garbage. *NM* - 03/04/2012 04:53:00 PM 1022 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet - 03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM 1148 Views
No, it's totally off. *NM* - 03/04/2012 05:39:03 PM 1002 Views
fair enough. like I said, I haven't read it yet. *NM* - 03/04/2012 07:20:34 PM 942 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist. - 03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM 1110 Views
Where do I start? - 03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM 1112 Views
Hermoine was the most kick ass of the Potter kids. - 04/04/2012 03:08:17 AM 966 Views
So? Hunger Games has lots of male characters. - 04/04/2012 05:30:21 AM 1018 Views
His racism point... - 04/04/2012 02:32:43 PM 917 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying - 03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM 1007 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist? - 03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM 1107 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist? - 04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM 1010 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical. - 04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM 1074 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph - 04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM 1073 Views
Re: Completely agree with your first paragraph - 04/04/2012 01:43:55 PM 1029 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out - 04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM 1060 Views
Fair enough - 04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM 1110 Views
Stop using female as a noun! - 04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM 999 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred - 04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM 1050 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one. - 04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM 998 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though - 04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM 921 Views
Thank you! - 04/04/2012 08:03:38 PM 1037 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds. - 04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM 1022 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over - 04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM 1061 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize. - 04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM 974 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory - 04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM 948 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM 1179 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly... - 04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM 919 Views
That's not what I said. - 04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM 1088 Views
I'm going to have to just outright disagree with you then. *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:54:25 PM 979 Views
If I wanted to be accusatory... - 04/04/2012 11:05:37 PM 990 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears) - 06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM 1016 Views
Nope. (edit) - 06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM 1017 Views
Re: Nope. (edit) - 07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM 1079 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse. - 07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM 949 Views
Ok. - 07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM 1261 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one. - 05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM 1015 Views
I think the language difference is really interesting. - 05/04/2012 03:13:03 PM 1038 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words - 06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM 1103 Views
LOL! You don't say... - 06/04/2012 05:06:20 PM 990 Views
LOL u so mad - 06/04/2012 06:19:28 PM 985 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind. - 04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM 971 Views
My dear - 09/04/2012 01:07:34 PM 1032 Views
LOL - 09/04/2012 01:57:53 PM 853 Views
guess what, it is a noun. *NM* - 04/04/2012 07:26:39 PM 847 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM 994 Views
well it's important that you say "female human" - 04/04/2012 09:28:45 PM 955 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM 952 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing? *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM 967 Views
No, I have issues with words that begin with the letter f. - 04/04/2012 11:09:45 PM 997 Views
ooookay then. - 04/04/2012 11:11:23 PM 1043 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM 1028 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun! - 05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM 898 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here. - 05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM 945 Views
For the record, I certainly don't think you're crazy town. - 05/04/2012 07:23:18 PM 977 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that. - 06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM 991 Views
Fascinating. - 06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM 993 Views
Re: Fascinating. - 07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM 996 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references. - 07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM 983 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is? - 07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM 1044 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong. - 07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM 924 Views
Sorry, no. Read better. - 07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM 954 Views
*deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here. - 07/04/2012 06:38:08 PM 951 Views
Re: *deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here. - 07/04/2012 09:26:34 PM 1089 Views
Aha, we found the problem - 09/04/2012 01:03:35 PM 1060 Views
You're being disingenuous. - 09/04/2012 12:57:38 PM 972 Views
To be fair - 04/04/2012 02:37:25 PM 999 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM 1023 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM 967 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 07:51:46 PM 967 Views
This - 05/04/2012 12:20:04 AM 965 Views
I got half way through the review and got bored. - 04/04/2012 03:09:58 AM 967 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers* - 04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM 1011 Views
I think that might be debatable - 05/04/2012 06:59:35 PM 994 Views
She still made plenty of choices and she did choose to kill. - 05/04/2012 07:13:47 PM 933 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character - 04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM 1049 Views
Out of curiosity (this off topic) - 04/04/2012 07:32:25 PM 944 Views
Rachel, of course. - 05/04/2012 12:17:41 AM 1056 Views
Well. Now I've actually seen it. (mild spoilers) - 09/04/2012 12:17:03 AM 1043 Views