*deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/04/2012 06:38:08 PM
I wrote a long reply with paragraphs that dealt with all of your points, some of them agreeing, others pointing out how you're wrong or at least highly disingenuous, and yes, also one admitting that Vivien's statement about grammar was factually wrong (I admitted my own factual errors already). Might as well delete the lot of it and focus on what matters, though.
There is certainly a difference between those two. But if people walk away from this argument just remembering your statement number 2, with the single addition of the word "many" or "most" between "among" and "American speakers", I think we can all be content. Or as content as we can be without having seen hard data on how widespread exactly the connotation is, anyway.
Nobody ever made your statement number 1. I made part of it and retracted it; Vivien made another part of it and can speak for herself, though I for one don't think she meant it that way. The third part of it is inherently subjective so it's not actually a "claim".
As far as I can tell, everybody involved in this argument learned something out of it, excepting Celia, and your statement 2 comes as close to a consensus as anything I've seen, so seems like a good closing note.
(1) It is ungrammatical to use "female" as a noun and "female" also carries with it universally a connotation of reproductive biology that is reductive, so therefore you should never use female as a noun.
Versus:
(2) Even though you can use "female" as a noun and the connotation today among American speakers is as an effectively harmless synonym for "woman", the word "female" has a history of being used with reference to a female's biology exclusively and for some today this connotation still holds, so therefore it is advisable and preferable to use "woman" over "female" as a noun, just to be on the safe side, so to speak.
There is certainly a difference between those two. But if people walk away from this argument just remembering your statement number 2, with the single addition of the word "many" or "most" between "among" and "American speakers", I think we can all be content. Or as content as we can be without having seen hard data on how widespread exactly the connotation is, anyway.
The citations Vivien supplied absolutely support that second claim. I completely agree with it, and will in the future take care to heed this advice. But the second claim was not the original one that Vivien made, the one that she and you still seem to stand by and the one I've been arguing against The two statements make very, very different factual claims and significantly different normative judgments. There are at least three solid points of disagreement that I took up with Vivien and you and others. I can always enumerate them propositionally if you want. In any case, there you have it.
Nobody ever made your statement number 1. I made part of it and retracted it; Vivien made another part of it and can speak for herself, though I for one don't think she meant it that way. The third part of it is inherently subjective so it's not actually a "claim".
As far as I can tell, everybody involved in this argument learned something out of it, excepting Celia, and your statement 2 comes as close to a consensus as anything I've seen, so seems like a good closing note.
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
- 03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
2402 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
- 03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
1152 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
- 03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
1108 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
- 04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
989 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
- 03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
1067 Views
Where do I start?
- 03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
1073 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
- 04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
1068 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
- 03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
965 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
- 03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
1079 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
- 04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
973 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
- 04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
1040 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
- 04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
1025 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
- 04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
961 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
- 04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
1020 Views
Fair enough
- 04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
1070 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
- 04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
968 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
- 04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
993 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
- 04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
967 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
- 04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
893 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
- 04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
983 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
- 04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
1029 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
- 04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
935 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
- 04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
909 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
- 04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
1143 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
- 04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
875 Views
That's not what I said.
- 04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
1008 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
- 06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
945 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
- 09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
1014 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
- 06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
973 Views
Nope. (edit)
- 06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
983 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
- 07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
1043 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
- 07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
914 Views
Ok.
- 07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
1226 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
- 07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
928 Views
- 07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
928 Views
However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
- 05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
878 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
- 05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
982 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
- 06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
1067 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
- 04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
941 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
- 04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
952 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
- 04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
919 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing?
*NM*
- 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
938 Views
*NM*
- 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
938 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
- 05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
990 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
- 05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
871 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
- 05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
914 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
- 06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
956 Views
Fascinating.
- 06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
972 Views
Re: Fascinating.
- 07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
953 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
- 07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
951 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
- 07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
1013 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
- 07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
890 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
- 07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
922 Views
*deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here.
- 07/04/2012 06:38:08 PM
918 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
- 09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
938 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
- 06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
817 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
- 09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
934 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
- 04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
993 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
- 04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
937 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
- 03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
901 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
- 04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
978 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
- 04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
1010 Views
