*deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/04/2012 06:38:08 PM
I wrote a long reply with paragraphs that dealt with all of your points, some of them agreeing, others pointing out how you're wrong or at least highly disingenuous, and yes, also one admitting that Vivien's statement about grammar was factually wrong (I admitted my own factual errors already). Might as well delete the lot of it and focus on what matters, though.
There is certainly a difference between those two. But if people walk away from this argument just remembering your statement number 2, with the single addition of the word "many" or "most" between "among" and "American speakers", I think we can all be content. Or as content as we can be without having seen hard data on how widespread exactly the connotation is, anyway.
Nobody ever made your statement number 1. I made part of it and retracted it; Vivien made another part of it and can speak for herself, though I for one don't think she meant it that way. The third part of it is inherently subjective so it's not actually a "claim".
As far as I can tell, everybody involved in this argument learned something out of it, excepting Celia, and your statement 2 comes as close to a consensus as anything I've seen, so seems like a good closing note.
(1) It is ungrammatical to use "female" as a noun and "female" also carries with it universally a connotation of reproductive biology that is reductive, so therefore you should never use female as a noun.
Versus:
(2) Even though you can use "female" as a noun and the connotation today among American speakers is as an effectively harmless synonym for "woman", the word "female" has a history of being used with reference to a female's biology exclusively and for some today this connotation still holds, so therefore it is advisable and preferable to use "woman" over "female" as a noun, just to be on the safe side, so to speak.
There is certainly a difference between those two. But if people walk away from this argument just remembering your statement number 2, with the single addition of the word "many" or "most" between "among" and "American speakers", I think we can all be content. Or as content as we can be without having seen hard data on how widespread exactly the connotation is, anyway.
The citations Vivien supplied absolutely support that second claim. I completely agree with it, and will in the future take care to heed this advice. But the second claim was not the original one that Vivien made, the one that she and you still seem to stand by and the one I've been arguing against The two statements make very, very different factual claims and significantly different normative judgments. There are at least three solid points of disagreement that I took up with Vivien and you and others. I can always enumerate them propositionally if you want. In any case, there you have it.
Nobody ever made your statement number 1. I made part of it and retracted it; Vivien made another part of it and can speak for herself, though I for one don't think she meant it that way. The third part of it is inherently subjective so it's not actually a "claim".
As far as I can tell, everybody involved in this argument learned something out of it, excepting Celia, and your statement 2 comes as close to a consensus as anything I've seen, so seems like a good closing note.
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
- 2364 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
- 1128 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
- 1076 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
- 973 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
- 1045 Views
Where do I start?
03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
- 1053 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
- 1051 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
- 949 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
- 1061 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
- 950 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
- 1021 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
- 992 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
- 944 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
- 1002 Views
Fair enough
04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
- 1043 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
- 947 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
- 961 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
- 945 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
- 877 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
- 964 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
- 1010 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
- 916 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
- 890 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
- 1126 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
- 860 Views
That's not what I said.
04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
- 972 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
- 924 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
- 995 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
- 955 Views
Nope. (edit)
06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
- 942 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
- 1011 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
- 893 Views
Ok.
07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
- 1190 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
- 898 Views

However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
- 849 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
- 951 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
- 1030 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
- 915 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
- 918 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
- 899 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing?
*NM*
04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
- 913 Views

Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
- 965 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
- 855 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
- 892 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
- 937 Views
Fascinating.
06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
- 951 Views
Re: Fascinating.
07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
- 935 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
- 930 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
- 992 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
- 869 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
- 902 Views
*deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here.
07/04/2012 06:38:08 PM
- 886 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
- 912 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
- 798 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
- 917 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
- 975 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
- 923 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
- 882 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
- 956 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
- 981 Views