IMO, your arguments aren't convincing. In the end, you theory is largely based on Gawyn's announcement that he will kill Rand, while the other clues pointing to a faked death are just red herrings in your view.
Actually, the theory is largely based on Arthurian and Jesus parallels. It wouldn't be very convincing without that. I don't believe there are any clues that point toward a faked death with the exception of the Logain dream. In that, I believe that the paper puppet symbolizes that Rand's death isn't permanent.
However, also other characters like the Forsaken, Slayer or Fain want to kill Rand.
Slayer only has a passing desire to kill Rand, apparently. He doesn't appear to have any real emotions on the subject. Fain is a Mordred red herring insofar as the Battle of Caemlyn is concerned; I think he will be more important in the events at Shayol Ghul. Everybody wants to kill Rand, but only one of them gets to do it. The fact that no one expects Gawyn is part of what makes this theory convincing.
Nothing indicates why explicitely Gawyn has to be the key player to do it.
A few things do. Mostly Arthurian legend, but also some good foreshadowing in the books.
If Rand really just has to die in some random way for his own good, he could even kill himself just to be ripped out of TAR by Nynaeve later
If he believed that killing himself would do the trick, he could kill himself, but he has no reason to believe that. He just knows he has to die (and he's trying to avoid it).
(of course, this additional theory is pretty loony, too, and doesn't explain why Rand is supposed to be alive & dead at the same time).
Birgitte says that Heroes are not dead as others are dead. It's not just empty words, either - this important fact is the reason why Birgitte was able to interact with living people in Tel'aran'rhiod. Other dead people can't do that. Because Heroes are not dead as others are dead, Birgitte was ripped into the Pattern before her time.
It makes rather sense to me that Gawyn will eventually realize that Rand isn't such a monster and didn't kill his mother.
Of course it does. That's why we all expected it. But the irony will be that she's outside the walls of the city when Gawyn kills Rand. He won't know that she's alive.
Finally, as said, you pretty much ignore the images of an important funeral in many of the Prophecies in question and that – according to these Prophecies - the most important characters in this plotline besides Rand will apparently be Alivia, Rand's three girl and Logain, but not Gawyn.
As I said on Dragonmount (you might not have seen it before the forum went wonky), I'm not ignoring it at all. It just will have a different significance than you seem to think. Alivia is important but only in a random way - Rand seems to think that he can plan something out with her, but he is wrong, just like he was wrong about the touch-merge viewing and the 'into the heart' prophecy (the latter of which is about Tuon and Justice). Logain is importantly only because, once Rand is dead, he'll be free of Rand's restrictions concerning Taim. The three women are important because they have to carry Rand's body to Tar Valon on a boat (probably to prove that he is dead).
My new 'loony' theory
- 03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM
2625 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here...
- 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
1534 Views
- 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
1534 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though.
- 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
1713 Views
- 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
1713 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory....
- 03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM
1401 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan
- 03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM
1632 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory!
- 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
1584 Views
- 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
1584 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong!
- 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
1406 Views
- 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
1406 Views
In my view
- 04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM
1276 Views
Still prejudiced, of course...
- 04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM
1491 Views
Just disagreeing
- 04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM
1388 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence.
- 04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM
1437 Views
Well...
- 04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM
1256 Views
This is getting silly
- 04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM
1222 Views
Yeah, I think as well that we have sufficiently exchanged our views on this matter!
*NM*
- 04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
655 Views
*NM*
- 04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
655 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
- 03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM
1463 Views
cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM
1494 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM
1282 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM
1362 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM
1486 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM
1419 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line?
- 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
1374 Views
- 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
1374 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM
814 Views
now you're a cool kid again?
*NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
763 Views
*NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
763 Views
It was originally a comment on those who normally dwell here (and also did at Wotmania of course) *NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:25:17 AM
747 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
- 04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM
1462 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws?
- 04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM
1410 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand
- 06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM
1168 Views
Indeed he did.
- 06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM
1618 Views
But...
- 06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM
1416 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence!
- 06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM
1250 Views
Well...
- 06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM
1290 Views
*sigh*
- 06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM
1468 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea!
- 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
1423 Views
- 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
1423 Views
You won't.
- 06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM
1337 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic
- 06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM
1460 Views
Nice theory ...
- 07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM
1475 Views
Take two
- 17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM
1265 Views
Re: Take two
- 17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM
1284 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM
1328 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
1472 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM
1372 Views
