Dammit Sidious... this is getting irritating as hell. Silviana clearly states that in the night when Egwene will surely gain her full strength, Barasine alone is enough to shield her, but she wants one more person to prevent trickery from Egwene.
Thus, Barasine alone can shield Egwene, meaning Egwene cannot be more than twice as strong as her.
Thus, Barasine alone can shield Egwene, meaning Egwene cannot be more than twice as strong as her.
We know for a FACT that Amys cannot hold Egwene for more than a few moments in FoH. If Barasine is weaker than Amys, how on earth can Barasine hold Egwene if Egwene is NOT under the influence of forkroot?
Either RJ was wrong, or BS is wrong. So, who do YOU think is wrong?
Barasine could shield Egwene in KoD, so it was RJ all the way.
Now, Amys said she was exhausted by the effort, but she still did hold the shield. So it isn't true at all that Amys cannot shield Egwene.
By my list, both are stronger than half Egwene's strength, and thus both can indeed shield her. Which is verified by the text.
Amys is at that point where she can hold Egwene with great effort, but if Egwene tried, she might be able to break the shield. Egwene did try and couldn't break it, but Amys said she needed to release saidar because Egwene was too strong.
Either way, this debate has gone off on a tangent. Neither Melaine or Amys are weak women, and Egwene is stronger than both combined. Egwene isn't even top strength - all the Forsaken and some good guys exceed her in power. Logically, the average woman cannot cluster around 50% of maximum strength. If so, then Moiraine was really retarded to think that it would take Aviendha and Egwene to 'perhaps' match one of the Forsaken.
Also it takes at least five women to hold a high powered male. Siuan said that Logain would have escaped if it had been less than six women, which is acceptable proof to me that women peak at 10-20. If they're around 50, then Logain is one hell of a guy.
Egwene is roughly as strong as Amys and Melaine combined. Aviendha's quote in FoH cannot be reasonably interpreted in any other way.
If the Bell Curve is a linear reflection of absolute strength, then Lanfear must be twice as strong as the average woman.
That means someone half as strong as Lanfear must be the average woman, and what's more, MOST women must be clustered around that strength range.
Someone barely more than half the strength of Egwene therefore MUST be weaker than the average woman.
That means that Moiraine is weaker than the average woman.
And THAT means that a HUGE number of channelers must be out there, and ON AVERAGE they must be stronger than Moiraine. Probably around Cadsuane's strength.
And since that seems extremely unlikely, the only logical conclusion is that the Bell Curve cannot be a linear representation of absolute strength.
Elayne says that women as strong as Sheriam are uncommon. Therefore most women are weaker than Sheriam. Sheriam is therefore above 50/100 e.g. 60. Amys is in this range, and Aviendha says that Egwene is stronger than Amys + Melaine = > 110 (60 + 50).
I'm wondering where to put everyone else?
Sure, I agree that the average woman is 50. If you're prepared to take Lanfear up to 200.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 10/06/2010 at 09:22:46 PM
Several good MAFOs from Dragonmount
- 10/06/2010 07:07:55 PM
2378 Views
Maria's answer to question 20 is ground-breaking!
- 10/06/2010 07:36:40 PM
1312 Views
No, it merely means that the Bell Curve does not refer to absolute strength...
- 10/06/2010 07:42:31 PM
1154 Views
See the question again man!
- 10/06/2010 07:48:57 PM
1122 Views
That contradicts your assertion that Moiraine is stronger than the average woman...
- 10/06/2010 07:50:11 PM
1210 Views
I need to re-evaluate nothing!
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1141 Views
- 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
1141 Views
Think logically for a moment...
- 10/06/2010 07:49:10 PM
975 Views
Who said Egwene is twice as strong as Moiraine?
- 10/06/2010 07:52:27 PM
1267 Views
Aviendha did in FoH...
- 10/06/2010 07:54:32 PM
970 Views
Nope!
- 10/06/2010 07:55:55 PM
1147 Views
Your quotes are faulty
- 10/06/2010 07:57:18 PM
1132 Views
In what sense though?
- 10/06/2010 07:59:00 PM
1130 Views
Forkroot
- 10/06/2010 08:04:50 PM
1085 Views
Again... later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:05:39 PM
952 Views
What do you mean?
- 10/06/2010 08:07:24 PM
1118 Views
See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:11:24 PM
1002 Views
Re: See below...
- 10/06/2010 08:12:34 PM
1064 Views
I just did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:09 PM
917 Views
Well then we disagree
- 10/06/2010 08:18:10 PM
1119 Views
BUT WHAT ABOUT LATER IN THE NIGHT!
- 10/06/2010 08:20:21 PM
939 Views
Ah, you mean later later ...
- 10/06/2010 08:29:59 PM
1043 Views
Forkroot wears off, you know?
- 10/06/2010 08:45:33 PM
1144 Views
Yes I know
- 10/06/2010 09:05:29 PM
1147 Views
I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:17:10 PM
1112 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:37:39 PM
1111 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 09:51:40 PM
1048 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
- 10/06/2010 10:05:37 PM
1094 Views
Are you sure you're feeling fine?
- 10/06/2010 10:18:44 PM
1149 Views
RJ writes that Amys cannot hold Egwene. BS writes that Barasene can. Who are you gonna believe?
- 10/06/2010 08:31:35 PM
959 Views
It wasn't BS... both were RJ!
- 10/06/2010 08:41:54 PM
1047 Views
In that case, there is no problem...
- 10/06/2010 08:45:05 PM
1185 Views
But that isn't what the text says...
- 10/06/2010 08:57:42 PM
911 Views
How can Egwene be strong enough to overcome Katerine and Silviana together then?
- 10/06/2010 09:07:36 PM
1153 Views
Yeah, both were RJ
- 10/06/2010 08:49:13 PM
1026 Views
Yeah yeah... RJ lied, Maria lied. Only you make sense. I'm finished with this debate.
- 10/06/2010 08:59:06 PM
1113 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1119 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
1119 Views
Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:29:22 PM
975 Views
Re: Really?
- 10/06/2010 09:39:21 PM
1098 Views
Here's what is clear:
- 10/06/2010 09:02:41 PM
1016 Views
IMO it's easy to disprove
- 10/06/2010 09:22:23 PM
998 Views
Dude...
- 10/06/2010 09:27:34 PM
912 Views
At least we agree on one thing
- 10/06/2010 09:29:14 PM
1026 Views
yet 4 women can still hold Rand in LoC ... he can't break the Shield until it's down to 3
- 13/06/2010 12:47:43 PM
849 Views
Have to agree with Sidious on this point
- 11/06/2010 02:49:58 AM
952 Views
The rate forkroot wears off?
- 16/06/2010 12:36:38 PM
1064 Views
You missed that she isn't being given Forkroot at night at all!
- 16/06/2010 04:47:59 PM
967 Views
Maria's other answer adresses this...
- 10/06/2010 08:14:54 PM
867 Views
Then one Aes Sedai cannot shield her. But one did.
- 10/06/2010 08:16:41 PM
984 Views
You can be much weaker than someone, and hold them shielded, if they are already cut off...
- 10/06/2010 08:19:15 PM
969 Views
But, if you are much stronger, you can break that shield...
- 10/06/2010 08:22:25 PM
965 Views
Easy...
- 10/06/2010 08:24:59 PM
932 Views
What has that got to do with it?
- 10/06/2010 08:32:56 PM
1119 Views
Amys is not LESS than half of Egwene's strength. You cannot hold someone if you are LESS than half..
- 10/06/2010 08:47:41 PM
1035 Views
Amys is as strong as Moiraine, at the most one level lower. Barasine is weaker than Katarine, who...
- 10/06/2010 09:00:26 PM
1156 Views
I can agree with that.
- 10/06/2010 09:09:07 PM
926 Views
...
- 10/06/2010 09:12:21 PM
923 Views
Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:13:59 PM
1072 Views
Re: Agreed, but...
- 10/06/2010 09:16:30 PM
872 Views
Good point...
- 10/06/2010 09:18:53 PM
1093 Views
Or, you know, you can have the grace to question your antiquated strength list...
- 10/06/2010 09:22:51 PM
945 Views
I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense
- 10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM
892 Views
Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:41:59 PM
898 Views
Re: Uhhh?
- 10/06/2010 09:48:58 PM
904 Views
DUDE!
- 10/06/2010 09:58:59 PM
922 Views
Rand seems to shield Egwene and Elayne TOGETHER, pretty easily...
- 10/06/2010 09:54:03 PM
1574 Views
That's fairly simple, actually...
- 10/06/2010 10:08:53 PM
1143 Views
Nope. Rand was also cut off from the Source when he broke a shield held by 3 Aes Sedai...
- 10/06/2010 11:18:41 PM
1107 Views
Because that channeler is much stronger? I'm not getting your confusion here. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 11:27:31 PM
531 Views
Your Aes Sedai are close to the average woman in strength, right...
- 10/06/2010 11:42:01 PM
1182 Views
No, here's the quote: I hate having to pull out my books with their yellowed pages...
- 10/06/2010 08:01:54 PM
939 Views
Why would she need surprise against two? That was against five of them...
- 10/06/2010 08:04:57 PM
955 Views
Very poor evidence
- 10/06/2010 08:11:26 PM
1083 Views
no she said Egwene is stronger than Amys and Melaine combined
- 11/06/2010 12:46:29 AM
1020 Views
The actual quote says Amys and Melaine combined...
- 11/06/2010 12:25:07 PM
1065 Views
Here's the problem with that...
- 11/06/2010 12:42:41 PM
927 Views
I think you are misreading her.
- 10/06/2010 07:47:06 PM
904 Views
Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. *NM*
- 10/06/2010 09:23:36 PM
569 Views
Re: Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution.
- 10/06/2010 10:11:23 PM
1120 Views
Yes. You can't extrapolate a generalized macro level scale to micro level individuals.
- 11/06/2010 12:16:24 AM
968 Views
I don't agree
- 10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM
953 Views
BAH! Its infuriating how you have so many blinders... Eerily Aes Sedai of you.
- 10/06/2010 07:54:23 PM
1147 Views
Hmm...
- 10/06/2010 07:55:59 PM
876 Views
Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 07:57:55 PM
889 Views
Re: Because of the question to which she responded...
- 10/06/2010 08:06:16 PM
1041 Views
Without contradicting the latter...
- 10/06/2010 08:15:11 PM
928 Views
Ah well
- 10/06/2010 08:20:32 PM
927 Views
Great! Two of my OP strength ideas have been solidified!
- 10/06/2010 07:39:53 PM
1153 Views
Nope...
- 10/06/2010 07:46:31 PM
1010 Views
Who said Cadsuane was 50?
- 10/06/2010 07:51:14 PM
1038 Views
So how can Egwene be twice as strong as Moiraine, if Moiraine is at 55?
- 10/06/2010 07:53:11 PM
901 Views
She cannot be because she isn't. Silviana can shield Egwene alone, for God's sake. So can Amys!
- 10/06/2010 07:56:26 PM
853 Views
Amys can't hold her properly
- 10/06/2010 07:59:47 PM
887 Views
What about later that night?
- 10/06/2010 08:02:16 PM
901 Views
No she didn't
- 16/06/2010 03:02:21 PM
1019 Views
No she didn't what?
- 16/06/2010 04:46:05 PM
1065 Views
Re: No she didn't what?
- 17/06/2010 06:16:16 AM
917 Views
Why do you think it's a linear scale?
- 16/06/2010 05:25:56 AM
1016 Views
That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 06:36:44 AM
989 Views
Re: That's simple...
- 16/06/2010 12:27:07 PM
938 Views
Your concept is not mathematically right. So yeah, forget discussing it.
- 16/06/2010 04:41:13 PM
1125 Views
Dang, Cyndane isn't using Cabriana's body.
- 10/06/2010 08:25:20 PM
971 Views
The blue flash RAFO irritates me- I can't see how that will be relevant. The Min thing was new
- 10/06/2010 08:50:52 PM
1088 Views
RJ already RAFOed the incident with Thom's knives/daggers before
- 10/06/2010 08:57:52 PM
1170 Views
It isn't, unless she's implying the Creator helped him out or some other such thing
- 11/06/2010 12:56:49 AM
918 Views
Just to make things clear on the strength thing...
- 10/06/2010 09:08:02 PM
1200 Views
It is possible Maria was answering the first question and ignoring the second...
- 10/06/2010 09:29:59 PM
936 Views
That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
1103 Views
Re: That still proves my point...
- 10/06/2010 09:45:39 PM
970 Views
Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:00:00 PM
1060 Views
Re: Then why...
- 10/06/2010 10:07:56 PM
934 Views
God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:10:32 PM
914 Views
Re: God, what stupidity!
- 10/06/2010 10:16:38 PM
1021 Views
It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:32:17 PM
960 Views
Re: It doesn't have to be 1-100.
- 10/06/2010 10:41:02 PM
1251 Views
That's a mathematical impossibility...
- 10/06/2010 11:26:23 PM
1093 Views
Just popping in. I think you're arguing over non-existent delineations.
- 11/06/2010 12:44:40 AM
1010 Views
You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:25:05 AM
989 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 03:22:53 AM
1102 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
- 11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM
1060 Views
I agree
- 11/06/2010 01:14:36 PM
1160 Views
Re: I agree
- 12/06/2010 03:02:32 PM
942 Views
BS didn't answer with "Read and find out"
- 12/06/2010 03:28:05 PM
974 Views
We were speaking about Maria giving a RAFO on the topic, not Sanderson. *NM*
- 13/06/2010 12:05:17 AM
548 Views
Actually she said "No"...
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
645 Views
*NM*
- 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
645 Views
I'll rephrase then. It was about Maria saying that she considered giving a RAFO on the question.
- 13/06/2010 01:44:19 AM
972 Views
Eh, practically useless.
- 14/06/2010 11:50:06 PM
927 Views
I agree. I think she is saving the good stuff for the encyclopedia. *NM*
- 15/06/2010 04:17:07 PM
512 Views
Yeah. I do think she's taking advantage of these poor saps, though.
- 17/06/2010 03:52:33 PM
1499 Views
