Active Users:162 Time:13/06/2024 09:44:13 PM
This... Etzel Send a noteboard - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM
***Brandon*** Re: Will we see Rand in the next book? YES. The book will not be a 100% flash-back like Bk 10. There will be a little bit of catch-up for Perrin, but Egwene and Rand both have large parts too.

***Brandon*** Thing is, Elayne was way ahead of everyone else in her plotline. (Meaning what she needed to get done.) And so, with great regret, I moved her to TofM.

***Brandon*** Re: Is Rand up to date with Elayne. To be honest, Luckers, I'd have to go look at my timeline. I'm pretty sure Rand was at June (our world months) at the end of TGS. Perrin ended at beginning of April. Elayne...grrr Can't remember. But Rand/Egwene are in sync with one another as of the end of that book. I think Elayne is just a tad behind.


Makes it yet less likely that there will be an on-screen Graendal flashback, possibly meeting Aran'gar, from before Graendal's death (as some believe might happen, because it would be "cool", and otherwise Graendal couldn't reveal in her PoV that she killed Asmo, since RJ wanted to reveal it in the killer's PoV...).

Graendal was a part of Rand's plot- and timeline, which is basically up to date; the same applies to Aran'gar in Egwene's plotline, which was also sufficiently advanced in TGS. No reason to suddenly jump back in the respective timelines regarding these two Forsaken (though Aran'gar might think in her next PoV about a last meeting with Graendal).
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 1912 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1042 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 917 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 844 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 864 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 809 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 721 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 835 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 808 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 717 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 681 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 654 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 858 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 624 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 784 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 703 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 721 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 658 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 632 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 682 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 849 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 612 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 751 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 941 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 643 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 862 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 783 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 850 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 737 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 834 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 659 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 875 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 734 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 682 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 816 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 750 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 817 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 328 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 549 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 666 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 722 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 675 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 613 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 738 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 753 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 802 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 884 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 861 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 746 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 742 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 652 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 738 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 632 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 667 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 736 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 693 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 788 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 792 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 784 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 616 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 637 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 778 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 741 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 878 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 682 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 358 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 814 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 679 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 722 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 814 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 606 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 684 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 917 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 625 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 741 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 780 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 699 Views

Reply to Message