Active Users:672 Time:18/12/2025 11:52:40 PM
how do you get there from this? darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM
***Brandon*** Re: Will we see Rand in the next book? YES. The book will not be a 100% flash-back like Bk 10. There will be a little bit of catch-up for Perrin, but Egwene and Rand both have large parts too.

***Brandon*** Thing is, Elayne was way ahead of everyone else in her plotline. (Meaning what she needed to get done.) And so, with great regret, I moved her to TofM.

***Brandon*** Re: Is Rand up to date with Elayne. To be honest, Luckers, I'd have to go look at my timeline. I'm pretty sure Rand was at June (our world months) at the end of TGS. Perrin ended at beginning of April. Elayne...grrr Can't remember. But Rand/Egwene are in sync with one another as of the end of that book. I think Elayne is just a tad behind.


Makes it yet less likely that there will be an on-screen Graendal flashback, possibly meeting Aran'gar, from before Graendal's death (as some believe might happen, because it would be "cool", and otherwise Graendal couldn't reveal in her PoV that she killed Asmo, since RJ wanted to reveal it in the killer's PoV...).

Graendal was a part of Rand's plot- and timeline, which is basically up to date; the same applies to Aran'gar in Egwene's plotline, which was also sufficiently advanced in TGS. No reason to suddenly jump back in the respective timelines regarding these two Forsaken (though Aran'gar might think in her next PoV about a last meeting with Graendal).


he says Rand won't have flashback time. Nothing to indicate that Graendal won't be shown this way.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2134 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1267 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1114 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 1047 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1096 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 1025 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 940 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 1051 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 1025 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 924 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 890 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 852 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 1052 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 816 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 981 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 925 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 964 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 871 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 878 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 931 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 1088 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 836 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 955 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1152 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 865 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 1060 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 990 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 1059 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 945 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 1045 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 879 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1085 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 950 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 926 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 1037 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 952 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 1028 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 427 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 767 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 899 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 924 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 886 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 852 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 970 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 972 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 1029 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1110 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 1091 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 947 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 955 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 857 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 931 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 829 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 887 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 947 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 901 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 1003 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 991 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 1061 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 818 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 839 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 970 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 932 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1122 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 892 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 457 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 1012 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 875 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 891 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 1019 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 818 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 889 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1131 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 845 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 969 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 980 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 905 Views

Reply to Message