***Brandon*** Re: Will we see Rand in the next book? YES. The book will not be a 100% flash-back like Bk 10. There will be a little bit of catch-up for Perrin, but Egwene and Rand both have large parts too.
***Brandon*** Thing is, Elayne was way ahead of everyone else in her plotline. (Meaning what she needed to get done.) And so, with great regret, I moved her to TofM.
***Brandon*** Re: Is Rand up to date with Elayne. To be honest, Luckers, I'd have to go look at my timeline. I'm pretty sure Rand was at June (our world months) at the end of TGS. Perrin ended at beginning of April. Elayne...grrr Can't remember. But Rand/Egwene are in sync with one another as of the end of that book. I think Elayne is just a tad behind.
***Brandon*** Thing is, Elayne was way ahead of everyone else in her plotline. (Meaning what she needed to get done.) And so, with great regret, I moved her to TofM.
***Brandon*** Re: Is Rand up to date with Elayne. To be honest, Luckers, I'd have to go look at my timeline. I'm pretty sure Rand was at June (our world months) at the end of TGS. Perrin ended at beginning of April. Elayne...grrr Can't remember. But Rand/Egwene are in sync with one another as of the end of that book. I think Elayne is just a tad behind.
Makes it yet less likely that there will be an on-screen Graendal flashback, possibly meeting Aran'gar, from before Graendal's death (as some believe might happen, because it would be "cool", and otherwise Graendal couldn't reveal in her PoV that she killed Asmo, since RJ wanted to reveal it in the killer's PoV...).
Graendal was a part of Rand's plot- and timeline, which is basically up to date; the same applies to Aran'gar in Egwene's plotline, which was also sufficiently advanced in TGS. No reason to suddenly jump back in the respective timelines regarding these two Forsaken (though Aran'gar might think in her next PoV about a last meeting with Graendal).
he says Rand won't have flashback time. Nothing to indicate that Graendal won't be shown this way.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount
- 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM
2202 Views
This...
- 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM
1328 Views
how do you get there from this?
- 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM
1174 Views
Because...
- 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM
1151 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM
1074 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM
1050 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved
- 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM
1079 Views
No...
- 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM
988 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok
- 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM
947 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM*
- 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM
915 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1118 Views
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1118 Views
Again...
- 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM
874 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal
- 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM
1030 Views
The point is...
- 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM
983 Views
that is 100% your interpretation
- 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM
1033 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation.
- 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM
945 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line
- 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM
942 Views
As far as we know...
- 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM
1026 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved
- 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM
1149 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines...
- 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM
895 Views
Indeed
- 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM
919 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM
1120 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong
- 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM
1006 Views
I agree regarding Graendal, but have to disagree concerning Lanfear.
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1200 Views
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1200 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM
1052 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM
1118 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters
- 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM
998 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!!
- 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM
1107 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos!
- 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM
941 Views
where do you get this stuff from?
- 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM
1138 Views
Eh, no
- 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM
1016 Views
I disagree
- 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM
996 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar
- 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM
1101 Views
pure interpretation
- 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM
1001 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM*
- 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM
1087 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM*
- 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM
451 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM
959 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM
986 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM
944 Views
And...
- 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM
1023 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she
- 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM
1027 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR...
- 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM
1081 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said).
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
994 Views
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
994 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen
- 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM
1031 Views
Ok...
- 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM
910 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM
941 Views
But we never...
- 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM
1006 Views
Re: But we never...
- 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM
954 Views
I think
- 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM
1051 Views
Re: I think
- 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM
1051 Views
Yeah, RAFO! I predigt however, that we won't have another Graendal PoV. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:59:26 PM
966 Views
Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true.
- 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM
1118 Views
I admit the possibility, but consider it highly unlikely for the reasons I pointed out. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:58:01 PM
1065 Views
Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM
1130 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM
872 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM
896 Views
Rand used so much baelfire on her that he zapped them all back to the last 3rd Age
- 15/07/2010 01:38:48 PM
1106 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM*
- 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM
1027 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base
- 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM
1183 Views
On a somewhat related note, Sanderson says ToM consists of 80 chapters as of now. Ginormous!
- 13/07/2010 01:54:15 AM
935 Views
On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM
1180 Views
Re: On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM
907 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A!
- 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM
957 Views

