Active Users:520 Time:30/04/2025 09:47:00 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. Etzel Send a noteboard - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM
Such a scene would precisely be a flashback in Rand's plot-/ timeline, especially if we would get the PoV from Graendal just before Rand's balefire hit her palace. It's clear from his answers, that BS won't jump back in Rand's plotline.


That doesn't mean there won't be any. A large portion of the first half of the book could be that way.


Like Rand's, to which Graendal was tied to.
This message last edited by Etzel on 13/07/2010 at 08:42:34 AM
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount Skeeve the Great - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2040 Views
This... Etzel - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1184 Views
how do you get there from this? darius_sedai - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1035 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: beetnemesis - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 967 Views
Because... Etzel - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 992 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan newyorkersedai - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 939 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 Rurouni_Kenshin - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 841 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. Etzel - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 965 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 947 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer dacole - 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM 893 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM 915 Views
No... Etzel - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 837 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 810 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* Etzel - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 776 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 978 Views
Again... Etzel - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 738 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 903 Views
The point is... Etzel - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 825 Views
that is 100% your interpretation darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 859 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 767 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 767 Views
As far as we know... Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 821 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 979 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... Etzel - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 743 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 875 Views
We will see... *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1066 Views
Indeed Sidious - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 793 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... Etzel - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 978 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong dacole - 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM 860 Views
I agree regarding Graendal, but have to disagree concerning Lanfear. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM 1039 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... Sidious - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 905 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary Etzel - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 974 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 861 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! Sidious - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 964 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 788 Views
where do you get this stuff from? darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 998 Views
Eh, no Etzel - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 854 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 817 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 939 Views
pure interpretation darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 875 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 940 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 379 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her Etzel - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 673 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing Sidious - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 799 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing Etzel - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 845 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing Sidious - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 801 Views
IMO... Etzel - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 745 Views
And... Etzel - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 866 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 890 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... Etzel - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 936 Views
not really darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1010 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 985 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 863 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 867 Views
Ok... Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 783 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 858 Views
I also just said that... Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 750 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary Datakim - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 801 Views
But we never... Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 852 Views
Re: But we never... Datakim - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 820 Views
I think Etzel - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 920 Views
Re: I think Datakim - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 916 Views
Yeah, RAFO! I predigt however, that we won't have another Graendal PoV. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:59:26 PM 836 Views
Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true. Logain - 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM 948 Views
I admit the possibility, but consider it highly unlikely for the reasons I pointed out. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:58:01 PM 910 Views
Because some people can't read... DomA - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 939 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 735 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... Sidious - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 749 Views
Rand used so much baelfire on her that he zapped them all back to the last 3rd Age darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:38:48 PM 967 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* RandAllThor - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 891 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 858 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base Logain - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1009 Views
hrmm, not necessarily Kieran - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 809 Views
I agree. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 414 Views
Uh... TaskmasterJack - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 932 Views
or "can't" because ... Shishka - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 797 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... TaskmasterJack - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 817 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 933 Views
On a somewhat related note, Sanderson says ToM consists of 80 chapters as of now. Ginormous! RandAllThor - 13/07/2010 01:54:15 AM 795 Views
Perrin catch-up? Comet Sedai - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 726 Views
We will get it on screen Deadsy - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 813 Views
On Mat's "death" Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1040 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" Datakim - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 751 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation Etzel - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 867 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation Datakim - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 899 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! Mats imaginary friend - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 814 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes