Active Users:343 Time:17/06/2025 12:32:37 PM
No... Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM
I argue that this Graendal flashback theory is ridiculous if she died in TGS, because something like this never happened in the series (namely that a dead character got a flashback in the next book; other characters just think about the dead character). No one argued this after Sammael's or Osan'gar's death, because it's obviously absurd. Graendal would have gotten another PoV in TGS if it were needed. Apparently a few people just think it will be differently in Graendal's case, because RJ said that Asmo's killer will most likely reveal it in his or her PoV.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2052 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1199 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1048 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 981 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1004 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 951 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 855 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 974 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 958 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 851 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 822 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 790 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 993 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 750 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 915 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 843 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 874 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 780 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 781 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 833 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 991 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 758 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 887 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1079 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 807 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 992 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 922 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 986 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 873 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 975 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 801 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1012 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 867 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 833 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 955 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 886 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 952 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 386 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 688 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 812 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 857 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 813 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 771 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 880 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 904 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 946 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1025 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 997 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 875 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 885 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 797 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 868 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 763 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 815 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 867 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 830 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 935 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 927 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 959 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 750 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 762 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 905 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 872 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1025 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 820 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 422 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 942 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 811 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 831 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 947 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 738 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 825 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1057 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 764 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 881 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 911 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 830 Views

Reply to Message