Active Users:651 Time:18/12/2025 11:55:30 PM
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
I argue that this Graendal flashback theory is ridiculous if she died in TGS, because something like this never happened in the series (namely that a dead character got a flashback in the next book; other characters just think about the dead character). No one argued this after Sammael's or Osan'gar's death, because it's obviously absurd. Graendal would have gotten another PoV in TGS if it were needed. Apparently a few people just think it will be differently in Graendal's case, because RJ said that Asmo's killer will most likely reveal it in his or her PoV.


Believe as you like, I'm not going to make this a debate about who killed Asmodean. Regardless of that issue, there is nothing in BSand's quote saying there will be NO flashbacks, only that Rand is up to date as is Egwene. Graendal was involved with several plot lines and any of those could easily be behind Rand/Egwene in ToM. Aran'gar has not been heard from at the very least.


Not to mention letting us know what Aran'gar is up too or give us further insight into other FS ... she's been the best character for that by far.

No reason for BSand to play the "I'm not going to tell you she's dead card" if he isn't going to reveal it in the text. If she's dead and not coming back in anyway what sensible reason would he have to be coy about her?
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2134 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1269 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1115 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 1047 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1096 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 1026 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 940 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 1051 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 1025 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 924 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 890 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 853 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 1053 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 816 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 981 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 926 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 965 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 871 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 879 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 931 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 1088 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 837 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 956 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1152 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 865 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 1060 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 990 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 1059 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 945 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 1045 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 879 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1085 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 950 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 926 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 1038 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 952 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 1028 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 427 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 767 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 900 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 925 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 887 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 852 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 971 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 973 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 1029 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1111 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 1091 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 948 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 955 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 857 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 931 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 829 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 887 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 948 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 901 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 1004 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 991 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 1061 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 818 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 839 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 970 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 933 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1122 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 892 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 457 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 1013 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 875 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 891 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 1019 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 818 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 889 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1131 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 845 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 969 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 980 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 906 Views

Reply to Message