Active Users:351 Time:17/06/2025 11:22:04 AM
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM
If there is such a urgent need to reveal further informations on Graendal's plans and deeds, it makes more sense that it will be revealed in the PoV of another Forsaken or SH without jumping back in Graendal's timeline, which ended in TGS, and not bring back a dead character.

Personally, I think it's absolutely clear that Graendal died of course. BS simply doesn't admit it yet, to keep some people a bit guessing.


There is absolutely no reason to believe that just because Graendal likely died in Rands timeline that she won't appear in Perrin or Mat's timeline prior to her death.


There is absolutely no reason to believe that Graendal WILL appear, because as far as we know she was concentrated on Arad Doman and Rand to fulfill Moridin's orders. There is also absolutely no indication in Perrin's or Mat's timeline, which were advanced in TGS, that Graendal played any part there.

As often said, it never happened before that a character, who died in a specific timeline, suddenly appears again in the next book in another timeline before the death. It would likely confuse many readers and is not necessary (BS also told once on his homepage that he doesn't like such flashbacks). You can naturally better advance the plot/timeline and avoid any confusion, if you simply include e.g. an Aran'gar PoV, where she muses about Graendal, her death and how Aran'gar will go one now.

For these reasons it's highly unlikely that Graendal will have another PoV yet, if she died in TGS, like also Sammael, Osan'gar or any other character never got another PoV after their death to give certain informations.


What about Noal Charin? he was almost certainly involved with Graendal at some point.

Face it you are making excuses for there to be no Graendal involvement solely because you are worried that if she crops up she'll finally admit to having killed Asmo.


And even if Noal was linked to Graendal in the past, nothing indicates that she has to appear in ToM to talk with Noal.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2051 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1198 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1047 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 980 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1003 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 951 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 855 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 974 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 958 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 850 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 822 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 789 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 992 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 749 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 915 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 843 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 874 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 780 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 780 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 833 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 990 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 758 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 886 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1079 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 806 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 991 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 921 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 986 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 873 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 975 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 800 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1011 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 867 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 832 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 955 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 886 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 952 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 386 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 688 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 812 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 856 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 813 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 770 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 880 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 903 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 946 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1025 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 997 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 875 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 884 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 796 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 868 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 763 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 814 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 867 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 830 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 934 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 927 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 959 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 750 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 761 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 904 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 872 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1025 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 819 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 422 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 942 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 810 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 830 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 946 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 738 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 825 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1056 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 764 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 881 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 911 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 830 Views

Reply to Message