Active Users:569 Time:30/04/2025 09:42:27 AM
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... Etzel Send a noteboard - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM
Especially if they don't completely trust each other, as one can suspect with Graendal and Aran'gar, who never worked together before. Graendal and Sammael were already quite close in the AoL, thus it's not surprising that Graendal would tell him about her lair (contrary to Aran'gar).

I definitely think, though, that it's likely that Graendal and Aran'gar met once or twice in TAR between the prologue of TGS and Graendal's death. However, nothing suggests that Graendal would tell Aran'gar about her lair or that they were closely working together on some project, but just exchanging infos. That Aran'gar lost her power base could make her even less valuable in Graendal's eyes. Probably both were anyway rather busy on their very own plots in the last weeks till Graendal's death so that they didn't see each other that often.

Actually I didn't start the discussion, if Graendal will have a PoV in ToM. Other people suddenly suggested that it's very likely that we will see Graendal again and that she will have a PoV in ToM, although she died, or even claimed that BS stated that we'll see Graendal again, because they obviously misinterpreted BS's comments about the timelines & that Graendal's name will be mentioned in ToM a few times. I just pointed out the reasons then, why it is highly unlikely that Graendal will be seen again, let alone have a PoV in ToM, if she died in TGS. Apparently you agree with this.

As said, I think most likely Aran'gar will muse about Graendal, their last meeting & her death, at whatever location Aran'gar is staying now or during a Forsaken meeting.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2040 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1184 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1035 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 967 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 992 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 939 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 840 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 964 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 946 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 837 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 810 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 775 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 977 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 738 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 903 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 824 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 859 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 767 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 767 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 821 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 978 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 742 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 874 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1065 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 792 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 977 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 905 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 973 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 860 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 964 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 787 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 997 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 853 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 816 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 939 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 875 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 939 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 379 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 672 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 799 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 844 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 800 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 745 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 866 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 890 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 936 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1010 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 985 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 863 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 866 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 783 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 858 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 749 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 800 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 852 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 819 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 920 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 915 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 938 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 734 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 748 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 891 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 858 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1009 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 809 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 414 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 931 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 796 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 816 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 933 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 726 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 813 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1040 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 751 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 866 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 898 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 813 Views

Reply to Message