Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true.
Logain Send a noteboard - 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM
In fact, BS's answer that there are flashbacks makes is highly likely that we will get a Graendal PoV.
For example, Perrin, but also Lan or Loial.
It's complete nonsense to bring back a character that died in Rand's timeline - which is up to date - with a scene before the death; something like this also never happened before in the series. One could also argue in a similarly absurd way then that we will "likely" get another Semirhage or Elza PoV from before their deaths, just because it would be cool.
We all agree that Perrin and Mat's timelines have to be advanced and that they are weeks (maybe months) behind everyone else. Other minor characters are also behind, e.g. Lan, and some of those minor characters might get a chapter devoted to them, particularly Lan.
Anyway, why are you assuming Graendal couldn't have been playing a role in the Mat or Perrin parts of the world?
Wouldn't you agree that if Graendal has a part to play with what is happening to Mat or Perrin then she could appear in the next book? I think you have to agree of that possibility.
You're making a completely different argument in your other posts. You're saying that it would be awkward, from a literary perspective, to have a dead character make a reappearance in a later book. I agree, but that doesn't preclude the possibility of seeing Graendal in this next book.
Also, remember that originally there was only going to be one final book. The decision to split the final 900K words into three books might have made the difference here. For example, suppose that RJ always intended to reveal Asmo's killer via a Graendal POV in one of the Perrin or Mat threads. It is not too hard to imagine how the Asmo reveal might have been pushed back to ToM simply because there wasn't room in TGS due to the way the storylines were chopped up.
In any event, even if Graendal is dead (and I think she is) you cannot completely rule out seeing her in ToM because ToM goes backward in time by several weeks/months.
You should at least admit the possibility.
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount
- 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM
2128 Views
This...
- 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM
1266 Views
how do you get there from this?
- 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM
1112 Views
Because...
- 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM
1091 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM
1025 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM
987 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved
- 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM
1008 Views
No...
- 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM
921 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok
- 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM
887 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM*
- 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM
851 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1051 Views
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1051 Views
Again...
- 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM
813 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal
- 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM
979 Views
The point is...
- 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM
924 Views
that is 100% your interpretation
- 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM
962 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation.
- 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM
869 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line
- 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM
877 Views
As far as we know...
- 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM
928 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved
- 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM
1087 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines...
- 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM
835 Views
Indeed
- 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM
863 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM
1059 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong
- 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM
949 Views
I agree regarding Graendal, but have to disagree concerning Lanfear.
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1134 Views
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1134 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM
985 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM
1057 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters
- 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM
944 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!!
- 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM
1045 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos!
- 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM
877 Views
where do you get this stuff from?
- 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM
1084 Views
Eh, no
- 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM
949 Views
I disagree
- 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM
923 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar
- 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM
1035 Views
pure interpretation
- 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM
951 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM*
- 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM
1027 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM*
- 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM
426 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM
897 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM
921 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM
885 Views
And...
- 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM
968 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she
- 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM
971 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR...
- 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM
1029 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said).
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
942 Views
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
942 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen
- 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM
953 Views
Ok...
- 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM
855 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM
884 Views
But we never...
- 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM
945 Views
Re: But we never...
- 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM
901 Views
I think
- 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM
1002 Views
Re: I think
- 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM
991 Views
Yeah, RAFO! I predigt however, that we won't have another Graendal PoV. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:59:26 PM
910 Views
Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true.
- 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM
1056 Views
I admit the possibility, but consider it highly unlikely for the reasons I pointed out. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:58:01 PM
1005 Views
Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM
1058 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM
817 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM
837 Views
Rand used so much baelfire on her that he zapped them all back to the last 3rd Age
- 15/07/2010 01:38:48 PM
1043 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM*
- 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM
969 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base
- 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM
1116 Views
On a somewhat related note, Sanderson says ToM consists of 80 chapters as of now. Ginormous!
- 13/07/2010 01:54:15 AM
874 Views
On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM
1131 Views
Re: On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM
844 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A!
- 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM
900 Views

