Active Users:385 Time:01/05/2025 07:58:49 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yes. RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM
What's the harm? Jason has already put a spoiler-free review out there that some treat with skepticism, so why not allow other voices to chime in with their thoughts as well? If visitors choose not to read them, that's their prerogative, but I don't think everyone should be denied the chance to read them on that account; I have no interest in certain sections of this site, but I would hardly say they should be shut down solely because I'm not interested in using them. Speaking for myself, I am expecting an advance copy and don't have a blog of my own to review it on. If I can't post my review here (my first choice), I'll post it to another WoT site, so any ban on spoiler-free reviews here wouldn't prevent me from getting my review out there. I think a reasonable compromise might be to allow spoiler-free reviews but only to the extent that the reviewer sends the admins some kind of proof that they have the book (a scanned copy of the first page of Chapter 2 would due, for example). That way, the admins wouldn't have to worry about the authenticity issue, and anyone interested in pre-release reviews could read them here.

Just my two cents!
This message last edited by RandAllThor on 20/09/2009 at 12:25:42 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1681 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 463 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1024 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 454 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 955 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 459 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 806 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 457 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 507 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 555 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 528 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 506 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 517 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 459 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 507 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 930 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 476 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 820 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 452 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 465 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 933 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 472 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 836 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1124 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 439 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 445 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 458 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 452 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 495 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 833 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 501 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 772 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 457 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 458 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 454 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 453 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 426 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 867 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 826 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 815 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 882 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 881 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 482 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 895 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1358 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 862 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1009 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 949 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 857 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 834 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 996 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1232 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 832 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1013 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 755 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 831 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 726 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 948 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1066 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 860 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 953 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 750 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 833 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 428 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 798 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 759 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 928 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1018 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 817 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1072 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 879 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 826 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 474 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 434 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 440 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes