Active Users:416 Time:17/09/2025 11:00:52 PM
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
Are you willing to be the one who makes sure the poster actually has a pre-release copy? Or are you just willing to make more work for someone else? If you are actually willing to do the actual work, how pray tell will you do that? What kind of proof can the reviewers provide? Scanned copyright page? anybody can fake those. ISBN #? already published. Get real man.


I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.

Umm...You ever heard of Napster? All it would take would be one quote from the book and TOR would be completely within it's rights to shut RAFO down. Are YOU personally willing to be legally responsible for something that someone posts here? Sorry but I'm not. And sure, anybody at any time can post anything here. But by providing a spot for pirates to post what they want, the situation changes to "abetting and encouraging".


I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?

If the admins have a serious concern about legal liability, I say don't allow the reviews. If the only serious concern is one of authenticity/credibility, though, I don't see the problem. RAFO isn't vauching for the reviews in any way, and no WoT sites that I know of have been made laughing stocks in the past over silly or just plain inaccurate reviews.
This message last edited by RandAllThor on 22/09/2009 at 12:23:36 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1826 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1161 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 562 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1101 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 563 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 946 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 562 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 611 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 676 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 612 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 618 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 564 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 610 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 955 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 555 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 561 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1082 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 569 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 973 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1260 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 551 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 540 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 547 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 596 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 975 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 606 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 918 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 557 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 557 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 554 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 526 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1000 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 961 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 948 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 584 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1023 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1496 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1012 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1185 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1083 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1008 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 963 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1135 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1378 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 967 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1154 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 894 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 963 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 878 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1086 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1195 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 999 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1083 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 894 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 973 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 529 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 943 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 895 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1067 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1154 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 943 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1239 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1037 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 957 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 582 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 530 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 545 Views

Reply to Message