Active Users:417 Time:16/06/2025 05:38:44 PM
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
Are you willing to be the one who makes sure the poster actually has a pre-release copy? Or are you just willing to make more work for someone else? If you are actually willing to do the actual work, how pray tell will you do that? What kind of proof can the reviewers provide? Scanned copyright page? anybody can fake those. ISBN #? already published. Get real man.


I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.

Umm...You ever heard of Napster? All it would take would be one quote from the book and TOR would be completely within it's rights to shut RAFO down. Are YOU personally willing to be legally responsible for something that someone posts here? Sorry but I'm not. And sure, anybody at any time can post anything here. But by providing a spot for pirates to post what they want, the situation changes to "abetting and encouraging".


I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?

If the admins have a serious concern about legal liability, I say don't allow the reviews. If the only serious concern is one of authenticity/credibility, though, I don't see the problem. RAFO isn't vauching for the reviews in any way, and no WoT sites that I know of have been made laughing stocks in the past over silly or just plain inaccurate reviews.
This message last edited by RandAllThor on 22/09/2009 at 12:23:36 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1763 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1104 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 524 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1035 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 529 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 887 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 525 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 576 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 639 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 577 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 587 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 528 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 577 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 900 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 520 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 534 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1015 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 541 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 918 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1203 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 507 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 514 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 522 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 562 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 913 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 572 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 854 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 526 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 525 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 521 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 496 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 947 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 905 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 895 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 553 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 976 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1438 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 945 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1090 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1028 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 939 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 913 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1075 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1315 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 910 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1093 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 838 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 906 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 808 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1030 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1147 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 939 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1034 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 827 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 911 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 495 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 881 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 839 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1010 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1096 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 894 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1157 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 959 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 902 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 542 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 502 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 509 Views

Reply to Message