Active Users:446 Time:16/06/2025 05:07:35 PM
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM
By providing a specific place for "pre-release" previews, and not enforcing any kind of spoiler, quoting or etc, you are placing yourself in a position of being charged with "abetting and encouraging" piracy. Not a good idea.

NaCl(think I'll just go over to 13th Depository)H2O


The NAPSTER analogy only works if the book itself was being copied for illegal distribution, which obviously would be wrong on every level.

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.

Typically, publishers do not hand out NDAs because it is really not worth the hassle. And if they're not handing out an NDA to be signed, there is nothing they can do once they've sent a book out for review. Obviously if the book has been stolen from the warehouse or the office (as happened with HARRY POTTER a few times), that is a legal matter.

Sensible bloggers will, of course, abide by any 'requests' that the publishers send along with the book (such as to wait until such and such a date or ensure a strict no-spoiler policy), otherwise they may find themselves not getting review copies of TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT or A MEMORY OF LIGHT - or indeed anything else Tor or Orbit ever publish ever again - when the time comes.

I'm seeing the Orbit reps tomorrow, so I might get some additional clarification on the ground rules and things that people seem worried about here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1762 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1103 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 523 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1034 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 528 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 887 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 525 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 576 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 638 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 576 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 586 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 528 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 576 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 900 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 519 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 533 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1014 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 540 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 917 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1202 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 506 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 513 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 521 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 562 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 912 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 571 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 854 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 525 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 524 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 520 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 495 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 947 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 905 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 894 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 552 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 975 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1437 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 944 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1089 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1027 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 938 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 912 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1074 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1314 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 909 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1092 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 837 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 905 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 807 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1029 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1146 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 938 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1033 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 826 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 911 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 495 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 880 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 839 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1010 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1096 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 894 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1156 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 959 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 902 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 542 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 502 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 509 Views

Reply to Message