Active Users:476 Time:18/09/2025 12:32:05 PM
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM
By providing a specific place for "pre-release" previews, and not enforcing any kind of spoiler, quoting or etc, you are placing yourself in a position of being charged with "abetting and encouraging" piracy. Not a good idea.

NaCl(think I'll just go over to 13th Depository)H2O


The NAPSTER analogy only works if the book itself was being copied for illegal distribution, which obviously would be wrong on every level.

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.

Typically, publishers do not hand out NDAs because it is really not worth the hassle. And if they're not handing out an NDA to be signed, there is nothing they can do once they've sent a book out for review. Obviously if the book has been stolen from the warehouse or the office (as happened with HARRY POTTER a few times), that is a legal matter.

Sensible bloggers will, of course, abide by any 'requests' that the publishers send along with the book (such as to wait until such and such a date or ensure a strict no-spoiler policy), otherwise they may find themselves not getting review copies of TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT or A MEMORY OF LIGHT - or indeed anything else Tor or Orbit ever publish ever again - when the time comes.

I'm seeing the Orbit reps tomorrow, so I might get some additional clarification on the ground rules and things that people seem worried about here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1828 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1161 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 562 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1101 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 563 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 947 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 562 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 611 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 676 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 612 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 618 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 565 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 610 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 955 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 555 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 561 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1083 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 569 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 973 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1261 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 551 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 540 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 548 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 596 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 975 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 606 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 918 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 557 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 557 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 554 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 526 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1000 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 961 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 948 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 584 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1024 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1496 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1012 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1185 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1083 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1009 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 963 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1135 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1378 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 968 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1155 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 894 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 963 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 878 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1086 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1195 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1000 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1083 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 894 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 973 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 530 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 943 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 898 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1067 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1157 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 943 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1239 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1037 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 960 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 582 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 530 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 547 Views

Reply to Message