Active Users:939 Time:25/09/2026 06:22:29 AM
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM
By providing a specific place for "pre-release" previews, and not enforcing any kind of spoiler, quoting or etc, you are placing yourself in a position of being charged with "abetting and encouraging" piracy. Not a good idea.

NaCl(think I'll just go over to 13th Depository)H2O


The NAPSTER analogy only works if the book itself was being copied for illegal distribution, which obviously would be wrong on every level.

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.

Typically, publishers do not hand out NDAs because it is really not worth the hassle. And if they're not handing out an NDA to be signed, there is nothing they can do once they've sent a book out for review. Obviously if the book has been stolen from the warehouse or the office (as happened with HARRY POTTER a few times), that is a legal matter.

Sensible bloggers will, of course, abide by any 'requests' that the publishers send along with the book (such as to wait until such and such a date or ensure a strict no-spoiler policy), otherwise they may find themselves not getting review copies of TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT or A MEMORY OF LIGHT - or indeed anything else Tor or Orbit ever publish ever again - when the time comes.

I'm seeing the Orbit reps tomorrow, so I might get some additional clarification on the ground rules and things that people seem worried about here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2130 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1472 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 721 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1384 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 728 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1199 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 746 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 765 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 869 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 780 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 770 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 741 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 788 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1250 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 717 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 709 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1355 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 743 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1226 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1581 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 723 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 694 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 705 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 746 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1264 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 765 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1169 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 697 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 722 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 712 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 670 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1334 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1240 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1223 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 767 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1306 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1767 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1312 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1478 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1423 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1313 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1226 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1432 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1639 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1291 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1461 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1140 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1260 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1194 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1410 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1493 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1283 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1391 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1179 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1220 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 676 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1249 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1158 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1385 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1504 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1182 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1537 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1357 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1238 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 712 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 700 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 681 Views

Reply to Message