Much as I dislike disparaging someone elses review of a book, I'd imagine a majority of the people here that voted yes would have been happy for no further reviews if it weren't for the how little the TGS review from Jason can be trusted.
And that is all due to the now infamous review of Crossroads of Twilight by him. That implied the book was going to be packed with action and events, marking a return to the pace of books 1-6.
As these are going to be spoiler free reviews, I can clearly state (and I wouldn't be the only one), that my reason for wanting to see other reviews pre-release is to see just how accurate his TGS review is. Ie. is TGS REALLY as fast paced as KOD, is it that much darker? Is there a scene most will think is dramatic, etc.
And that is all due to the now infamous review of Crossroads of Twilight by him. That implied the book was going to be packed with action and events, marking a return to the pace of books 1-6.
As these are going to be spoiler free reviews, I can clearly state (and I wouldn't be the only one), that my reason for wanting to see other reviews pre-release is to see just how accurate his TGS review is. Ie. is TGS REALLY as fast paced as KOD, is it that much darker? Is there a scene most will think is dramatic, etc.
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
- 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM
1892 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM
594 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM
662 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option?
- 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM
1101 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM*
- 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM
622 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
- 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM
988 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM*
- 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM
591 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM*
- 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM
575 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM*
- 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM
1042 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess
- 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM
1087 Views
No
- 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM
1067 Views
I think you missread the rules...
- 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
1524 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work?
- 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM
1046 Views
I'm strongly against it
- 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM
1239 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list
- 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
1142 Views
- 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
1142 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
- 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM
1056 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
- 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM
996 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
- 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
1181 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
- 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM
1199 Views
I had no idea about these legalities.
- 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM
1021 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities.
- 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM
918 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame?
- 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM
928 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak.
- 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM
986 Views
Ever hear of Napster?
- 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM
922 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
- 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM
1122 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
- 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM
1275 Views

*NM*