Active Users:464 Time:27/03/2026 05:36:23 AM
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst Send a noteboard - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM
Much as I dislike disparaging someone elses review of a book, I'd imagine a majority of the people here that voted yes would have been happy for no further reviews if it weren't for the how little the TGS review from Jason can be trusted.

And that is all due to the now infamous review of Crossroads of Twilight by him. That implied the book was going to be packed with action and events, marking a return to the pace of books 1-6.

As these are going to be spoiler free reviews, I can clearly state (and I wouldn't be the only one), that my reason for wanting to see other reviews pre-release is to see just how accurate his TGS review is. Ie. is TGS REALLY as fast paced as KOD, is it that much darker? Is there a scene most will think is dramatic, etc.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1995 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1308 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 637 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1255 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 623 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1062 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 682 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 683 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 765 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 679 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 687 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 665 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 703 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1087 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 626 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 632 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1208 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 648 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1094 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1410 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 643 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 613 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 614 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 663 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1128 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 683 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1045 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 616 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 634 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 625 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 598 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1164 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1087 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1079 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 669 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1184 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1615 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1162 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1342 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1280 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1165 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1093 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1280 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1502 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1141 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1320 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1015 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1128 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1045 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1249 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1345 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1148 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1210 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1029 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1101 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 604 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1096 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1020 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1231 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1315 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1060 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1372 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1204 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1099 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 639 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 607 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 614 Views

Reply to Message