Active Users:1655 Time:25/12/2025 12:27:46 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead Send a noteboard - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM
Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.


That's true. Although I think Tor do need to get a bit of a grip. This isn't the new JK Rowling or Dan Brown or Stephen King. Strictly enforcing street dates and refusing to let anyone review the book before it comes out, especially in the current situation with a new author taking over, is a brilliant way of reducing first-week sales until people wait to hear if it's any good or not (Jason's review not being regarded very well, it has to be said).

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.


I thought that's what we were talking about: did we want reviews (spoilery or otherwise) a couple of days before the book was coming out? That's why I was a little surprised at the huge discussion going on about it. We're not talking about review copies arriving next week, a month before the book comes out. It's entirely possible, unless the street date is rigorously enforced (and it wasn't for the previous books in the series), that the book will be on shelves anything up to a week before its official date, so reviews and spoilers will start appearing then anyway.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1925 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 614 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1247 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 607 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1177 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 597 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1006 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 645 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 656 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 732 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 681 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 659 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 665 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 628 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 672 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 1135 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 635 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1030 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 596 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 605 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1143 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 618 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1039 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1353 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 614 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 587 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 615 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 590 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 635 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1064 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 660 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 983 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 596 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 609 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 591 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 595 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 572 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1102 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1034 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1021 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 1064 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 1135 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 644 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1117 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1554 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1090 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1273 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1192 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1095 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1025 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1214 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1450 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1080 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1240 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 966 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1061 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 964 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1186 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1292 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1073 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1151 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 966 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1038 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 579 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1027 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 948 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1154 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1248 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1007 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1308 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1132 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1043 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 612 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 578 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 579 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes