Daigian could well be lower than the 62.5% number RJ stated as we know the Tower has been weakening for centuries.
Daigian meets the current standards, if barely (if she didn't she would not have be allowed to pass the test for the shawl, she'd had remained an Accepted, constrained to remain in TV). RJ said only 32.5% of women are strong enough to meet them. It's possible the standards have been lowered at some point, though the AS seem to imply they did not (one of them mentioned at some point that despite the decreasing strength and the fact less and less candidates could meet the standards, they were not to lower them...) but 32,5% of women was the current state of things anyway (or RJ would have specified the number applied to a past state of things, not the current one...), and that forcibly includes Daigian at the minimal required level to be allowed to past the test.
My point being a combination of declining numbers and declining strength could easily lead to declining standards. Daigian was clearly dedicated to earning the Shawl, the AS may well have decided to lower the standard to keep numbers up. Obviously I'm in pure speculation territory, but Daigian could just as easily be an example of the decline of the WT as anything else. Ultimately it has little bearing on Bell Curves etc...
The context of the Q&A makes it very clear RJ was referring to the story's contemporary WT standards.
She lies exactly on that boundary that RJ was referring to.
I actually think she lies below this boundary. She seems to be too weak to become an AS but got through using perseverance. The fact that most AS treat her as little better than a wilder demonstrates this. I think she is significantly below the next strongest AS, whomever that is. It makes no difference though, Daigian's strength has never been a direct marker of OP strength like Lanfear or Egwene's has. She's merely a name for the weakest AS level, and whether its Daigain or Vandene or Adeleas makes no difference.
RJ said 37.5% of female channelers fall below the level required to qualify for the Shawl.
It is clearly stressed that Daigian passed this test by a hairsbreadth.
Hence, Daigian clearly falls on this boundary. Put differently, you cannot be weaker than Daigian and still pass the test.
So therefore we know to a very high degree of accuracy that Daigian falls on this 37.5% boundary, or as close to it as a living channeler can apparently be.
From that point we can extrapolate the rest, as we know the number of SD's that cover the percentage of the population between 37.5% and 50%. It is 0.32SD exactly, if I recall correctly. One third of an SD, rounded for quick reference purposes.
The rest of the formula falls into place then, proving that a normal distribution is impossible, given the strength facts we are given in the series.
It doesn't matter who the weakest AS is. I agree that she is that marker, but its also irrelevant if its someone else because Daigain doesn't appear anywhere else with proportionality e.g. "Daigian was less than half as strong as Verin". I'm merely voicing a private theory that Daigian is probably a lot weaker than the woman above her. She spent more time as a novice and accepted than anyone in living memory. It doesn't affect anyone's theories though, but I honestly believe that Aes Sedai have strengths of between 10 and 30, that the 10 is the lower limit shared by several women, and that Daigian is on 6 or 8.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
How many standard deviations is Lanfear
- 15/11/2012 06:04:39 PM
2672 Views
Hmm...
- 15/11/2012 07:25:34 PM
1769 Views
see we CAN agree on stuff
- 15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
1593 Views
- 18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
1463 Views
- 15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
1593 Views
- 18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
1463 Views
Re:
- 18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
1676 Views
- 18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
1676 Views
Re:
- 19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
1511 Views
- 19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
1511 Views
Re:
- 19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
1504 Views
- 19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
1504 Views
They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
- 19/11/2012 03:19:19 PM
1561 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
- 19/11/2012 04:01:43 PM
1723 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
- 19/11/2012 09:04:04 PM
1475 Views
Hmmm...
- 20/11/2012 02:08:40 AM
1533 Views
Perhaps, but Egwene is also being a bit dramatic in the scene as she managed
- 20/11/2012 04:28:57 AM
1524 Views
Nope...
- 20/11/2012 03:13:13 PM
1592 Views
I believe she is being over dramatic
- 20/11/2012 03:26:24 PM
1437 Views
Keep believing that...
- 20/11/2012 03:30:14 PM
1591 Views
*shrugs*
- 20/11/2012 03:49:10 PM
1565 Views
Tired and forkroot are the same now?
- 20/11/2012 03:55:22 PM
1463 Views
No it's the literary device
- 20/11/2012 04:04:28 PM
1573 Views
Impossible. Daigian is exactly 0.32SD below the mean
- 19/11/2012 11:06:04 AM
1512 Views
You keep saying that, but it is either a linear or a non-linear distribution
- 19/11/2012 09:09:32 PM
1585 Views
That's the whole point. Thanks for finally seeing it.
- 19/11/2012 09:43:27 PM
1554 Views
keep believing that ... but you making up numbers isn't really relevant *NM*
- 20/11/2012 04:29:44 AM
926 Views
Please show me a number that is made up. The 0.32SD for Daigian is a rule of statistics.
- 20/11/2012 07:15:48 AM
1470 Views
Ugh. I hate power level discussions. For real world applications, it should be kind of meaningless
- 16/11/2012 10:28:49 PM
1444 Views
I don't really agree
- 18/11/2012 08:40:53 PM
1426 Views
Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
- 19/11/2012 09:13:48 PM
1455 Views
Re: Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
- 20/11/2012 08:10:01 AM
1448 Views
Since I've proven that it's not a normal distribution in units of absolute strength, SDs don't apply
- 17/11/2012 07:48:21 PM
1538 Views
You have proven nothing, except that you have an opinion *NM*
- 18/11/2012 02:21:35 AM
911 Views
You simply don't get it. It is mathematically a fact. There is no opinion involved.
- 18/11/2012 02:19:40 PM
1297 Views
Only because you've assigned numeric values. That you created.
- 18/11/2012 02:40:51 PM
1468 Views
It doesn't matter what figure you use...
- 18/11/2012 03:01:56 PM
1375 Views
What if Daigian is one third Lanfear's strength?
- 18/11/2012 04:37:58 PM
1519 Views
Sure you can
- 18/11/2012 10:09:31 PM
1515 Views
Re: Sure you can
- 18/11/2012 10:54:50 PM
1489 Views
You're right, though its 37.5%
- 19/11/2012 12:21:29 AM
1469 Views
Oops, typo!
- 19/11/2012 02:54:25 AM
1523 Views
Again, not possible, due to Daigian being just 0.3SD below the Mean
- 19/11/2012 08:37:01 AM
1456 Views
Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 19/11/2012 04:05:12 PM
1380 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 19/11/2012 05:55:02 PM
1318 Views
Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
- 19/11/2012 09:19:50 PM
1441 Views
Re: Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
- 20/11/2012 02:11:26 AM
1527 Views
Forkroot in every case
- 20/11/2012 04:32:26 AM
1434 Views
No!
- 20/11/2012 03:15:16 PM
1454 Views
I'm not going to go re-read the books to you on this
- 20/11/2012 03:39:46 PM
1423 Views
You need to read it for yourself, since you're completely confused.
- 20/11/2012 03:54:26 PM
1446 Views
Not going to argue this with you.
- 20/11/2012 04:09:44 PM
1343 Views
Your own example disproved your point...
- 20/11/2012 04:39:25 PM
1488 Views
let's see, she's both asleep and would need hours to regain her strength
- 20/11/2012 04:43:17 PM
1380 Views
Enough!
- 20/11/2012 05:04:06 PM
1461 Views
LOL ... whatever. You go on believing that ... no one else sees it this way. *NM*
- 20/11/2012 05:20:52 PM
913 Views
Re: Your own example disproved your point...
- 20/11/2012 05:10:15 PM
1459 Views
Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than
- 20/11/2012 05:26:31 PM
1488 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 20/11/2012 02:26:47 AM
1377 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 20/11/2012 09:03:40 AM
1458 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 20/11/2012 02:59:08 PM
1453 Views
None of this is backed by any evidence...
- 20/11/2012 03:24:12 PM
1367 Views
who said Cadsuane was 1.5x Moiraine or more?
- 20/11/2012 04:03:13 PM
1393 Views
Nope...
- 20/11/2012 04:41:35 PM
1395 Views
wrong
- 20/11/2012 04:48:50 PM
1360 Views
Better evidence? LOL!
- 20/11/2012 03:18:55 PM
1437 Views
Huh? How did you come to that conclusion?
- 20/11/2012 04:40:56 PM
1449 Views
BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene?
- 20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM
1333 Views
I'm not arguing that. I agree that Cadsuane is pretty close to Egwene
- 20/11/2012 05:50:34 PM
1491 Views
Interesting, but let's go with your figures...
- 19/11/2012 06:54:54 AM
1517 Views
Indeed
- 19/11/2012 08:16:44 AM
1540 Views
Rand is sort of a special case
- 20/11/2012 04:25:02 AM
1433 Views
Regarding Mesaana...
- 20/11/2012 08:42:56 AM
1431 Views
You continue to mix two things
- 20/11/2012 03:24:44 PM
1349 Views
No
- 20/11/2012 04:54:19 PM
1585 Views
You are mistaken
- 20/11/2012 05:04:40 PM
1399 Views
Probably, but the AS have no idea what 37.5% means
- 19/11/2012 02:59:26 AM
1419 Views
It's irrelevant
- 19/11/2012 03:46:42 AM
1472 Views
Agreed. Daigian is the marker of the absolute bottom of Aes Sedai strength.
- 19/11/2012 06:55:41 AM
1436 Views
Daigian
- 19/11/2012 08:12:19 AM
1431 Views
It is a direct marker due to RJ's quote
- 19/11/2012 08:50:26 AM
1479 Views
You missed my point
- 19/11/2012 09:08:42 AM
1391 Views
Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
- 20/11/2012 04:41:11 AM
1399 Views
Re: Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
- 20/11/2012 09:07:49 AM
1374 Views
Re: Sure you can
- 19/11/2012 09:22:09 AM
1542 Views
Care to explain this...
- 19/11/2012 05:06:28 PM
1334 Views
Indeed
- 20/11/2012 07:16:37 AM
1540 Views
Explained far better than I ever could. Bravo.
- 20/11/2012 07:30:29 AM
1412 Views
Well duh.
- 20/11/2012 02:57:24 PM
1499 Views
Incorrect.
- 20/11/2012 04:28:07 PM
1491 Views
No
- 20/11/2012 04:44:16 PM
1472 Views
You're integrating without lower limits...
- 20/11/2012 02:55:06 PM
1440 Views
We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
- 20/11/2012 04:44:24 AM
1280 Views
Re: We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
- 20/11/2012 07:02:47 AM
1475 Views
You must tell me of this special math...
- 20/11/2012 03:10:09 PM
1374 Views
Re: You must tell me of this special math...
- 20/11/2012 04:29:40 PM
1436 Views
Morghase is a placeholder...
- 20/11/2012 04:45:42 PM
1523 Views
Well...
- 18/11/2012 08:43:59 PM
1492 Views
Re: Well...
- 19/11/2012 03:40:44 PM
1476 Views
Wow.
- 19/11/2012 03:53:47 PM
1505 Views
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
- 19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM
1449 Views
Re: Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
- 19/11/2012 07:42:58 PM
1343 Views
this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
- 20/11/2012 04:51:20 AM
1497 Views
Re: this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
- 20/11/2012 02:45:18 PM
1430 Views
I think RJ went out of his way to keep strength a bit of a mystery
- 20/11/2012 08:42:44 PM
1441 Views
Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
- 21/11/2012 05:12:24 PM
1431 Views
the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
- 22/11/2012 02:55:03 AM
1503 Views
Re: the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
- 22/11/2012 03:15:33 AM
1793 Views
I do not think you can calculate the Mean without knowing the Units of Power
- 22/11/2012 03:53:59 AM
1570 Views
