Active Users:999 Time:02/11/2025 10:31:15 PM
Balefire is REALLY confusing. Datakim Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM
Nynaeve's boat in aCoS proves nothing. It moved back a hundred paces because the oarsmen were balefired.

If the boat had a thread, one part of it being balefired would have meant the whole boat would be balefired. That did not happen.

I'm sure that the coat scene in tGS was a mistake, and BS was mistaken when he said objects had threads.


That is what I always thought. Though to be fair, that does not quite explain why it is that the boat was suddenly underwater. The way the whole thing works is that when Moghedien balefired the oarsmen, the boat should indeed have jumped back to the point where the men stopped rowing. but the boat itself should still have been afloat at that point and only started sinking then and there.

However the boat actually disappears and then appears already sinking and hits the bottom of the river almost at once. The only explanation I have is that there was something wrong with the boat that would have caused it to sink (a leak) but one of the oarsmen noticed it and fixed it. But when the oarsman was balefired, the problem was not fixed and the boat had sunk. But I figure thats a poor explanation. The whole thing is strange and inconsistent.

.... Wait a minute. If the oarsmen were balefired, then the boat would not have been moving as fast, which means it would have been further up(down?) the river, which means it should not have been there for Moghedien to balefire in the first place.

ARGH!

I will say that what BS says is a bit strange too. He says that a stone in the wall has a thread. Ok. But what happens if you take that stone, and cut it in two. Does the thread split suddenly, creating two threads. Or what? And why is it that the stone has a single thread rather than being composed of countless millions of tiny threads for each particular molecule that makes up the stone.

If the stone has a thread, what happens if you blow it to a million tiny pieces. Does the pattern suddenly create a million new threads from thin air?

Maybe that is how Rand will seal the DO. He will just take a big rock (with a single thread) and blow it to pieces at Shayol Ghul, creating many many millions of new threads from all the fragmented pieces and these newly created threads will then proceed to knit the hole in the pattern shut, repairing the bore.

Yeah.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2491 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1226 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1086 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1062 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 958 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 905 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4632 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 888 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 930 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 842 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 845 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 869 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 839 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 915 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 943 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 858 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 925 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1053 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 877 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 460 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 893 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 808 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 758 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1070 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 912 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 950 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 930 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 468 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1068 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 952 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 882 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 914 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 972 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 841 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 903 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 444 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 815 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 837 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 434 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 437 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 864 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 958 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 909 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 814 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 825 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1038 Views

Reply to Message