On the Carrows, I take it? That is disturbing, yes... the gloves have to come off, okay, but it should be harder for him than that.

That's true, but still... kind of odd that after book five, Harry still profits from the connection so much while Voldemort doesn't.

Not really, or I wouldn't be complaining about her lack of depth. And there are moments in the series that she's a bit of a bitch - early on to the Weasleys, most notably, even if they exaggerate enormously in the complaining about her. But here, I just don't see it.

Yes, but Molly has seven children - it would be a big feminist statement indeed to have her have a career while raising seven children. Fleur seems to have given up on the idea of a career from the start of her marriage, though of course the circumstances make having a career hard for everyone.

As an economist, I cannot really see the difficulty. Either the contract of sale contains such a clausule, or it does not. If the transaction was concluded by both parties of their own free will, the one whose view was not mentioned in the contract of sale has nobody but himself to blame.

That's true... at one point I seem to remember it was to implied just about every Dark wizard worth a damn had at least toyed with the idea of a Horcrux, but then if we look at our sample size of two, Grindelwald doesn't seem to have had one, so that reduces it to 50%. Slughorn knew about them, but then he's an academic and I believe older than either of them. I guess it's impossible to tell.