It came across (whether intended or not) as an attack on SF/F with a claim that "mainstream" was better.
The point is that reading solely for fun is limiting, and the printed word has much more to offer. The post was in defense of variety.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
In Support of Other Fiction
- 01/12/2009 09:06:14 PM
2395 Views
- 01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM
1446 Views
- 01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM
1446 Views
Re:
- 01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM
1452 Views
- 01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM
1452 Views
you shouldn't feel the need to defend a non SF/F suggestion, just don't
- 03/12/2009 03:34:28 PM
1437 Views
Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
- 01/12/2009 09:46:35 PM
1381 Views
I would counter that the stripping away removes a level of reality.
- 01/12/2009 10:05:28 PM
1461 Views
That's a Slippery Slope Because You Could Argue On the Same Basis That All Fiction Does That.
- 01/12/2009 11:34:34 PM
1512 Views
I don't see the slippery slope, but rather, a confirmation of my original point.
- 02/12/2009 01:41:24 AM
1429 Views
perhaps some university will do a study
- 03/12/2009 03:55:54 PM
1426 Views
I'd like to see it
- 03/12/2009 09:15:12 PM
1453 Views
I Think I'll Post a Thread on This.
- 03/12/2009 06:47:05 PM
1390 Views
I'd like to see it.
- 03/12/2009 09:23:07 PM
1471 Views
Regarding depth in Jordan
- 03/12/2009 09:31:19 PM
1423 Views
I was thinking about that too
- 03/12/2009 10:05:40 PM
1412 Views
Re: I was thinking about that too
- 03/12/2009 10:09:26 PM
1486 Views
Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
- 03/12/2009 10:18:08 PM
1352 Views
Re: Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
- 03/12/2009 10:30:15 PM
1428 Views
It would. Destroying the Wheel would likely make him a Buddhist.
- 03/12/2009 10:51:17 PM
1377 Views
I Totally Missed That.
- 04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM
1516 Views
- 04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM
1516 Views
Re: I Totally Missed That.
- 04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM
1451 Views
- 04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM
1451 Views
I Don't Believe It Cursory, But Comparative.
- 04/12/2009 11:29:36 PM
1580 Views
Re: Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
- 02/12/2009 12:28:30 AM
1411 Views
I find Michel Houellebecq to be one of the most intriguing writers of our time
- 01/12/2009 11:14:05 PM
1494 Views
wait! there's somebody "dirtier" than Piers Anthony or Philip Jose Farmer???
- 03/12/2009 04:00:28 PM
1469 Views
Nice post.
- 02/12/2009 12:03:09 AM
1505 Views
I guess I'll break my silence after almost a month and a half...
- 02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM
1511 Views
- 02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM
1511 Views
Popcorn?
- 02/12/2009 12:31:44 AM
1448 Views
I'm glad I could drive you from your Carthusian retreat, Larry
- 02/12/2009 01:58:49 AM
1452 Views
- 02/12/2009 01:58:49 AM
1452 Views
It won't last for long - have too many things still to deal with in my life
- 02/12/2009 02:36:15 AM
1465 Views
- 02/12/2009 02:36:15 AM
1465 Views
That's too bad. I'll have to learn monasterial sign language to continue a dialogue.
- 02/12/2009 03:49:01 AM
1382 Views
I concur
- 02/12/2009 12:27:13 AM
1393 Views
I like your framing of the issue (and Shannara is the Taco Bell of writing).
- 02/12/2009 02:03:51 AM
1461 Views
Am i the only one who reads books for fun?
- 02/12/2009 12:33:52 AM
1483 Views
I certainly didn't read The Lost Symbol for ANY cultural, intellectual or edifying reason.
- 02/12/2009 02:05:45 AM
1409 Views
it didn't come across that way
- 03/12/2009 05:15:36 PM
1409 Views
Of course not. Personally, I don't touch anything other than mind candy when I'm in school,
- 02/12/2009 03:29:23 AM
1411 Views
one of the things that is important to me in books/shows
- 03/12/2009 05:20:29 PM
1326 Views
WoT has decent characterization, though a little overwrought. Harrington... not so much.
- 04/12/2009 04:26:43 AM
1594 Views
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a science fiction/fantasy movie.
- 02/12/2009 12:54:08 AM
1472 Views
Reading only speculative literature is limiting and monotonous.
- 02/12/2009 02:09:42 AM
1488 Views
I was going to say exactly that about "real" literature: monotonous and limiting.
- 02/12/2009 01:57:49 PM
1437 Views
I would not disagree with you if you said that.
- 02/12/2009 02:27:08 PM
1339 Views
Most non-speculative fiction is fluff as well though.
- 03/12/2009 05:38:32 PM
1315 Views
Which brings us back to my point.
- 03/12/2009 08:04:24 PM
1439 Views
I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
- 04/12/2009 05:24:02 PM
1333 Views
Re: I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
- 04/12/2009 10:42:33 PM
1364 Views
Actually, it is a film that does not fit neatly into one category
- 02/12/2009 11:16:20 AM
1445 Views
Science Fiction is the most PERTINANT form of fiction in the world today
- 02/12/2009 12:57:19 AM
1449 Views
"Pertinent", not "Pertinant". If it weren't in all caps I'd have ignored it this time.
- 02/12/2009 02:13:36 AM
1442 Views
SF&F and 'real literature' are not mutually exclusive
- 02/12/2009 01:19:05 AM
1413 Views
So why don't we occasionally focus on "real" books that are technically spec fiction?
- 02/12/2009 01:25:04 AM
1351 Views
Why must we limit our focus in that way?
- 02/12/2009 02:20:11 AM
1370 Views
I don't see it as limiting or forcing.
- 02/12/2009 03:16:07 AM
1378 Views
"Elite club" or "elitist clique"?
- 02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM
1350 Views
- 02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM
1350 Views
Elite club is how we midwestern rednecks refer to Elitist Clique. *chews on a piece of hay*
- 02/12/2009 02:52:01 PM
1540 Views
I was born in the Midwest.
- 02/12/2009 03:01:36 PM
1390 Views
I know.
- 02/12/2009 03:12:05 PM
1381 Views
...!
- 02/12/2009 03:17:57 PM
1340 Views
Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
- 02/12/2009 03:29:31 PM
1407 Views
Re: Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
- 02/12/2009 03:31:26 PM
1336 Views
Huh! I really didn't think of you as being a masochist.
- 02/12/2009 01:51:55 AM
1372 Views
Read what you like to read.
- 02/12/2009 04:18:53 AM
1496 Views
I'll super size you. Fine. *NM*
- 02/12/2009 04:32:58 AM
678 Views
Oh noes! I'm getting word-fat!
- 02/12/2009 04:59:05 AM
1389 Views
I seem to have struck a nerve.
- 02/12/2009 05:20:27 AM
1392 Views
Apparently not the nerve you think, though.
- 02/12/2009 06:42:02 AM
1477 Views
Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
- 02/12/2009 02:13:10 PM
1425 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
- 02/12/2009 09:40:28 PM
1472 Views
I really did get under your skin
- 02/12/2009 09:58:18 PM
1312 Views
Tom as much as you raise some great points, you are being a condescending ass.
- 03/12/2009 04:26:27 AM
1380 Views
You're entitled to your opinion. I don't care.
- 03/12/2009 04:51:18 AM
1349 Views
I keep replying. It's like a sickness.
- 03/12/2009 05:15:28 AM
1368 Views
Hm.
- 02/12/2009 06:58:56 AM
1977 Views
Re-read my exact point.
- 02/12/2009 02:18:20 PM
1322 Views
No. Some kind of reading is indeed essential.
- 02/12/2009 02:28:22 PM
1456 Views
There may have been an assumption about literature due to the reason for the post.
- 02/12/2009 02:37:47 PM
1406 Views
Somehow I get the feeling that this post hasn't caused quite as much controversy
- 02/12/2009 06:53:18 AM
1489 Views
As I see it...
- 02/12/2009 11:38:07 AM
1374 Views
Yep.
- 02/12/2009 02:18:22 PM
1519 Views
Re: Yep.
- 02/12/2009 03:35:38 PM
1379 Views
Euripides was poorly received, initially.
- 02/12/2009 03:57:58 PM
1307 Views
I wasn't looking to generate controversy
- 02/12/2009 02:19:13 PM
1503 Views
Well... then I'm going to have to agree with Craig a bit.
- 02/12/2009 02:32:59 PM
1486 Views
Well, I was being somewhat denigrating. "Unnecessarily" or not is a matter of debate.
- 02/12/2009 02:40:29 PM
1327 Views
Well, it's only "unnecessary" if you don't want people to be turned off of your message immediately. *NM*
- 02/12/2009 09:42:46 PM
657 Views
Judging from the responses, most people weren't turned off immediately.
- 02/12/2009 09:59:35 PM
1308 Views
All reading of fiction is a diversion by the very nature of the activity.
- 02/12/2009 03:43:05 PM
1373 Views
Diversion from direct action, yes. Diversion from reality, no.
- 02/12/2009 04:15:48 PM
1337 Views
I maintain that all acts of reading fiction are a diversion from reality/ the realistic
- 02/12/2009 05:43:16 PM
1356 Views
It seems a regressive argument to me.
- 03/12/2009 01:18:02 AM
1304 Views
You're playing a game.
- 03/12/2009 03:40:14 PM
1405 Views
I fundamentally agree with much of what you're saying, but there is a distinction.
- 03/12/2009 06:44:02 PM
1407 Views
Spec fic is perhaps at it's best in autocracies?
- 02/12/2009 04:10:56 PM
1278 Views
Bulgakov
- 02/12/2009 04:25:17 PM
1409 Views
I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
- 02/12/2009 04:36:09 PM
1359 Views
Re: I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
- 02/12/2009 04:40:16 PM
1271 Views
Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
- 02/12/2009 05:17:31 PM
1337 Views
Re: Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
- 02/12/2009 05:40:16 PM
1370 Views
I suppose.
- 02/12/2009 06:26:30 PM
1352 Views
Re: I suppose.
- 02/12/2009 07:25:26 PM
1374 Views
This was something I was exploring earlier.
- 02/12/2009 04:34:41 PM
1429 Views
Funny thing about the hivemind antagonist.
- 02/12/2009 05:13:30 PM
1349 Views
I didn't see the zombies reading speculative fiction
- 02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM
1458 Views
- 02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM
1458 Views
Oh, they prefer Clive Cussler.
- 02/12/2009 06:23:42 PM
1416 Views
There's an interesting book in Russian that might be translated somewhere.
- 02/12/2009 10:02:48 PM
1434 Views
i think it comes more down to quality than genre.
- 02/12/2009 04:55:20 PM
1387 Views
I disagree with the ultimate conclusion but agree with many of your points.
- 02/12/2009 05:43:04 PM
1362 Views
the illiad is a classic
- 02/12/2009 06:35:24 PM
1373 Views
There's only one "L" in Iliad
- 02/12/2009 08:18:38 PM
1342 Views
It took me a few minutes to agree
- 02/12/2009 07:04:59 PM
1355 Views
Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post!
- 02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM
1360 Views
- 02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM
1360 Views
Many people have mentioned that there's quite a bit of good sff lit out there and you seem to agree.
- 02/12/2009 07:33:42 PM
1455 Views
The website is called "Read and Find Out". It doesn't specify what we're supposed to read.
- 02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM
1427 Views
- 02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM
1427 Views
Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this.
- 02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM
1387 Views
Heh
- 02/12/2009 09:56:30 PM
1374 Views
I have a few objections.
- 03/12/2009 12:24:43 AM
1391 Views
where else should we talk about it?
- 03/12/2009 12:37:26 AM
1388 Views
There's a difference between having threads about it and focusing the official book club on it.
- 03/12/2009 12:40:53 AM
1441 Views
This is the Sci-Fi and Fantasy Board for site optimization purposes.
- 03/12/2009 01:07:39 AM
14360 Views
random thoughts stole my subject line
- 03/12/2009 01:56:07 AM
1429 Views
I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy
- 03/12/2009 02:12:01 AM
1397 Views
That's it
- 03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM
1507 Views
- 03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM
1507 Views
Question: is it really science fiction without one of the following:
- 03/12/2009 05:13:21 AM
1378 Views
technically speaking, fantasy is classed as a sub heading under science fiction. *NM*
- 03/12/2009 02:51:12 PM
587 Views
Yes, it is but actually...
- 03/12/2009 09:31:44 PM
1375 Views
But Dan Brown rocks da house!!!
*NM*
- 03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM
688 Views
*NM*
- 03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM
688 Views
another thing wrong with your argument
- 03/12/2009 03:30:19 PM
1402 Views
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad.
- 03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM
1193 Views
sorry about my atrocious spelling
(including the one on pertinent)
- 03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM
1478 Views
(including the one on pertinent)
- 03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM
1478 Views
is it just me, or is this now the largest post/thread yet on RAFO.com??? 168 replies so far! *NM*
- 03/12/2009 05:03:25 PM
633 Views
Congratulations on the replies count
- 03/12/2009 09:30:41 PM
1481 Views
That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
- 03/12/2009 10:50:29 PM
1402 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
- 04/12/2009 07:44:56 PM
1440 Views
But the objective truth of a setting can be measured.
- 04/12/2009 10:37:10 PM
1350 Views
But does it make any difference in the objective value of the book?
- 06/12/2009 09:35:59 AM
1507 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
- 04/12/2009 10:25:08 PM
1384 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
- 06/12/2009 09:36:11 AM
1372 Views
I've obviously missed the show here...
- 04/12/2009 12:14:30 AM
1321 Views
I'm not sure that's right. This thing just keeps growing.
- 04/12/2009 12:46:24 AM
1440 Views
What, your penis?
- 06/12/2009 02:40:09 AM
1381 Views
Don't you know it!
- 06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM
1243 Views
- 06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM
1243 Views
You talk the talk, that's for sure.
- 07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM
1396 Views
- 07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM
1396 Views
Metaphor versus literalism
- 04/12/2009 05:42:03 PM
1412 Views
Metaphor divorced from the reality runs risks, however.
- 04/12/2009 10:25:47 PM
1318 Views
Honestly, the moral can always be dismissed as inapplicable if you want to dismiss it.
- 05/12/2009 12:16:39 AM
1327 Views
While that's true, it's much harder to just dismiss Mockingbird.
- 05/12/2009 03:57:42 AM
1314 Views
Then why read fiction at all? It's all a diversion.
- 05/12/2009 04:16:06 PM
1327 Views
I think people should read non-fiction, and The Nine Hundred Days is an excellent book.
- 05/12/2009 04:41:50 PM
1379 Views
aha. but.
- 07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM
1552 Views
