Active Users:976 Time:18/10/2026 11:08:01 AM
I have to agree LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM
My last two years of high school, I was in AP English classes (one composition focused and the other literature focused) and our teacher never ever allowed us to analyze anything nearing an "Adventure" book. The only reason I pulled off doing an analysis of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea is because I made the argument that it was considered a classic and I wasn't planning on taking the AP test that year (it was the literature-based exam) and even if I was it was on the recommended reading list. And she was not happy about it and I really think the only reason she let me do it is she knew I'd pull a decent paper out of it. And then she made us spend a month analyzing Beloved . I think she was punishing me.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1883 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1404 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1472 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1475 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 1327 Views
Are you nuts!!?? - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1616 Views
I wanted to do that too. - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 1254 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 621 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1433 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 1370 Views
I agree. - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 1316 Views
I disagree slightly - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 1307 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 1368 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1404 Views
You poopyhead! - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1481 Views
Oh, I almost forgot - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 1328 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 544 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1429 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 1285 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 1298 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 1221 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1593 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1425 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 1499 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 1208 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1549 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 1412 Views
In which case... - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 1180 Views
Yes - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1462 Views
Not really. - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1631 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1550 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1419 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1446 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 1373 Views
Heh. - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 1280 Views
I'd laugh... - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 1145 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 1199 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 581 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 1390 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1508 Views
It's frustrating though... - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1438 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1459 Views
Perhaps. - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 1152 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 1216 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 1310 Views
You're not. - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 1258 Views
Her next series sounds interesting - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 1152 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 1192 Views
Yes, but how so? - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 1278 Views
Well... - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 1359 Views
Honestly... - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 1354 Views
Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1496 Views
Re: Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 1357 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 1153 Views
'tis. - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1516 Views
I really don't think it would. - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 1346 Views
I have tried before. - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 1241 Views
That's bullshit - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 1386 Views
True, true. - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 1109 Views
Luckily for you... - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1493 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1593 Views
Har. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 736 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 1370 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 1270 Views
I have to agree - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 1384 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 556 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 1251 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 1190 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 694 Views

Reply to Message