Active Users:933 Time:15/09/2026 11:31:01 PM
Larry Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 06:06:23 AM
You're quite right. I thought consensus was that the book isn't really all that well written but I've just shown through my responses here that obviously that upsets some people. Hence, the consensus is not total... :P



And I guess having a negative opinion of the book's merits is enough to somehow deter scads of potential posters? ;)
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas - Book Club now open! - 25/01/2010 10:54:37 PM 2910 Views
Le plot. - 25/01/2010 10:55:26 PM 1661 Views
Plot: demarcation, plan, complot... - 26/01/2010 11:48:19 PM 1841 Views
Les characters. - 25/01/2010 10:56:23 PM 1760 Views
The good, the bad and the ugly. - 26/01/2010 10:54:38 AM 1787 Views
Hmm. - 27/01/2010 03:58:31 PM 1719 Views
Re: Hmm. - 27/01/2010 04:59:12 PM 1760 Views
Re: Hmm. - 28/01/2010 01:40:34 PM 1699 Views
Re: Hmm. - 01/02/2010 12:49:06 PM 1928 Views
Why does the book have enduring appeal? - 25/01/2010 10:57:37 PM 1734 Views
Or rather, does this book share any traits in common with pornography? - 25/01/2010 11:14:01 PM 1881 Views
I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak. - 26/01/2010 03:43:04 AM 1787 Views
Re: I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak. - 26/01/2010 11:12:19 AM 1814 Views
In that case, the "release" is quite unsatisfying. - 27/01/2010 01:42:28 PM 1968 Views
Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting - 27/01/2010 02:06:58 PM 1840 Views
Oh, and your point on revenge - that's just reading too much into the text. - 27/01/2010 02:16:05 PM 1672 Views
There is no such thing - 27/01/2010 02:18:46 PM 1714 Views
I fundamentally disagree with your post-modern take on the novel. - 27/01/2010 02:25:25 PM 1783 Views
It isn't a postmodern take on it - 27/01/2010 02:41:32 PM 1734 Views
Re: Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting - 27/01/2010 03:40:36 PM 1729 Views
Maybe it's of the same importance as the Lost Symbol. - 27/01/2010 03:44:55 PM 1783 Views
If I ddin't know better, I might think you a trifle petulant - 27/01/2010 04:19:57 PM 1819 Views
I'm never petulant - 27/01/2010 04:55:56 PM 1660 Views
Re: Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting - 27/01/2010 04:47:37 PM 1838 Views
I think one important question to ask is... - 26/01/2010 12:00:17 AM 1814 Views
I have read the abridged version a couple of times. I am reading the unabridged version this time. - 26/01/2010 03:25:50 AM 1776 Views
the potentially removable part... - 26/01/2010 11:24:16 AM 1802 Views
I have read both - 27/01/2010 01:37:00 AM 1828 Views
The abridged versus the unabridged - 28/01/2010 06:32:22 AM 1767 Views
Re: Why does the book have enduring appeal? - 27/01/2010 01:16:47 AM 1927 Views
Re: Why does the book have enduring appeal? - 30/01/2010 09:12:22 AM 1785 Views
Re: I got here too late, so I offer Umberto Eco's thoughts on the matter: - 22/02/2010 06:59:13 PM 1974 Views
I'm watching right back, Big Brother. *NM* - 25/01/2010 11:44:30 PM 917 Views
*NM* - 25/01/2010 11:45:27 PM 902 Views
The book was very childish. - 26/01/2010 03:05:01 AM 1907 Views
Granted, The Master and Margarita is also very much a fantasy book. *NM* - 26/01/2010 03:07:45 AM 948 Views
No, it really isn't. - 26/01/2010 03:10:08 AM 1797 Views
You know, this is a problem. - 26/01/2010 03:43:14 AM 1804 Views
There's really nothing I can say to this that Greg didn't just say above. - 26/01/2010 06:32:02 AM 1874 Views
People tend to forget one thing about Tolkien - 26/01/2010 01:36:06 PM 1738 Views
Re: No, it really isn't. - 26/01/2010 10:57:19 AM 1733 Views
I'll admit the only Lem I've read is Solaris... - 26/01/2010 01:52:02 PM 1840 Views
Read His Master's Voice - 26/01/2010 04:52:31 PM 1727 Views
You make some rather odd claims here, Tom - 27/01/2010 12:43:41 AM 1830 Views
You place undue importance on academic degrees. - 27/01/2010 01:19:40 AM 1820 Views
You misread totally what I said, I see... - 27/01/2010 01:52:59 AM 1703 Views
My claims are far from odd. In fact, they're quite common. - 27/01/2010 01:57:41 AM 1794 Views
In some circles; in others, they're rather antiquated nowadays - 27/01/2010 02:21:03 AM 1733 Views
If you were trying to write literature, wouldn't the label sting for you? - 27/01/2010 01:25:14 PM 1750 Views
I think it's easier to think of stories fitting into genre(s) than to think the same of authors - 27/01/2010 02:40:29 PM 1847 Views
Allow me to clarify: I'm talking about authors' reactions to their books being so labelled. - 27/01/2010 03:08:47 PM 1874 Views
But yet their reactions vary widely - 27/01/2010 11:33:25 PM 1747 Views
My fundamental premise is that genre has the most utility when applied to derivative fiction. - 28/01/2010 09:39:17 PM 1754 Views
And yet that term is mostly used as a non-loaded term that doesn't attempt to ascribe quality levels - 29/01/2010 02:49:20 AM 1670 Views
I like my definition of science fiction better than the one you quoted. - 29/01/2010 05:16:36 AM 1722 Views
I think estrangement is a key element, though - 30/01/2010 11:00:19 PM 1745 Views
I don't think estrangement is a necessary element. - 30/01/2010 11:47:07 PM 1846 Views
I mean it as a literary effect, that of creating a distance between text and reader - 31/01/2010 12:03:34 AM 1730 Views
Even if that's the meaning, I still disagree. - 03/02/2010 12:49:58 AM 1677 Views
Depends on how you view SF, I suppose - 03/02/2010 04:20:56 AM 1521 Views
I thought that was what we were mulling over - 03/02/2010 04:38:35 AM 1707 Views
True - 03/02/2010 05:11:19 AM 1638 Views
Nice tie-in! - 03/02/2010 01:55:33 PM 1715 Views
- 05/02/2010 06:06:23 AM 1755 Views
The approve of this message. - 26/01/2010 03:34:49 AM 1791 Views
I'm not through it quite yet, but I do have a question - 26/01/2010 12:24:14 PM 1705 Views
Wait...you VOTED for this book? - 26/01/2010 01:41:00 PM 1753 Views
I honestly can't remember. - 26/01/2010 01:55:39 PM 1707 Views
Doctor Zhivago is one of the best novels ever written. - 26/01/2010 02:12:35 PM 1759 Views
Right, so now we all know that if we'd just listen to me more often, the world would be better. - 26/01/2010 02:20:56 PM 1714 Views
The problem was that the suggestions were generally not that good. - 26/01/2010 02:32:50 PM 1784 Views
Possession is not "purely a romance novel". - 26/01/2010 02:57:17 PM 1909 Views
Which basically proves my entire point. - 26/01/2010 03:00:20 PM 1781 Views
Which is purely a romance novel? - 26/01/2010 02:59:38 PM 1783 Views
Fair enough, it might be a bit tricky to discuss. *NM* - 26/01/2010 03:04:58 PM 905 Views
In your opinion - 26/01/2010 03:07:12 PM 1799 Views
Exactly why I avoid suggesting modern books - 26/01/2010 03:10:09 PM 1803 Views
You really are ignornant of what A.S. Byatt writes, aren't you? - 27/01/2010 12:51:00 AM 1772 Views
Oh, I fucking hate epistolary novels. Thank you for warning me. - 27/01/2010 02:00:34 AM 1654 Views
Ha! - 27/01/2010 02:22:00 AM 1726 Views
Perhaps I would like it. I still hate epistolary novels. - 27/01/2010 01:26:43 PM 1778 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 26/01/2010 02:01:22 PM 896 Views
It's funny because I think it's a question of taste level. - 26/01/2010 02:32:08 PM 1819 Views
Curious George is a tale of many layers, as told by Werner Herzog - 26/01/2010 02:34:27 PM 1884 Views
I don't care if this validates your opinion of me. - 29/01/2010 11:06:18 PM 1656 Views
On what basis? - 26/01/2010 02:51:40 PM 1800 Views
It's a children's book. Get over it. Democracy failed. - 26/01/2010 02:55:03 PM 1830 Views
Usually does, when those who know better keep silent. - 26/01/2010 02:57:54 PM 1736 Views
I didn't keep silent, though. - 26/01/2010 04:46:48 PM 1801 Views
You're ignoring what we've been discussing. - 27/01/2010 11:11:44 AM 1745 Views
Regarding comfort zones - 26/01/2010 05:08:50 PM 1830 Views
Camilla, let's be honest here... - 26/01/2010 05:40:08 PM 1873 Views
Re: Camilla, let's be honest here... - 26/01/2010 09:10:47 PM 1855 Views
If that's your goal, Camilla, you failed. - 27/01/2010 01:35:52 PM 1884 Views
Possibly - 27/01/2010 01:38:39 PM 1716 Views
I have not been ranting and raving. I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification. - 27/01/2010 01:45:05 PM 1752 Views
Re: I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification. - 27/01/2010 01:53:28 PM 1716 Views
I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg. - 27/01/2010 02:26:12 PM 1878 Views
Don't you get it? We bring this place down. - 27/01/2010 02:42:32 PM 1718 Views
Re: I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg. - 27/01/2010 02:43:11 PM 1726 Views
While that was not the intent, that is an added bonus. - 27/01/2010 02:48:47 PM 1719 Views
why is it a bonus? - 27/01/2010 02:52:58 PM 1680 Views
I said see above. You should have before the thought police, Rebekah, started to delete. - 27/01/2010 02:59:07 PM 1971 Views
I did - 27/01/2010 04:40:25 PM 1739 Views
Re: Regarding comfort zones - 27/01/2010 11:57:03 AM 1833 Views
Re: Regarding comfort zones - 27/01/2010 11:59:31 AM 1784 Views
Halfway - 27/01/2010 12:07:14 PM 1714 Views
Re: Halfway - 27/01/2010 12:09:02 PM 1742 Views
Re: The book was very childish. - 30/01/2010 09:56:29 PM 1748 Views
I read it in French - 30/01/2010 10:54:34 PM 1642 Views
So. I really liked it. - 26/01/2010 08:57:02 AM 1915 Views
Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand. - 26/01/2010 11:04:23 PM 1714 Views
Re: Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand. - 26/01/2010 11:49:03 PM 1775 Views
We were talking about this last night. - 27/01/2010 11:14:21 AM 1850 Views
Re: We were talking about this last night. - 27/01/2010 11:37:04 AM 1890 Views
If you do that, I'm posting on the deeper meaning of Dan Brown. - 27/01/2010 01:46:35 PM 1831 Views
Feel free to. - 27/01/2010 01:51:23 PM 1816 Views
Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit. - 27/01/2010 02:28:56 PM 1738 Views
Re: Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit. - 27/01/2010 02:45:41 PM 1829 Views
I'm not setting up a straw man. I'm challenging your touchy-feely approach. - 27/01/2010 03:15:00 PM 1662 Views
My touchy-feely approach? - 27/01/2010 05:09:04 PM 1759 Views
Yes...using passing references in the text to justify a deeper analysis. - 27/01/2010 05:16:10 PM 1743 Views
Doesn't touchy-feely mean that it is steeped in or based on emotion? - 27/01/2010 06:40:31 PM 1747 Views
I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here. - 27/01/2010 07:01:08 PM 1692 Views
You summed up my reasons for using "touchy-feely" quite well. - 27/01/2010 07:27:45 PM 1737 Views
Glad to hear it. - 27/01/2010 07:39:20 PM 1588 Views
Re: I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here. - 27/01/2010 08:29:32 PM 1775 Views
See my reply to Tom for clarification, then. - 27/01/2010 08:57:18 PM 1849 Views
Re: See my reply to Tom for clarification, then. - 27/01/2010 09:09:47 PM 1747 Views
Well, so what will it be? - 27/01/2010 09:14:53 PM 1677 Views
Er. Whose position are you arguing - mine or yours? - 27/01/2010 10:33:01 PM 1634 Views
Do it. I'd read that. - 27/01/2010 01:55:23 PM 1869 Views
Re: Do it. I'd read that. - 27/01/2010 02:10:04 PM 1761 Views
Right then. - 27/01/2010 02:15:04 PM 1711 Views
All righty, that's enough of that. For Tom, Greg, and... no, pretty much just you two. - 27/01/2010 04:33:00 PM 1804 Views
And ANOTHER THING - 27/01/2010 05:05:17 PM 1637 Views
Not everyone has finished reading it yet *NM* - 27/01/2010 05:12:10 PM 988 Views
Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing. - 27/01/2010 05:17:51 PM 1802 Views
Re: Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing. - 27/01/2010 06:41:11 PM 1792 Views
We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults. - 27/01/2010 07:30:49 PM 1695 Views
In the interest of discussing Dumas' intentions... - 27/01/2010 08:03:24 PM 1853 Views
It was mildly interesting. - 27/01/2010 09:04:03 PM 1793 Views
I think you're misreading that... - 27/01/2010 10:18:11 PM 1836 Views
Re: We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults. - 27/01/2010 08:30:19 PM 1827 Views
The text doesn't warrant "close attention" any more than Dan Brown's works do. - 27/01/2010 09:10:45 PM 1706 Views
fine. *NM* - 27/01/2010 09:12:44 PM 911 Views
Also, do you think a good book would have generated this level of discussion? Of course not. - 27/01/2010 05:21:45 PM 1745 Views
What discussion? - 27/01/2010 06:42:32 PM 1742 Views
I said that we couldn't discuss the book on its own terms. - 27/01/2010 07:35:32 PM 1877 Views
Which I still think we can. - 27/01/2010 08:35:35 PM 1724 Views
Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all. - 27/01/2010 09:06:59 PM 1799 Views
Re: Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all. - 27/01/2010 09:12:22 PM 1755 Views
You have yet to show any utility for breaking things down. - 27/01/2010 09:19:29 PM 1888 Views
I haven't tried to show any "utility" for it. - 01/02/2010 01:06:35 PM 1686 Views
I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on. - 27/01/2010 10:40:36 PM 1742 Views
Re: I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on. - 01/02/2010 12:56:03 PM 1696 Views
Deary me. - 27/01/2010 05:19:58 PM 1944 Views
By "respect" do you mean that you want me to drop my debates? - 27/01/2010 05:24:03 PM 1701 Views
Not at all. - 27/01/2010 05:35:34 PM 1859 Views
Okay, I'm cool with that. - 27/01/2010 05:44:54 PM 1840 Views
Thank you. - 27/01/2010 05:48:05 PM 2439 Views
Please ban me, then. - 27/01/2010 06:44:55 PM 1673 Views
Nods - 18/02/2010 05:06:44 PM 2186 Views
Oh man, I love this thread. *NM* - 28/01/2010 01:17:58 AM 885 Views
On the nature of the "Book Club" - 28/01/2010 09:23:23 PM 1612 Views
Any chance of seeing some shorter suggestions? - 28/01/2010 10:20:59 PM 1853 Views
Yes, shorter would be good. - 28/01/2010 10:23:28 PM 1677 Views
Oh i'm not complaining - 28/01/2010 10:33:48 PM 1695 Views
Sure sounded like it. - 28/01/2010 10:38:27 PM 1731 Views
No for reals, shorter is good. - 29/01/2010 01:08:26 AM 1726 Views
Absolutely. - 29/01/2010 03:33:15 AM 1666 Views
Agreed - 29/01/2010 11:26:34 AM 1710 Views
Well, you should have known better! - 29/01/2010 01:29:40 AM 1711 Views
I do. - 29/01/2010 08:31:30 PM 1706 Views
Thought you did - 29/01/2010 08:38:39 PM 1668 Views
- 29/01/2010 08:51:42 PM 1710 Views
All I can say is The Master and Margarita better be one by March. WE WAS ROBBED. *NM* - 29/01/2010 02:31:48 AM 876 Views
That is the other one that I am considering. *NM* - 29/01/2010 03:32:02 AM 902 Views
I'll re-read Zhivago or Master if either is chosen - 29/01/2010 05:26:02 AM 1682 Views
Talk to me Ghavrel. - 30/01/2010 12:09:24 AM 1656 Views
Well, I haven't finished it yet. - 30/01/2010 02:21:08 AM 1698 Views
Re: On the nature of the "Book Club" - 29/01/2010 12:33:03 PM 1651 Views
I didn't read it for the Book Club - 29/01/2010 12:40:22 AM 1695 Views
Well I'm late to the party - 29/01/2010 06:21:18 AM 1689 Views
No, you're early - 01/02/2010 01:26:10 PM 1617 Views
I still have yet to see that discussion, Camilla. *NM* - 03/02/2010 12:46:24 AM 938 Views
A few comments - 04/02/2010 06:39:18 AM 1981 Views
If I kept you from participating, that's your fault. - 04/02/2010 01:01:46 PM 1658 Views
An interesting quote from the book - does it jibe with your experience? - 29/01/2010 11:23:54 PM 1711 Views
Sure. - 01/02/2010 03:23:59 PM 1688 Views

Reply to Message