Active Users:1830 Time:22/09/2026 06:26:37 AM
mostly agree snoopcester Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 11:18:14 PM
With regard to the rest, I think Snoop's comment on the American revolutionaries being traitors was largely tongue in cheek, and you have a point in saying he'd be inconsistent if he were serious. But the others also have a point in insisting that determining when a revolution becomes justified is a subjective matter. There isn't some set objective moment at which revolution becomes morally just.


They were traitors to the Crown - they did rebel against their king which does make them traitors. Of course they won which changes things a lot;)
But it was really just an illustration of the point that it is subjective, it isn't like saying murder it wrong but rather than saying murder is wrong unless you think they have a bad haircut or ugly shoes in which case it is noble and good.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Subversive Websites - 13/11/2010 10:49:15 PM 1492 Views
"Intended or serving to subvert, especially intended to overthrow or undermine an established govt". - 14/11/2010 01:44:14 AM 876 Views
Re: Gee, thanks dad! *NM* - 14/11/2010 01:32:32 PM 550 Views
Well, I'm hoping I simply disagree with your diction rather than your motives. - 14/11/2010 03:36:57 PM 930 Views
Re: No, you disagree with my motives. - 15/11/2010 01:06:54 AM 896 Views
The Founding Fathers of the US? - 15/11/2010 10:18:32 AM 949 Views
"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God". - 15/11/2010 01:15:33 PM 978 Views
I'm sure bin Laden completely agrees - 15/11/2010 01:32:53 PM 949 Views
When you give me an example of Jefferson murdering women and children that analogy will work. - 15/11/2010 01:49:04 PM 904 Views
yes because Jefferson was a PARAGON of virtue himself - 15/11/2010 02:17:58 PM 1000 Views
I wasn't aware I'd made that statement. - 15/11/2010 02:25:27 PM 823 Views
nvm, I was going to argue but I have decided not to *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:46:42 PM 509 Views
So you are being completely subjective here? It is wrong, unless it is for a cause you support? *NM* - 15/11/2010 02:30:37 PM 429 Views
No, it's a question of precedence. - 15/11/2010 04:13:04 PM 826 Views
His analogy works very well, and you are still being subjective. - 15/11/2010 08:23:25 PM 1076 Views
The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 09:17:01 PM 1094 Views
Re: The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 10:52:40 PM 869 Views
I don't believe that at all. - 16/11/2010 12:08:26 AM 710 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 16/11/2010 11:52:36 PM 973 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 17/11/2010 01:34:29 AM 956 Views
No, its relevancy is difficult to grasp. - 16/11/2010 07:19:11 AM 1202 Views
Maybe I just have an unusual perspective. - 16/11/2010 04:15:39 PM 989 Views
I didn't know they bombed a SCHOOL!!! - 16/11/2010 04:31:24 PM 875 Views
Please. If there were any soldiers in the WTC on 911 it was coincidental. - 16/11/2010 04:40:51 PM 867 Views
perhaps, but not all important targets are military targets. - 16/11/2010 04:57:20 PM 1051 Views
Not all important targets are LEGITIMATE targets either. - 16/11/2010 05:06:11 PM 883 Views
I don't wish one, but I hate sidebars - 16/11/2010 05:09:33 PM 934 Views
All about priorities; your call. - 16/11/2010 10:33:53 PM 851 Views
That's so many hours of my life I'll never get back. - 16/11/2010 10:41:55 PM 861 Views
This your first time on the CMB? - 16/11/2010 11:18:03 PM 897 Views
No, NOW I know what's going on! - 16/11/2010 04:36:04 PM 1018 Views
Still doesn't work. - 16/11/2010 04:50:58 PM 1041 Views
Those last sentences are going way overboard. - 16/11/2010 05:08:40 PM 881 Views
Terrorism is inexcusable and indefensible, but at least there's a LOGIC to it. - 16/11/2010 05:21:15 PM 965 Views
First of all, your generalizations were misguided. - 16/11/2010 05:40:55 PM 991 Views
Of course I disagree, but that's a different and older debate. - 16/11/2010 11:10:23 PM 1154 Views
I will try to be brief. Try. - 16/11/2010 11:28:28 PM 968 Views
Heh. - 16/11/2010 11:55:40 PM 848 Views
mostly agree - 16/11/2010 11:18:14 PM 829 Views
. . . and now I'm thinking you're the one willfully misunderstanding. - 16/11/2010 05:36:15 PM 885 Views
Not willful, at least. - 17/11/2010 12:29:42 AM 835 Views
sorry - 16/11/2010 11:24:44 PM 940 Views
Well, you know what I was going on about, if that helps? *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:25:18 PM 507 Views
"Subversion" has the connotation of treason, however wrongly. - 15/11/2010 01:32:06 PM 949 Views
Re: Non-sequitur, non-sequitur, CAPS LOCK, opinion, CAPS LOCK. - 15/11/2010 10:45:41 PM 764 Views
Either my mind moves much faster than ya'lls, or ya'll are deliberately missing the point. - 16/11/2010 12:05:28 AM 976 Views
I am curious. - 16/11/2010 01:10:52 AM 827 Views
Argggh, ya got me! - 16/11/2010 05:11:41 PM 814 Views
the dictionary has -nia and -iums. - 16/11/2010 05:16:32 PM 912 Views
I prefer "millennia" but recall someone telling me that's not technically right. - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 867 Views
well, in American English, they're apparantly both "correct" *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:13:40 PM 543 Views
In American English, almost anything is. - 17/11/2010 01:02:15 AM 930 Views
It is right. It's the one thing that's easy in Latin and Greek declensions. - 16/11/2010 06:33:12 PM 861 Views
You call then "neutral" over there? Interesting. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:42:00 PM 535 Views
Neutral, neutrum, neuter, whatever. Details. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:45:29 PM 487 Views
Do only neuter words end in -um? - 16/11/2010 06:57:39 PM 930 Views
Yes. I think so, anyway - been a good while since I had Latin. - 16/11/2010 07:12:09 PM 921 Views
Thanks. Maybe that's what I'm remembering. - 16/11/2010 07:17:05 PM 909 Views
IIRC, the number of "n"s was the issue. - 17/11/2010 01:06:24 AM 903 Views
Should definitely be two. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:48:51 AM 448 Views
Ah, thanks. - 17/11/2010 02:08:08 AM 900 Views
Silly laptops.... - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 998 Views
- 16/11/2010 05:35:22 PM 812 Views
I'm horrible about using "conjugate" as a blanket term. - 17/11/2010 01:09:34 AM 963 Views
I'm definitely missing the point. - 16/11/2010 06:58:17 AM 903 Views
Well, hopefully we've cleared things up now. *MN* - 16/11/2010 05:30:46 PM 920 Views
I don't know if it qualifies as subversive... - 14/11/2010 02:47:34 AM 1025 Views
Re: That's not bad. - 14/11/2010 01:38:02 PM 922 Views
The Chap - 14/11/2010 01:58:27 PM 812 Views
Thanks. - 14/11/2010 03:04:49 PM 887 Views
All my subversive websites are religious. - 15/11/2010 02:26:42 AM 890 Views
Re: I'm certainly interested. - 15/11/2010 03:37:11 AM 892 Views
Well, okay then. - 15/11/2010 04:23:35 AM 956 Views
Some stuff I think is pretty neat: - 15/11/2010 07:24:41 PM 971 Views
Re: Noice, noice. - 15/11/2010 11:01:31 PM 905 Views
That first link is really good. - 15/11/2010 11:18:25 PM 1013 Views
Re: Ha! - 16/11/2010 11:55:42 PM 764 Views
Re: Also, I like your poems. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:02:27 AM 479 Views
Re: Dude. - 20/11/2010 02:14:38 AM 974 Views
you mean besides this one? *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:55:03 PM 381 Views
Re: I AM NOT SUBVERTING NEBHEAD!! - 15/11/2010 11:02:10 PM 892 Views
Re: William Faulkner would be unhappy with my thread. - 16/11/2010 08:29:42 PM 883 Views
My work here is done. - 16/11/2010 08:34:22 PM 840 Views
Re: Yes, it's fairly obvious that you need to respond. *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:40:10 PM 501 Views
I often wish I didn't. - 17/11/2010 01:49:33 AM 792 Views
I'm calling you out on this one. - 18/11/2010 12:06:17 AM 851 Views
It's not perfect, but it's the lesser of many evils, IMHO. - 18/11/2010 01:12:43 AM 913 Views
You people with your words. - 16/11/2010 08:34:17 PM 978 Views
. - 16/11/2010 08:54:22 PM 764 Views
Re: I still say we should start a band. - 20/11/2010 02:42:48 AM 937 Views
Re: Man, that attack on Cameron is brutal. *NM* - 20/11/2010 02:47:12 AM 461 Views
Re: Awesome. - 16/11/2010 11:38:29 PM 889 Views

Reply to Message