On Israel and Palestine: first of all, I do think you mean Camp David and not Oslo, because Oslo didn't really go into much detail on the issues that matter, whereas Camp David did. And the Palestinians really could ask for more - and were under heavy pressure to do so. The right of return has been perhaps the most difficult issue - arguably, as there are so many difficult issues - preventing peace between Israel and the Palestinians, from the very first peace negotiations in 1949 onwards. Israel offered to let 100,000 Palestinians return at Camp David. Now, you and I may agree with them that they could not seriously have gone all that much higher - at least not orders of magnitude higher, as the Palestinians wanted. But since the Arabs and the Palestinians have kept insisting on that right of return for the past sixty years, for all of them, it IS understandable that the Palestinians wanted more, and hoped to get more. Foolish, but understandable. And I repeat my basic point: you may think the Palestinians turned down the best offer they were gonna get, and I may think that, but that doesn't make it an objective fact, and it doesn't mean their insistence to carry on fighting after that makes them somehow "worse than terrorists". They were not offered "their stated goals" by a long shot, and so the question of whether or not what they were offered was enough, is a subjective call.
Yeah, it really, really, really isn't like that elsewhere.
I don't know what it's like elsewhere, but that remains a common topic of conversation in America, the country whose third President once looked forward to a revolution every four years. It probably always has been and probably always will be; "hunting clubs" aside, that's the reason the Second Amendment was written and remains part of the nations highest law. It's also why I want to be very careful of what I say and what I support, not just because of a pervasive and often paranoid intelligence community, but because the issue of whether rebellion is an urgent patriotic duty remains quite relevant to many Americans. I've no interest in a rebellion, and hence no interest in encouraging one, inadvertently or otherwise. We're still a long way from being unable to fix the system from within, IMHO, and I want to avoid any risk of implying otherwise.
Yeah, it really, really, really isn't like that elsewhere.
Subversive Websites
- 13/11/2010 10:49:15 PM
1347 Views
"Intended or serving to subvert, especially intended to overthrow or undermine an established govt".
- 14/11/2010 01:44:14 AM
734 Views
Re: Gee, thanks dad! *NM*
- 14/11/2010 01:32:32 PM
501 Views
Well, I'm hoping I simply disagree with your diction rather than your motives.
- 14/11/2010 03:36:57 PM
798 Views
Re: No, you disagree with my motives.
- 15/11/2010 01:06:54 AM
783 Views
Jesus, who was executed for treason, is another relatively famous subversive. *NM*
- 15/11/2010 01:43:22 AM
426 Views
Re: I believe I've heard of him. Played centerfield for the Braves? *NM*
- 15/11/2010 03:38:17 AM
439 Views
The Founding Fathers of the US?
- 15/11/2010 10:18:32 AM
816 Views
"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God".
- 15/11/2010 01:15:33 PM
851 Views
I'm sure bin Laden completely agrees
- 15/11/2010 01:32:53 PM
826 Views
- 15/11/2010 01:32:53 PM
826 Views
When you give me an example of Jefferson murdering women and children that analogy will work.
- 15/11/2010 01:49:04 PM
765 Views
- 15/11/2010 01:49:04 PM
765 Views
yes because Jefferson was a PARAGON of virtue himself
- 15/11/2010 02:17:58 PM
862 Views
- 15/11/2010 02:17:58 PM
862 Views
So you are being completely subjective here? It is wrong, unless it is for a cause you support? *NM*
- 15/11/2010 02:30:37 PM
385 Views
No, it's a question of precedence.
- 15/11/2010 04:13:04 PM
708 Views
government as a social contract is an opinion.
- 15/11/2010 07:47:57 PM
769 Views
Government as social contract is accepted everywhere political power doesn't come out of a gun.
- 15/11/2010 09:26:19 PM
900 Views
His analogy works very well, and you are still being subjective.
- 15/11/2010 08:23:25 PM
946 Views
The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point.
- 15/11/2010 09:17:01 PM
908 Views
Re: The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point.
- 15/11/2010 10:52:40 PM
726 Views
I don't believe that at all.
- 16/11/2010 12:08:26 AM
606 Views
I'm sorry, at what point did he say he wished to overturn social contract philosophy?
- 16/11/2010 01:47:49 AM
719 Views
Heaven forbid anyone put words in peoples mouths.
- 16/11/2010 04:38:20 PM
924 Views
uhm, he did not say every rebel is a traitor.
- 16/11/2010 04:49:23 PM
685 Views
Re: uhm, which "he" are we speaking of here?
- 16/11/2010 04:58:12 PM
906 Views
dude, so your issue is that you're afraid the CIA is going to show up on your door?
- 16/11/2010 05:01:38 PM
832 Views
My issue is not inviting trouble just to impotently shake my fist at omnipotent but faceless evil.
- 16/11/2010 10:31:54 PM
6021 Views
They also don't get paid to waste their superiors time with silly conversations on silly websites *NM*
- 18/11/2010 10:56:36 AM
512 Views
The US had a guy tortured in Syria for a year because of silly converse on a silly website.
- 18/11/2010 04:03:14 PM
749 Views
No, its relevancy is difficult to grasp.
- 16/11/2010 07:19:11 AM
960 Views
Maybe I just have an unusual perspective.
- 16/11/2010 04:15:39 PM
864 Views
I didn't know they bombed a SCHOOL!!!
- 16/11/2010 04:31:24 PM
742 Views
Please. If there were any soldiers in the WTC on 911 it was coincidental.
- 16/11/2010 04:40:51 PM
763 Views
perhaps, but not all important targets are military targets.
- 16/11/2010 04:57:20 PM
915 Views
Not all important targets are LEGITIMATE targets either.
- 16/11/2010 05:06:11 PM
737 Views
I don't wish one, but I hate sidebars
- 16/11/2010 05:09:33 PM
793 Views
- 16/11/2010 05:09:33 PM
793 Views
All about priorities; your call.
- 16/11/2010 10:33:53 PM
706 Views
No, NOW I know what's going on!
- 16/11/2010 04:36:04 PM
890 Views
Still doesn't work.
- 16/11/2010 04:50:58 PM
908 Views
Those last sentences are going way overboard.
- 16/11/2010 05:08:40 PM
737 Views
Terrorism is inexcusable and indefensible, but at least there's a LOGIC to it.
- 16/11/2010 05:21:15 PM
830 Views
First of all, your generalizations were misguided.
- 16/11/2010 05:40:55 PM
845 Views
Of course I disagree, but that's a different and older debate.
- 16/11/2010 11:10:23 PM
1015 Views
- 16/11/2010 11:10:23 PM
1015 Views
I will try to be brief. Try.
- 16/11/2010 11:28:28 PM
819 Views
- 16/11/2010 11:28:28 PM
819 Views
mostly agree
- 16/11/2010 11:18:14 PM
695 Views
"Treason never prospers, what's the reason? If it prospers, none dare call it treason".
- 16/11/2010 11:30:55 PM
781 Views
I agree with the title - that seems to be a good quote to define when treason stops becoming treason
- 16/11/2010 11:39:37 PM
780 Views
. . . and now I'm thinking you're the one willfully misunderstanding.
- 16/11/2010 05:36:15 PM
769 Views
sorry
- 16/11/2010 11:24:44 PM
797 Views
Equally sorry if I've somehow done SOME Islamic TERRORISTS a disservice.
- 17/11/2010 12:44:34 AM
815 Views
- 17/11/2010 12:44:34 AM
815 Views
"Subversion" has the connotation of treason, however wrongly.
- 15/11/2010 01:32:06 PM
823 Views
Re: Non-sequitur, non-sequitur, CAPS LOCK, opinion, CAPS LOCK.
- 15/11/2010 10:45:41 PM
638 Views
Either my mind moves much faster than ya'lls, or ya'll are deliberately missing the point.
- 16/11/2010 12:05:28 AM
841 Views
I am curious.
- 16/11/2010 01:10:52 AM
683 Views
Argggh, ya got me!
- 16/11/2010 05:11:41 PM
684 Views
- 16/11/2010 05:11:41 PM
684 Views
the dictionary has -nia and -iums.
- 16/11/2010 05:16:32 PM
785 Views
I prefer "millennia" but recall someone telling me that's not technically right.
- 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM
728 Views
well, in American English, they're apparantly both "correct" *NM*
- 16/11/2010 06:13:40 PM
491 Views
It is right. It's the one thing that's easy in Latin and Greek declensions.
- 16/11/2010 06:33:12 PM
736 Views
Do only neuter words end in -um?
- 16/11/2010 06:57:39 PM
805 Views
IIRC, the number of "n"s was the issue.
- 17/11/2010 01:06:24 AM
777 Views
Oh yes, because you're very much in danger!!!
- 16/11/2010 01:51:58 AM
668 Views
The Secret Service once tracked down a teenager who wrote a death threat on a bill he passed.
- 16/11/2010 05:30:18 PM
780 Views
All my subversive websites are religious.
- 15/11/2010 02:26:42 AM
745 Views
Re: I'm certainly interested.
- 15/11/2010 03:37:11 AM
765 Views
Well, okay then.
- 15/11/2010 04:23:35 AM
835 Views
- 15/11/2010 04:23:35 AM
835 Views
Always liked Sojourners, though I've not been by there in an Age.
- 15/11/2010 01:43:51 PM
797 Views
Some stuff I think is pretty neat:
- 15/11/2010 07:24:41 PM
851 Views
Re: William Faulkner would be unhappy with my thread.
- 16/11/2010 08:29:42 PM
743 Views
My work here is done.
- 16/11/2010 08:34:22 PM
711 Views
- 16/11/2010 08:34:22 PM
711 Views
Re: Yes, it's fairly obvious that you need to respond. *NM*
- 16/11/2010 11:40:10 PM
458 Views
I often wish I didn't.
- 17/11/2010 01:49:33 AM
667 Views

