Active Users:550 Time:13/06/2026 06:19:10 AM
IIRC, the number of "n"s was the issue. Joel Send a noteboard - 17/11/2010 01:06:24 AM
All neutral words, such as those ending in -um, have a plural on -a in the nominative and accusative. In Latin and in Greek.

However, if my recollection of the conversation were vivid we wouldn't be having this one. ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Subversive Websites - 13/11/2010 10:49:15 PM 1438 Views
"Intended or serving to subvert, especially intended to overthrow or undermine an established govt". - 14/11/2010 01:44:14 AM 821 Views
Re: Gee, thanks dad! *NM* - 14/11/2010 01:32:32 PM 527 Views
Well, I'm hoping I simply disagree with your diction rather than your motives. - 14/11/2010 03:36:57 PM 878 Views
Re: No, you disagree with my motives. - 15/11/2010 01:06:54 AM 847 Views
The Founding Fathers of the US? - 15/11/2010 10:18:32 AM 897 Views
"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God". - 15/11/2010 01:15:33 PM 924 Views
I'm sure bin Laden completely agrees - 15/11/2010 01:32:53 PM 898 Views
When you give me an example of Jefferson murdering women and children that analogy will work. - 15/11/2010 01:49:04 PM 859 Views
yes because Jefferson was a PARAGON of virtue himself - 15/11/2010 02:17:58 PM 947 Views
I wasn't aware I'd made that statement. - 15/11/2010 02:25:27 PM 773 Views
nvm, I was going to argue but I have decided not to *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:46:42 PM 481 Views
So you are being completely subjective here? It is wrong, unless it is for a cause you support? *NM* - 15/11/2010 02:30:37 PM 406 Views
No, it's a question of precedence. - 15/11/2010 04:13:04 PM 785 Views
His analogy works very well, and you are still being subjective. - 15/11/2010 08:23:25 PM 1023 Views
The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 09:17:01 PM 1008 Views
Re: The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 10:52:40 PM 813 Views
I don't believe that at all. - 16/11/2010 12:08:26 AM 671 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 16/11/2010 11:52:36 PM 924 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 17/11/2010 01:34:29 AM 905 Views
No, its relevancy is difficult to grasp. - 16/11/2010 07:19:11 AM 1126 Views
Maybe I just have an unusual perspective. - 16/11/2010 04:15:39 PM 945 Views
I didn't know they bombed a SCHOOL!!! - 16/11/2010 04:31:24 PM 825 Views
Please. If there were any soldiers in the WTC on 911 it was coincidental. - 16/11/2010 04:40:51 PM 823 Views
perhaps, but not all important targets are military targets. - 16/11/2010 04:57:20 PM 1003 Views
Not all important targets are LEGITIMATE targets either. - 16/11/2010 05:06:11 PM 826 Views
I don't wish one, but I hate sidebars - 16/11/2010 05:09:33 PM 882 Views
All about priorities; your call. - 16/11/2010 10:33:53 PM 798 Views
That's so many hours of my life I'll never get back. - 16/11/2010 10:41:55 PM 824 Views
This your first time on the CMB? - 16/11/2010 11:18:03 PM 847 Views
No, NOW I know what's going on! - 16/11/2010 04:36:04 PM 969 Views
Still doesn't work. - 16/11/2010 04:50:58 PM 999 Views
Those last sentences are going way overboard. - 16/11/2010 05:08:40 PM 831 Views
Terrorism is inexcusable and indefensible, but at least there's a LOGIC to it. - 16/11/2010 05:21:15 PM 918 Views
First of all, your generalizations were misguided. - 16/11/2010 05:40:55 PM 940 Views
Of course I disagree, but that's a different and older debate. - 16/11/2010 11:10:23 PM 1113 Views
I will try to be brief. Try. - 16/11/2010 11:28:28 PM 919 Views
Heh. - 16/11/2010 11:55:40 PM 806 Views
mostly agree - 16/11/2010 11:18:14 PM 776 Views
. . . and now I'm thinking you're the one willfully misunderstanding. - 16/11/2010 05:36:15 PM 838 Views
Not willful, at least. - 17/11/2010 12:29:42 AM 798 Views
sorry - 16/11/2010 11:24:44 PM 887 Views
Well, you know what I was going on about, if that helps? *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:25:18 PM 478 Views
"Subversion" has the connotation of treason, however wrongly. - 15/11/2010 01:32:06 PM 901 Views
Re: Non-sequitur, non-sequitur, CAPS LOCK, opinion, CAPS LOCK. - 15/11/2010 10:45:41 PM 717 Views
Either my mind moves much faster than ya'lls, or ya'll are deliberately missing the point. - 16/11/2010 12:05:28 AM 928 Views
I am curious. - 16/11/2010 01:10:52 AM 766 Views
Argggh, ya got me! - 16/11/2010 05:11:41 PM 774 Views
the dictionary has -nia and -iums. - 16/11/2010 05:16:32 PM 871 Views
I prefer "millennia" but recall someone telling me that's not technically right. - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 818 Views
well, in American English, they're apparantly both "correct" *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:13:40 PM 517 Views
In American English, almost anything is. - 17/11/2010 01:02:15 AM 888 Views
It is right. It's the one thing that's easy in Latin and Greek declensions. - 16/11/2010 06:33:12 PM 818 Views
You call then "neutral" over there? Interesting. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:42:00 PM 514 Views
Neutral, neutrum, neuter, whatever. Details. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:45:29 PM 458 Views
Do only neuter words end in -um? - 16/11/2010 06:57:39 PM 885 Views
Yes. I think so, anyway - been a good while since I had Latin. - 16/11/2010 07:12:09 PM 872 Views
Thanks. Maybe that's what I'm remembering. - 16/11/2010 07:17:05 PM 857 Views
IIRC, the number of "n"s was the issue. - 17/11/2010 01:06:24 AM 850 Views
Should definitely be two. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:48:51 AM 423 Views
Ah, thanks. - 17/11/2010 02:08:08 AM 853 Views
Silly laptops.... - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 949 Views
- 16/11/2010 05:35:22 PM 771 Views
I'm horrible about using "conjugate" as a blanket term. - 17/11/2010 01:09:34 AM 914 Views
I'm definitely missing the point. - 16/11/2010 06:58:17 AM 861 Views
Well, hopefully we've cleared things up now. *MN* - 16/11/2010 05:30:46 PM 871 Views
I don't know if it qualifies as subversive... - 14/11/2010 02:47:34 AM 981 Views
Re: That's not bad. - 14/11/2010 01:38:02 PM 878 Views
The Chap - 14/11/2010 01:58:27 PM 771 Views
Thanks. - 14/11/2010 03:04:49 PM 845 Views
All my subversive websites are religious. - 15/11/2010 02:26:42 AM 842 Views
Re: I'm certainly interested. - 15/11/2010 03:37:11 AM 853 Views
Well, okay then. - 15/11/2010 04:23:35 AM 917 Views
Some stuff I think is pretty neat: - 15/11/2010 07:24:41 PM 918 Views
Re: Noice, noice. - 15/11/2010 11:01:31 PM 861 Views
That first link is really good. - 15/11/2010 11:18:25 PM 965 Views
Re: Ha! - 16/11/2010 11:55:42 PM 728 Views
Re: Also, I like your poems. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:02:27 AM 453 Views
Re: Dude. - 20/11/2010 02:14:38 AM 928 Views
you mean besides this one? *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:55:03 PM 359 Views
Re: I AM NOT SUBVERTING NEBHEAD!! - 15/11/2010 11:02:10 PM 849 Views
Re: William Faulkner would be unhappy with my thread. - 16/11/2010 08:29:42 PM 836 Views
My work here is done. - 16/11/2010 08:34:22 PM 790 Views
Re: Yes, it's fairly obvious that you need to respond. *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:40:10 PM 480 Views
I often wish I didn't. - 17/11/2010 01:49:33 AM 742 Views
I'm calling you out on this one. - 18/11/2010 12:06:17 AM 804 Views
It's not perfect, but it's the lesser of many evils, IMHO. - 18/11/2010 01:12:43 AM 866 Views
You people with your words. - 16/11/2010 08:34:17 PM 936 Views
. - 16/11/2010 08:54:22 PM 721 Views
Re: I still say we should start a band. - 20/11/2010 02:42:48 AM 892 Views
Re: Man, that attack on Cameron is brutal. *NM* - 20/11/2010 02:47:12 AM 438 Views
Re: Awesome. - 16/11/2010 11:38:29 PM 848 Views

Reply to Message