Active Users:441 Time:13/05/2025 07:35:19 PM
If you're talking about "affirmative action", then yes, I oppose that. Tim Send a noteboard - 26/08/2011 09:19:33 AM
It's just discrimination against majorities, as if two wrongs made a right.

Is that what you meant?
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1085 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 678 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 688 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 730 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 591 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 568 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 672 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 703 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 746 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 725 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 710 Views
so you would OK if the only offered it to straight students? *NM* - 25/08/2011 09:50:44 PM 258 Views
I expect some donor created a scholarship with that stipulation. - 25/08/2011 10:40:09 PM 666 Views
I know my reply to his message may have made in seem that I was objecting to the scholarship - 25/08/2011 11:10:33 PM 692 Views
If you're talking about "affirmative action", then yes, I oppose that. - 26/08/2011 09:19:33 AM 632 Views
no I was talking about feel good solutions to imaginary problems - 26/08/2011 01:38:33 PM 698 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 687 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 740 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 595 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 646 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 759 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 749 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 573 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 671 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 689 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 568 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 752 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 545 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 730 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 693 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 566 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 621 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 684 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 629 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 743 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 795 Views

Reply to Message