Active Users:164 Time:17/05/2024 05:25:09 AM
If you're talking about "affirmative action", then yes, I oppose that. Tim Send a noteboard - 26/08/2011 09:19:33 AM
It's just discrimination against majorities, as if two wrongs made a right.

Is that what you meant?
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 962 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 549 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 560 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 609 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 460 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 443 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 552 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 583 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 607 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 631 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 590 Views
so you would OK if the only offered it to straight students? *NM* - 25/08/2011 09:50:44 PM 212 Views
I expect some donor created a scholarship with that stipulation. - 25/08/2011 10:40:09 PM 542 Views
I know my reply to his message may have made in seem that I was objecting to the scholarship - 25/08/2011 11:10:33 PM 561 Views
If you're talking about "affirmative action", then yes, I oppose that. - 26/08/2011 09:19:33 AM 498 Views
no I was talking about feel good solutions to imaginary problems - 26/08/2011 01:38:33 PM 573 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 572 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 647 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 474 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 516 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 645 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 617 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 463 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 547 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 566 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 448 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 635 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 423 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 614 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 563 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 439 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 506 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 562 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 503 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 617 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 657 Views

Reply to Message