Active Users:707 Time:17/02/2026 05:02:50 PM
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM
I think a lot of it is they really do want to help. They really do want to promote diversity. But at the same time, they have that base human urge to be focused on things relevant to them (i.e. what they like/support/are). I think it does create a lot of what you're talking about. The problem with it affecting those higher up instead of those with less influence, I think, is compounded by the difference influences of the left's constituents versus the right's constituents. Unfortunately, I can't really explain why I think that. I'm having problems formulating the thoughts clearly. Perhaps you understand what I'm trying to say and can do so better.

I think both sides would benefit a great deal if they got back to objective party stances like small government vs. large government, or state government vs federal government, instead of "This is what I BELIEVE!!!". It feels a lot like it's become Democrats=Hippie-PETA, Republicans=Old-School Conservative Christian, and where you fall on a spectrum between the two. Obviously that's not exactly how it is, but that's how it feels. And that's just not effective for governing!
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1166 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 758 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 765 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 812 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 684 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 640 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 756 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 776 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 822 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 799 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 782 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 770 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 822 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 678 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 725 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 835 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 831 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 655 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 749 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 777 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 653 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 845 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 642 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 809 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 775 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 640 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 692 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 768 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 703 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 813 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 916 Views

Reply to Message