I think a lot of it is they really do want to help. They really do want to promote diversity. But at the same time, they have that base human urge to be focused on things relevant to them (i.e. what they like/support/are). I think it does create a lot of what you're talking about. The problem with it affecting those higher up instead of those with less influence, I think, is compounded by the difference influences of the left's constituents versus the right's constituents. Unfortunately, I can't really explain why I think that. I'm having problems formulating the thoughts clearly. Perhaps you understand what I'm trying to say and can do so better.
I think both sides would benefit a great deal if they got back to objective party stances like small government vs. large government, or state government vs federal government, instead of "This is what I BELIEVE!!!". It feels a lot like it's become Democrats=Hippie-PETA, Republicans=Old-School Conservative Christian, and where you fall on a spectrum between the two. Obviously that's not exactly how it is, but that's how it feels. And that's just not effective for governing!
I think both sides would benefit a great deal if they got back to objective party stances like small government vs. large government, or state government vs federal government, instead of "This is what I BELIEVE!!!". It feels a lot like it's become Democrats=Hippie-PETA, Republicans=Old-School Conservative Christian, and where you fall on a spectrum between the two. Obviously that's not exactly how it is, but that's how it feels. And that's just not effective for governing!
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left
- 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM
1234 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy.
- 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM
825 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article
- 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM
747 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter.
- 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
816 Views
Ummm, did you read the article?
- 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM
889 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either
- 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM
864 Views
But that's just a scholarship.
- 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM
848 Views
so you would OK if the only offered it to straight students? *NM*
- 25/08/2011 09:50:44 PM
336 Views
You do realize that there are indeed universities refusing admission to gay students?
- 25/08/2011 10:02:41 PM
724 Views
I would have no problem with a LGBT only school as long as it didn't take state money
- 25/08/2011 10:27:48 PM
808 Views
This is a private university, not a state university *NM*
- 25/08/2011 10:29:15 PM
363 Views
sorry that ended with NM. Were you trying to make a point if so I missed it *NM*
- 25/08/2011 10:40:48 PM
379 Views
I expect some donor created a scholarship with that stipulation.
- 25/08/2011 10:40:09 PM
817 Views
I know my reply to his message may have made in seem that I was objecting to the scholarship
- 25/08/2011 11:10:33 PM
850 Views
If you're talking about "affirmative action", then yes, I oppose that.
- 26/08/2011 09:19:33 AM
770 Views
I don't really have a problem with this
- 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM
884 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it
- 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM
742 Views
Fair Enough
- 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM
794 Views
The United Church of Christ is a rather liberal denomination - celebrating gay marriages, notably.
- 25/08/2011 10:06:26 PM
741 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity
- 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM
906 Views
well. It could be they just needed a reason, but for some reason couldn't be forthright?
- 26/08/2011 03:28:52 AM
738 Views
One of your lines struck me.
- 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM
903 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result
- 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
727 Views
That's an interesting point...
- 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM
820 Views
yes but but despite how much he was hated by the left the right saw him different
- 25/08/2011 11:32:19 PM
926 Views
Re: yes but but despite how much he was hated by the left the right saw him different
- 26/08/2011 09:57:13 PM
809 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result
- 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM
834 Views
I don't think most people believed Obama was a centrist so much as the anti-Bush
- 26/08/2011 12:40:43 AM
754 Views
I think you'll find very few Europeans agreeing with that assessment.
- 26/08/2011 10:18:19 PM
745 Views
Wow what a strawman
- 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM
908 Views
- 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM
908 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman
- 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM
719 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired
- 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM
874 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity.
- 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM
704 Views
- 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM
704 Views
I would definetly check "yes"
- 26/08/2011 12:11:29 AM
886 Views
but if they wanted to increase diversity they would offer yo a scholarship for being Muslim
- 26/08/2011 12:46:46 AM
743 Views
- 26/08/2011 12:46:46 AM
743 Views
id be a gay muslim, so Id be 3 minorities, a woman, a muslim and a lesbian, now if only I was black!
- 26/08/2011 02:16:50 AM
814 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"...
- 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM
831 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well
- 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM
767 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem
- 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM
877 Views
a question for you...
- 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM
1000 Views
I guess my question for you is how I made it sound like LGBT=liberal
- 26/08/2011 09:47:16 PM
744 Views
My guess is because you referenced "the lefts" fuzzy logic in a thread about a LGBT scholarship.
- 26/08/2011 11:07:32 PM
904 Views
