Active Users:612 Time:02/08/2025 10:53:29 PM
Logic classes would be good in schools. Timthetrolloc Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM
Blatant lies about 9/11 should not be encouraged but scientific studies were not done or were not done very well into many of the problems some people have with what exactly happened that day.

A few problems I would have liked to see studied in depth during the tragedy.

1. Why did WTC tower number 7 fall at all?

2. Why was there Thermite in the rubble of the two towers?

3. When steel skyscrapers caught fire in the past why didn't they fall when 3 skyscrapers fell on September 11, 2001 that were on fire.

4. Secondary explosions were heard by witnesses in New York on 9/11. What was the cause of these disturbances?

What is the Logic behind not thoroughly investigating exactly what happened? I would like to think a logical person would want the right questions asked and not put up with answers that are not logical explanations of observable phenomenon.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1315 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 862 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 890 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 817 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 935 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 868 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 765 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 932 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 814 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 866 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 963 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 848 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 928 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 758 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 783 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 824 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 880 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 862 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 845 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 857 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 711 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 859 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 814 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 918 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 752 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 778 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 932 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 891 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 842 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 874 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 823 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 849 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 901 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 893 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 818 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 840 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 843 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 935 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 923 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 780 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 851 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 816 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 932 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 389 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 799 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 830 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 814 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 802 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 842 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 820 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 429 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 861 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 720 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 887 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 751 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 785 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 838 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 764 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 891 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 423 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 781 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 350 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1027 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 823 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 995 Views

Reply to Message