Active Users:376 Time:17/09/2025 05:11:19 PM
Asking questions is never wrong. ironclad Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM
Blatant lies about 9/11 should not be encouraged but scientific studies were not done or were not done very well into many of the problems some people have with what exactly happened that day.

The problem is that the conspiracy theorists only see what they wanna see and mostly ignore the fact that there already have been plenty of rather simple answers to their questions, as seen in Ghavrel's reply.

The Bush administration is the most glorious bunch of douche bags I ever seen in political power, but to assume they would pull of such an inside job is simply outrageous.
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1328 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 877 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 902 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 829 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 948 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 881 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 778 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 947 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 836 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 890 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 974 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 858 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 952 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 770 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 812 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 835 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 892 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 876 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 857 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 883 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 723 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 874 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 825 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 931 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 764 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 792 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 957 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 905 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 854 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 892 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 836 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 861 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 931 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 909 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 831 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 852 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 868 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 950 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 935 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 794 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 864 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 829 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 945 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 395 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 824 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 841 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 842 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 818 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 855 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 835 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 436 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 875 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 734 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 900 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 764 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 797 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 861 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 780 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 919 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 427 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 797 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 369 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1040 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 843 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 1008 Views

Reply to Message