I agree with Jens that asking questions is never wrong, but there is no compelling evidence, unless you think the lies and unsubstantiated rumors passed off as fact in "Loose Change" is evidence.
The towers came down because of a combination of factors: (1) the actual shell of the building was the primary support structure (this might have been enough without any other factors), which was totally compromised when the airplanes ripped huge holes in that support structure, (2) the metal supports on the inside warped from the heat of jet fuel burning, which on its own might not have been enough to bring down the building, and (3) all of this happened near the top of the buildings, which essentially pushed all of the pressure down to lower floors.
The only problem I have with the "official" story is that it takes a lot of coincidences to make it work, just like the ones you listed. Is it impossible? No. But it just feels...dirty to me. The buildings collapsed just like a controlled demolition. But I do concede that all these odd coincidences are possible. I'm not as nutty as this conspiracy nut that I talked to last week. He claimed that the hijackers, and even Osama Bin Laden, were on the CIA payroll. People like to think that he government is capable of anything but that's pushing it!
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM
- 1285 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools.
20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM
- 833 Views
Ugh.
20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM
- 864 Views
Re: Ugh.
21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM
- 788 Views
Something tells me that no matter who answered your questions you wouldn't believe anyway.
21/09/2011 02:16:52 AM
- 792 Views
this is a controlled demolition
21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM
- 903 Views
I've seen controlled demolitions in person. They happen in the opposite order of the WTC collapses.
21/09/2011 03:54:35 AM
- 836 Views
Agreed
20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM
- 780 Views
I've long advocated this for the reasons Tom states as well as others.
21/09/2011 06:49:28 AM
- 741 Views
I don't know if the Internet is degrading skills, or just giving stupid people a voice
20/09/2011 02:33:24 PM
- 843 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed
20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM
- 830 Views
No, there is not.
20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM
- 936 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least
20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM
- 817 Views
As far as conspiracies go ...
20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM
- 886 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid?
20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM
- 734 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist.
20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM
- 746 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11
20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM
- 796 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence.
20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM
- 855 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed
20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM
- 842 Views
But that's what I DID argue.
20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM
- 818 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms
21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM
- 823 Views
I've always seen them as separate.
21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM
- 683 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member.
21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM
- 893 Views
I'm still annoyed.
21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM
- 726 Views
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate
21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM
- 723 Views
and I pointed that it was was just continuin gthe Clinton policy
21/09/2011 02:30:13 PM
- 788 Views
Even if that were true, it would still be flip flopping on a central Bush platform plank.
21/09/2011 05:45:10 PM
- 833 Views
In addition:
20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM
- 859 Views
Contemplate this....
20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM
- 814 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me
20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM
- 806 Views

You should watch the pilot episode of the X-Files spin-off series The Lone Gunmen.
20/09/2011 08:19:15 PM
- 839 Views
Make 'em all take debate.
20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM
- 790 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM
- 798 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM
- 780 Views
Not actually the best example
21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM
- 772 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building?
21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM
- 819 Views
The fireproofing was scraped off the steel by the crash, so the beams melted.
21/09/2011 07:35:08 PM
- 999 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM
- 840 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses?
21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM
- 862 Views
You could still argue.
21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM
- 725 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person
21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM
- 761 Views

Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math.
21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM
- 734 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid.
21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM
- 998 Views
I really and truly appreciate your love of pure math for math's sake, but...
21/09/2011 11:10:03 PM
- 770 Views
Well, it requires a lot more science to really dispute things than HS can give someone
21/09/2011 11:28:29 PM
- 764 Views